[00:00:07]
>>> IT IS THE EXECUTIVE SESSION DATE OF JUNE 24, 2021.
FIRST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT.
[1) PLANNING COMMISSION RPC]
IF YOU WOULD PLEASE APPROACH. AND I SEE WE HAVE THREE ITEMS. ITEM NUMBER ONE IS ORDINANCE NUMBER ONE Ã2020 Ã2021 Ã2022. >> WE WILL GET OUR PRESENTATION AND. GOOD EVENING CITY COUNCIL, MAYOR. HERE WE GO.
OKAY. THIS FIRST CASE NUMBER IS ONE COMMISSION Z 32 2021 WRITTEN APPLICATION OF MARGARITA.
.4 ACRES CURRENTLY ZONED M1 GOING TO R-4.
RM ONE IS A SINGLE WIDE MOBILE HOME ONLY DISTRICT.
A LOT OF THIS PORTION OF THE CITY IS ZONED RM1, WHICH IS THERE IN THE DARK ORANGE. AND THIS PROPERTY IS HALF RM1, HALF R-4 CURRENTLY. THEY ARE WISHING TO GO TO ALL R-4. IT IS AN EXTENSION OF THE R-4 EAST EVANS ROAD AND SHAW DRIVE. THIS IS IN COUNCIL WAR DISTRICT NUMBER THREE FOR THERE IS AN EXISTING HOMESITE WITH A SINGLE WIDE MOBILE HOME IN A MODERATE SLOPE IN THE APPLICANTS STATEMENT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REZONING IS TO BUILD AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR THE AREA AND IMPROVE CURRENT PROPERTY.
PLANNING TO BUILD TOWNHOMES IN THE RANGE OF 200,000.
THIS IS EVANS ROAD APPROACHING THE PROPERTY.
IF ANYONE NEEDS AND KUDZU, EVEN GO GET SOME THERE.
THIS IS THE PROPERTY WITH A SINGLE WIDE MOBILE HOME CURRENTLY ON THEIR. THE TENANT WILL MOVE OUT AND THEY WILL BE MOVED OUT IN THIS PROPERTY WILL BE DEVELOPED.
YOU CAN SEE OUR SIGN RIGHT THERE ON THE RIGHT.AND THAT IS THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. NO COMMENTS OR CONCERNS FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS. THIS IS IN THE FORT CAMPBELL NOISE DISCLOSURE AREA AND SO THE PLAT WILL BE STAMPED WITH A NOTE THAT YOU ARE IN AN AREA OF ADDITIONAL NOISE FROM PORT AND FORT CAMPBELL. HISTORICAL ESTIMATES WOULD PUT THIS AT EIGHT UNITS. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ZONING REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED LAND USE PLAN FOR IN THE EVANS AREA CONTINUES TO BE AN AREA OF TRANSITION WITH LONG-STANDING MOBILE HOME DISTRICT IS SEEN INCREASED INTEREST IN REDEVELOPING ITS CONVENTIONAL BUILT SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES, DUPLEXES MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS. THE REQUEST IS EXISTENT EXTENSION OF THE TRENTO DISTRICT AND WILL BRING THE REMAINDER OF THE PARCEL INTO INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES SITE WITH NO ADVERSE OF OUR MENTAL ISSUES AT THIS TIME.
PLANNING COMMISSION ALSO RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
>> ANY MEMBER HAVE A QUESTION FOR MR. KENDALL.
>> I HAVE A QUESTION. YOU MENTIONED THE NOISE ISSUE IN THE PLAT. IT WILL BE NOTED ON THE PLAT? HOW DOES THE INDIVIDUAL HOMEOWNER OR BUYER OR RENTER
KNOW? >> UNLESS A LOOK AT THE PLAT.
THERE'S NO ADDITIONAL LITERATURE OR OTHER NOTIFICATIONS THAT ARE GIVEN. ONLY WHEN YOU ARE IN THE NOISE ZONE OF SABER HELIPORT, WHICH ISCLOSER TO BARTON SPRINGS ROAD OR CLOSER TO LAFAYETTE OVER THERE , THERE IS I BELIEVE A DISCLOSURE ACT CLOSING. THIS IS IN THE ONE MILE BUFFER, WHICH IS WHY IT GETS THAT DISCLOSURE, BUT IT IS NOT IN THE NOISE ZONE FROM THE ACTUAL HELIPORT, WHICH HAS DEFINED RINGS OF NOISE THAT LEAVE IT. NOT SURE THERE IS EXACTLY AWAY.
THERE ARE WAYS WE CAN DO IT. A PREVIOUS JOB TO WORK ON COMMUNITY OUTREACH AROUND MILITARY BASES.
DEFINITELY SOME LITERATURE. CLOSING OR RENTING WOULD BE
HELPFUL. >> I KNOW THAT WE WANT TO PROTECT SABER IN CAMPBELL ARMY AIRFIELD FROM LIGHT POLLUTION SO THAT NIGHT TRAINING CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AND WE DON'T JEOPARDIZE OR COMPROMISE THEIR ABILITY TO DO THAT.I'M JUST LOOKING ON THE OTHER SIDE BILLION POTENTIAL HOMEOWNERS.
>> EVERYTHING IN THE FORT CAMPBELL NOTIFICATION DISTRICT DOES HAVE TO ADHERE TO THE NIGHT WORK SKIES LIGHTING.
ALL THE LIGHTING WILL BE DOWN FACED AND CERTAIN TYPES OF LIGHTING. THAT IS ONE ADVANTAGE OF BEING IN THEIR. IS DEFINITELY SOMETHING WE CAN RAISE TO THE COMMITTEE AT FORT CAMPBELL.
AND I THINK THEY ARE GETTING A MEETING HERE SOON THAT WE CAN START MEETING AGAIN WITH THEM TO TALK ABOUT POTENTIAL GORGON.
COUNCILPERSON GARETT, YOU RECOGNIZE.
[00:05:01]
>>RICHARD GARETT : WAS GOING TO SPEAK TO THE NOTIFICATION AS FAR AS POTENTIAL HOMEOWNERS. AS IT PERTAINS TO THE INITIAL BUYER, THE SELLER WOULD DO PROPERTY CONDITION EXEMPTION DISCLOSURE BECAUSE HE DOESN'T HAVE TO AS A BUILDER, HE JUST PROVIDES ONE-TIME WARRANTY? BUT IF THE PROPERTY RESOLD IN THEORY IT WOULD BE ON THE BUYER TO PUT ON THERE, THERE IS A SPOT TO TALK ABOUT NOISE AND NUANCES AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE. IT WOULD BE UP TO THEM TO
PROPERLY DISCLOSE IT. >> IT IS THOSE DISCLOSURES VERY FEW PEOPLE READ. COUNCILPERSON ALAN, YOUR
RECOGNIZED. >> JUST A QUESTION FOR INFORMATION. HOW IS IT DECIDED THAT
SOMETHING MEET THIS NOISE? >> YES.
FIRST THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT AREAS OF ONE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THIRD ONE IS WITHIN ONE MILE REGARDLESS OF WHERE YOU ARE IN THE CITY OR COUNTY. IT IS WHAT WE CALL THE NOISE DISCLOSURE AREA. THEN WE HAVE THE NOISE ZONES FROM SABER HELIPORT, WHICH IS PUBLISHED BY THE US ARMY.
THEY DO AND NOISE STUDY BASED ON THE TYPE OF AIRCRAFT AND HOW OFTEN THEY FLY. AND THERE RINGS A HIGH DECIBELS, MEDIUM DB, LOW DB. DEPENDING ON YOU ARE YOU ACTUALLY HAVE TO BUILD YOUR HOUSE WITH NOISE ATTENUATING WINDOWS, MORE INSULATION ON THE ROOF, DIFFERENT DISCLOSURES AND DIFFERENT CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AT THAT POINT.
VERY LITTLE OF THE CITY IS COVERED UNDER THE NOISE ZONES, BUT AS AN AGREEMENT WITH FORT CAMPBELL.
BACK IN THE 90S, I THINK, WHEN THEY START DOING THIS.
ANYTHING WITHIN A MILE WE SEND EVERY PLAN AND EVERY ZONING WITHIN A MILE OF FORT CAMPBELL GOES TO THEM AND THAT IT ALSO
GETS THAT DISCLOSURE. >> SO DO WE HAVE ANY OF THE NOISE ZONES OUTSIDE OF FORT CAMPBELL?
LIKE IN THE ACTUAL CITY? >> I CAN GET YOU A MAP.
IT IS ON OUR WEBSITE. >> OKAY.
>> BARTON SPRINGS ROAD, LAFAYETTE ROAD TOWARD SABER HELIPORT. IT DOESN'T LEAVE IT TOO FAR, BUT THERE ARE NOISE ZONES THAT DO SPILLOVER.
>> COUNCILPERSON STREET MEN, YOUR RECOGNIZED.
>> THANK YOU MA'AM. DON'T KNOW IF THIS QUESTION WOULD BE FOR YOU ARE ONE OF THE FELLOW COUNCILMEMBERS WHO SPOKE A MOMENT AGO IMPORTANT BUT FIRST OF ALL THEY HAVE TO LOOK AT THE PLAT TO KNOW THEY ARE IN A NOISE ZONE BUT MY CONCERNED WOULD BE IF THAT IS NOT EASY FOR THE PUBLIC TO KNOW WHERE THEY NEED TO GO TO BE ABLE TO ACCESS THAT.
I WOULD BE CONCERNED IF THE DISCLOSURE THEY ARE GETTING IS IF THEY PUT DOWN MONEY THAT IS EARNEST MONEY THAT THEY ARE GOING TO BUY IT. AND THEY WALK AWAY FROM THE DEAL BECAUSE THEY FIND OUT IN CLOSING IT IS WITHIN A NOISE ZONE THEY ARE POTENTIALLY GOING TO LOSE THAT MONEY THEY PUT DOWN. SO THERE IS A WAY THAT THAT COULD BE EASY FOR THEM TO FIND IT SOONER? OR THAT A POTENTIAL BUYER COULD NO SOONER IN REFERENCE TO ONE
OF THE PREVIOUS SPEAKERS? >> I DON'T HAVE ANY ANSWERS FOR YOU RIGHT NOW. I CAN GET YOU SOME ANSWERS.
IF OTHER MEMBERS OF COUNCILS TO BE HAVE ANSWERS THERE.
I CAN GET YOU THE INNER WORKINGS AND SEND IT OUT TO THE ENTIRE COUNCIL OF THE FORT NOISE DISCLOSURE AREA.
>> THE QUESTION WASN'T DIRECTLY DIRECTED, THAT IS THE PROPER WAY TO PUT IT, THE COUNCILPERSON GARETT, BUT YOU
WISH TO TAKE A STAB AT IT? >> PART OF THE NEW CONSTRUCTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, THERE ARE SEVERAL BLOCKS TO THE BOTTOM OF ITTHAT ENABLE YOU HAVE CERTAIN INSPECTIONS DONE .
ONE OF THEM IS BEING IN THE FEASIBILITY TO LOOK AT THE REQUEST TO PLAT AND DEED RESTRICTIONS FIRST.IT WOULD BE UP TO THEIR AGENT. IT WOULD FALL ON THEIR REALTOR TO REQUEST THOSE DOCUMENTS AND GET THEM TO THE BUYER FOR THEM TO REVIEW. PRIOR TO CLOSING GORGON SO THEY WOULD HAVE THAT ESSENTIALLY ONCE IT WENT UNDER CONTRACT AND A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF DAYS TO REVIEW ITAND HAVE SOME TYPE OF
AN OBJECTION TO IT. >> BE FOR THE PUT ANY KIND OF MONEY DOWN THE COULD POTENTIALLY LOSE?
>> SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO DEPENDING ON THE BUILDER.
THEY MAY HAVE TO PUT DOWN A BUILDER DEPOSIT UPFRONT .
ALL THAT CAN BE NEGOTIATED DEPENDING ON WHO THE BUILDER IS AND WHAT THE TERMS OF IT ARE. BUT THERE ARE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THEM TO REVIEW THE PLAT EVEN BEFORE AN OFFER SUBMITTED AN AGENT. YOU JUST ASK THE LISTING AGENT AND GET IT TO THE BUYER ALONG WITH ANY DEED RESTRICTIONS OR HOA. YOUR AVERAGE BUYER MAY NOT NECESSARILY KNOW TO ASK FOR THAT.
HOPEFULLY THEY HAVE AN AGENT THAT IS DEALT WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION ENOUGH TO ASK THOSE QUESTIONS AND GET THE CLIENT INFORMATION TO MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION.
>>JOE PITTS: ANYONE ELSE HAVE COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS REGARDING
[00:10:04]
ORDINANCE ONE CINQ NONE WE ARE READY FOR ITEM 2, ORDINANCE 2 2021 Ã2022 . MR. TYNDALL?>> THIS IS PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NUMBER Z 3320 21 HERE THIS IS THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE.
JOE PITTS MAYOR. .43 ACRES CURRENTLY ZONED CBD REQUESTING TO GO TO R-4. THIS IS NOT AN EXTENSION OF THE R-4. YOU CAN SEE IT IS ALMOST ADJACENT TO IT. ONE PROPERTY OWNER.THERE IS ONE OVER TOWARD THE DOG HILL AREA.
PROPERTIES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF UNION STREET AND SOUTH THIRD STREET INTERSECTIONS IN CITY WARD NUMBER SIX. APPLICANT STATEMENT.
THE PROPERTY IS AN AREA OF OTHER R-4 PROPERTY SPIRIT UPON APPROVAL THE PROPERTY WILL BE DONATED TO A NONPROFIT AGENCY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSITIONAL HOUSING FOR FAMILIES AFFECTED BY TRAUMA. ERVICES PROVIDED INCLUDE EMERGENCY HOUSING, 24 HOUR HOTLINE,TRANSPORTATION COMMUNITY EDUCATION , INFORMATION AND REFERRAL.
THE LOCATION IS CLOSE TO OTHER SUPPORTIVE SERVICES AND ACCESS TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION. THIS IS ON THE BACKSIDE OF UNION STREET. THE WAREHOUSE ON THE LEFT, THE CITY PROPERTY IS JUST TO BE ON THAT.
HERE IT IS LOOKING HEAD ON. THE BUILDING KNOWN AS THE WELL IS TO THE RIGHT OF THAT AND YOU ARE LOOKING FROM UNION STREET.
AND THEN THERE IS THE SIDE STREET THE THIRD STREET.
SUBJECT PROPERTY ON THE LEFT, THE WELL ON THE RIGHT.
THERE WERE NO OTHER COMMENTS OR CONCERNS FROM THE CITY OR COUNTY DEPARTMENTS.STIMATED THE MOUNTING UNITS WOULD BE FIVE. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED REQUEST CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE PLAN, THE PROPOSED R-4 MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT IS NOT OUT OF CHARACTER WITH THE SURROUNDING USES AN ADEQUATE INFRASTRUCTURE SERVES THE SITE AND NO ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES WERE IDENTIFIED. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS
APPROVAL. >>JOE PITTS: THANK YOU.
I WILL SAY PRIOR TO THE PROPERTY BEING TURNED OVER TO THE NONPROFIT IT WOULD REQUIRE CITY ACTION.
THIS IS JUST THE FIRST STEP THEY'VE ASKED US TO TAKE.
IT IS A VERY DELICATE SITUATION REGARDING THIS NONPROFIT THAT PROVIDES AN IMPORTANT SERVICE, SINGULAR SERVICE IN THE COMMUNITY. COUNCILPERSON REYNOLDS, YOUR
RECOGNIZED. >> I HAD A QUESTION, CBD PROPERTY DOESN'T IT ALREADY ALLOW FOR R-4? ARE WE NARROWING THE USE BY REZONING IT IS AN ART
ENCOMPASSED IN THE CBD ZONING. >> MULTIFAMILY HOUSING IS, BUT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING IS NOT PERMITTED.
SO IT IS ALLOWED IN R-4. THAT IS A SLIGHT DIFFERENCE HERE. THERE IS A MEETING BETWEEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, CITY CODES AND THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DISCUSS THE USE IN THE PROCESS. THE REASON WE ARE DOING THE SIX FRONT AS A CITY IS IT MAKES IT A LOT EASIER ON THE END-USER THAN IF THEY HAD TO COME BACK AND REZONE IT THEMSELVES.
THAT IS WHY YOU ARE SEEING THE ORDER OF OPERATIONS THE WAYIT
IS . >> TO BE ALREADY KNOW WHO IS GOING TO DO THIS? IS IT PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE?
I DON'T KNOW. >>JOE PITTS: I WILL SHARE FOR THE NONPROFIT IS HIS URBAN INDUSTRIES AND IT'S A VERY DELICATE SITUATION, BUT THEY DO OPERATE A PROGRAM THAT AFFECTS FOLKS THAT ARE IN TRAUMA AND IT IS USUALLY A LOCATION THAT WAS NOT ONE FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. AND DO MY BEST TO TAP DANCE FROM THIS. BUT IT IS A WORTHY CAUSE.
COUNCILPERSON ALLEN? >>WANDA ALLEN : THAT WAS GOING TO BE MY EXACT QUESTION. ESTHER BAKER, WOULD THERE BE ANYTHING AGAINST US WHEN THIS IS DISCUSSED WHEN IT IS TALKED ABOUT? FOR US TO DO IT IN A EXECUTIVE SESSION PRIVATE SESSION BECAUSE THIS IS A VERY DELICATE TOPIC.
>> NO. >>WANDA ALLEN : ALL RIGHT.
THANK YOU. >>JOE PITTS: IT'S TOUGH.
IT'S TOUGH.NY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING THIS? IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, I INVITE YOU TO CALL MR. NEWBERN AT THE OFFICE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY OF DRUG DEVELOPMENT. HE CAN GIVE YOU THE RUNDOWN FOR THAT. WE ARE NOW BREAKING FOR ITEM 3, RESOLUTION TWO Ã2022. MR. TYNDALL? BUT YES. AS PART OF ANNEXATION PROCESS, IF ALL THE CITY SERVICES CANNOT BE PROVIDED ON THE DAY OF ANNEXATION, WHICH TYPICALLY GAS, WATER, SEWER AND ELECTRIC
[00:15:09]
CAN'T ALWAYS BE DONE. YOU TO DO A SIX MONTH PLAN OF SERVICE PROGRESS REPORT OR UPDATE.THIS WAS ONE THAT WAS COMPLETED LAST YEAR OFF BRITTON SPRINGS ROAD . IT WAS A ONE 2020 AT THE TIME.
THE ONLY ITEM THAT WAS NOT COMPLETED AT THE TIME WAS THE RUNNING OF CDE LIGHT DOWN AND ELECTRIC.
I HAVE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH BRIAN AT CDE AND WE HAVE A MEMO THAT SAYS THEY HAVE COMPLETED THAT.
AND SO THIS IS A RESOLUTION THAT SAYS WE HAVE COMPLETED IT.
ALL THE SERVICES FOR THE PROPERTY.
IN THE PLAN OF SERVICE HAS BEEN SATISFIED.
THIS DOES REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING NEXT WEEK.
AND ONCE IT IS DONE IT WILL BE NOTED IT IS FULLY IN THE CITY
WITH ALL THE SERVICES PROVIDED. >>JOE PITTS: ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING RESOLUTION TO? CINQ NONE HEARING ON.
MR. TYNDALL, ANYTHING ELSE? >> THAT IS ALL TONIGHT.
[2) CONSENT AGENDA]
NEXT ITEM IS OUR CONSENT AGENDA.MADAME CLERK? >> 8320 2021 SECOND READING.
AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY LOOK AT IT YOUR EYE 24 EXIT 8 TO SILICON RANCH CORPORATION FOR A SOLAR POWER GENERATION FACILITY. ORDINANCE 105 Ã1021 SECOND READING BUT AUTHORIZING EXERCISE OF RIGHT OF EMINENT DOMAIN TO OBTAIN EASEMENTS GRANTING ACCESS OVER AND ACROS PROPERTY NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN THE NORTH CLARKSVILLE WATER TREATMENT PLANT .
ORDINANCE 106 Ã2020 Ã21 SECOND READING.
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL CODE RELATIVE TO THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTHPRO GRANDPA. ORDINANCE 107 Ã2020 Ã21 SECOND READING PRINT AUTHORIZING SALE OF SURPLUS TAX AT PROPERTIES AT PUBLIC AUCTION.
ORDINANCE 108-2020 Ã2021 SECOND READING BUT AUTHORIZING DONATION PROPERTIES LOCATED AT DUMAS DRIVE AND ELM HILL DRIVE TO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.
ORDINANCE 111 Ã2020 Ã21 SECOND READING.
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, APPLICATION OF RITA HOMEBUILDERS, FOR ZONE CHANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF OAK STREET AND MAN CIRCLE FROM 3, THREE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO R-4 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
ORDINANCE 112 2020 21 SECOND READING.
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE. APPLICATION OF.
[NAME] FOR ZONE CHANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF DOCTOR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. PARKWAY HIGHWAY 76 AND NEW SOUTH DRIVE FROM C-4 HIGHWAY INTERCHANGE DISTRICT TO R-4 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
ORDINANCE 113 Ã2020 Ã21 SECOND READING.
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE APPLICATION OF SINGLE TERRY CONSTRUCTION LLC.
FOR SINGLE-FAMILY TERRY AGENT FOR ZONE CHANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF CENTERPOINT DRIVE AND CENTER COURT FROM C-5 HIGHWAY AND ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
ORDINANCE 114 2020 21 SECOND READING.
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE BUT APPLICATION OF SALVADOR CASTRO.
REX HAWKINS AGENT FOR ZONE CHANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF FORT CAMPBELL BOULEVARD AND JACK MILLER BOULEVARD FROM C- 5 HIGHWAY AND ARTERIAL DISTRICT IT GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. ORDINANCE 115 2020 21 SECOND READING AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPLICATION OF SAID HEDRICK. SID HEDRICK AGENT FOR ZONE CHANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT SOUTH.
NORTH OF WEST HIGH STREET IN EAST TO CHARLOTTE STREET.
FROM OUR 353 FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND SIX RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
ORDINANCE 116 Ã2020 Ã21 SECOND READING.
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE. APPLICATION OF BRISTOL RIDGE APARTMENTS FOR ZONE CHANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 76 AND NORTH OF CARMEL FLEX WEIGHT FROM C-3 ARTERIAL
[00:20:12]
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND R-3 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO R-3 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.HIGHWAY AND ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. ORDINANCE 117 2020 21 SECOND READING. AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE.
APPLICATION OF BRIAN WOLF , HOUSTON SMITH AGENT FOR ZONE CHANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF PROVIDENCE BOULEVARD AND EAST OF K SPRINGS ROAD FROM R-3 THREE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND R-3 THREE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. ORDINANCE 119 Ã2020 Ã2021 AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE A MAP OF T■HE CITY OF THE CLARKSVILLE. APPLICATION OF WILLIAM BALLOU JUNIOR FOR ZONE CHANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF NEEDMORE ROAD AND HAZELWOOD ROAD FROM R-1 A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO C-5 HIGHWAY AND ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. RESOLUTION THREE Ã2021 Ã2022 APPROVING APPOINTMENTS TO THE ARTS AND HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, ETHICS COMMISSION, PARKING COMMISSION, OUR BOARD, AND SUSTAINABILITY BOARD. AND ADOPTION OF MINUTES JUNE 3,
JUNE 15, JUNE 17, JUNE 22. >>JOE PITTS: THANK YOU.
ANY MEMBER WISH TO BE RECOGNIZED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. COUNCILPERSON, YOU ARE
RECOGNIZE. >> MORE OF A COMMENT QUESTION.
I HAVE HAD A FEW OF MY CONSTITUENTS REACH OUT REGARDING THE GAS AND WATER EMINENT DOMAIN.
AND THEY ARE CONCERNED IT WOULD CREATE ANOTHER LENGTHY EXPENSIVE LAWSUIT. JUST CONCERNED OVER ALL FOR THE USE OF EMINENT DOMAIN. I HAVE SHARED THE INFORMATION, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF ANYONE ELSE IS GETTING EMAILS FROM THEIR CONSTITUENTS.UT I HAVE GOTTEN A COUPLE.
>>JOE PITTS: THANK YOU. >> MR. RIGGINS CAN CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT I THINK YOU WILL BE ASKING THAT ORDINANCE 105 DIE FOR LACK OF A SECOND. WE ARE NOT GOING TO PURSUE THAT ORDINANCE. AT THIS TIME.
IS THAT RIGHT? I MAY HAVE SPOKEN TOO SOON.
>> WE WILL SEE YOU NEXT WEEK. >>JOE PITTS: IS THAT CORRECT? OKAY. IT WILL BE PULLED FROM CONSENT
OR IN. >> YOU WILL HAVE TO BE DISPOSED OF THROUGH PARLIAMENT TRULY MEANS.
WE CAN EXPLAIN MORE NEXT WEEK. >> ON ITEM NUMBER ONE REGARDING THE SECOND READING OF THE AUTHORIZING OF THE PURCHASE OPTION FOR THE PROPERTY TO SILICON RANCH, OF A HANDOUT I WILL DISTRIBUTE TO YOU. TO KIND OF WALK YOU THROUGH THE AMENDMENT FOR THE AMENDED PRICE FOR THAT.
THERE IS ALSO AN ERROR DISCOVERED ON THE APPRAISAL BY THE APPRAISAL COMPANY. THERE IS A LETTER ATTACHED WHERE THEY SHOW WHERE THEY MADE THE ERROR.
SO I WILL LET YOU HAVE THAT AND BEGAN TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS NEXT WEEK WHEN I GET THERE. ANYBODY ELSE HAVE A QUESTION REGARDING THE CONSENT AGENDA? OKAY.
WE ARE NOW READY FOR THE FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CHAIRPERSON STREETMAN. >>STACEY STREETMAN: THANK YOU
[4) GAS & WATER COMMITTEE]
MAYOR I WILL HAVE A REPORT NEXT WEEK.>>JOE PITTS: WE ARE NOW READY FOR GAS AND WATER COMMITTEE.
CHAIRPERSON REDD, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.> THIS IS THE SOLUTION 63 2021 AND MR. RIGGINS HAS INDICATED HE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS IF THERE IS NO OBJECTION FOR JUST A
MINUTE. >>JOE PITTS: IF YOU DON'T MIND,
COME ON UP AND TALK TO US. >> THANK YOU.
I WILL BE VERY BRIEF. WANT TO THANK ALL OF YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE ON THIS RESOLUTION. I'M HAPPY TO REPORT I ATTENDED THE BY COUNTY BOARD MEETING YESTERDAY WHICH WE DISCUSSED AT LENGTH AND REACHED A VERBAL AGREEMENT.
AND SO WE ARE JUST WAITING ON THE FINALIZED AGREEMENT TO GET BACK TO US. THAT BEING SAID, I WOULD ASK YOU TO DEFER THIS ONE MORE MONTH TO ALLOW US TIME TO RECEIVE THAT AND THEN BRING THAT FORWARD TO YOU NEXT MONTH.
>>JOE PITTS: ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. RIGGINS? THANK YOU. CHAIRPERSON REDD.
>> THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT. >>JOE PITTS: WE ARE RAISING FOR HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY.
CHAIRPERSON SMITH IS NOT HERE. SHE'S EXCUSED.
WE ARE GOING ON TO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE.
THAT WOULD BE CHAIRPERSON RICHMOND.
>>VONDELL RICHMOND: I WILL HAVE A FULL REPORT FOR YOU NEXT
WEEK. >>JOE PITTS: WE ARE READY FOR
[00:25:01]
THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT.CHAIRPERSON GARETT, YOU RECOGNIZED WHAT WE WILL HAVE A
REPORT NEXT WEEK. >>JOE PITTS: WE ARE NOW READY
[9)NEW BUSINESS]
FOR STREETS, GARAGE, TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE.AGAIN CHAIRPERSON SMITH IS NOT HERE AND SO WE WILL NOW MOVE TO NEW BUSINESS ORDINANCE 92 Ã 2020 Ã21.
POSTPONED FROM JUNE 3. APPROVING A SETTLEMENT OF THE ROBINSONS AND/OR FRANKLIN STREET CORPORATION VERSUS CITY STATE COURT AND FEDERAL COURT LAWSUIT.
COUNCILPERSON BUTLER, YOU ARE THE ONGOING SPONSOR OF THIS.
YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >> MR. BAKER.
>> THE MAYOR WILL BE CALLING I BELIEVE A SPECIAL CALLED SECTION SESSION NEXT TUESDAY. WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO REACH IN PRINCIPLE AND ORALLY HAD AGREEMENT ON A PRECISE PROJECT AGREEMENT AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND LAWSUIT, WHICH IS THE FEDERAL COURT LAWSUIT IN THE THIRD LAWSUIT, WHICH IS THE SECOND STATE LAWSUIT.
WE WILL BE SENDING OUT THE AGREEMENT, THE FINAL VERSION OF IT TO YOU ONCE WE GET THE ASSENT FROM THE OTHER SIDE.
THE LAST THING THAT WAS GOING ON WAS HAMMERING OUT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THE ENGINEERS ARE HAVING TO LOOK AT ALL OF THAT. I THINK EVERYTHING IS COMPLETE NOW. SO FIRST RATING WOULD BE TUESDAY NIGHT AND SPECIAL COLDS SESSION AND SECOND READING WOULD BE AT THE REGULAR SESSION IN JULY.
AND SO NEXT WEEK WHAT WE WOULD BE DOING IS AMENDING ORDINANCE 92 TO DELETE THE CURRENT VERSION ORDINANCE 92 AND SUBSTITUTING INSTEAD THE NEW SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.
WHICH ALSO HAS A PROJECT AGREEMENT.
>>JOE PITTS: COUNCILPERSON BUTLER.
>> MOTION TO AMEND AND WE WILL BE GOOD TO GO TO AMEND IT.
OKAY. >>JOE PITTS: YEAH, WE WILL.
JUST FOR THE PUBLIC AS WELL AS THE COUNCILS INFORMATION.
WE WILL HAVE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT SESSION WILL WE DISCUSS THAT AGREEMENT AND THEN WE WILL COME BACK INTO REGULAR SESSION TO DEBATE, DELIBERATE AND VOTE. ANYTHING ELSE CULBERSON BUTLER.
>>JOE PITTS: WE ARE READY FOR ITEM NUMBER TWO, UNDER NEW BUSINESS ORDINANCE 98 2020 Ã 2021 POSTPONED FROM JUNE 3 AMENDING THE OFFICIAL CODE RELATIVE TO FAILURE TO RETAIN CONTINUOUS COUNSEL RESIDENCY REQUIREMENTS PRINT COUNCILPERSON REYNOLDS, YOU AR THE SPONSOR AND YOU ARE
RECOGNIZED. >>KAREN REYNOLDS: AND WILL HAVE
A DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING . >>JOE PITTS: OKAY.
THANK YOU. ITEM 3 RESOLUTION 65 Ã2020 Ã 2021 POSTPONED FROM APRIL 1. REQUESTING THE MAYOR CALL A SPECIAL SESSION OF THE COUNCIL IS A COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE TO STUDY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS PERTAINING TO THE CITY CODE OF ETHICS. I BELIEVE COUNCILPERSON ALAN YOU ARE THE SPONSOR OF THE AND YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.
>> I HAVE A QUESTION. IT'S A RESOLUTION SO COULD I CHANGE THAT TO ANOTHER MEETING? I JUST HAVE TO GO AND
POSTPONE IT, RIGHT? >> I'M NOT SURE I UNDERSTAND
WHAT YOU ARE SAYING. >> IF I KNOW ÃWE HAVE BEEN HAVING A LOT OF SPECIAL MEETINGS AND I THINK WE ARE ALL PRETTY TIRED. IS IT POSSIBLE FOR ME TO PUSH IT BACK OR DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT?
>> IS ENTIRELY POSSIBLE AND I SUGGEST EVERYBODY WOULD WELCOME A MOTION TO POSTPONE IT TO MAY BE AUGUST.
OR EVEN SEPTEMBER. CITY COUNCIL STILL HAS TO DO A BUDGET.THERE IS A WHOLE LOT ON YOUR PLATE.
>> WHEN I SAID JULY 1 I ALWAYS FORGET .
WHEN I SAY IT ÃI THOUGHT IT WAS GOING TO BE AUGUST SO I'M REALLY NOT EVEN PREPARED TO DISCUSS IT.
>> NEXT WEEK DURING REGULAR SESSION WE WILL HAVE A MOTION
[10) MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS]
TO POSTPONE IT TO AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER WHATEVER YOU WANT.>> THANK YOU. >>JOE PITTS: ANYTHING ELSE REGARDING RESOLUTION 65? OKAY.
WE ARE NOW READY FOR THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS.
ANY MEMBER OF COUNSEL HAVE A COMMENT.
COUNCILPERSON REYNOLDS, YOU ARE RECOGNIZE.
>>KAREN REYNOLDS: THANK YOU. I WANTED TO TAKE A MOMENT AND TALK ABOUT THE BUDGET PROCESS WE HAVE BEEN THROUGH SO FAR. I HANDED OUT FOR THE CITY COUNCIL, I MADE A HANDOUT SHOWING MY REVIEW FOR ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE.
THERE ARE COPIES OF HERE.'M NOT GOING TO GO IN DEPTH.
I WANTED TO SHARE SOME OF MY CONCERNS OUT LOUD AND EXPRESS,
[00:30:01]
FIRST I WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS MY CLUNKY PROCESS FOR ADDRESSING MY CONCERNS FOR THE OVERALL BUDGET.I REALIZE THAT I PROBABLY DIDN'T EXPLAIN MY PROCESS OR MY THOUGHTS VERY WELL. AND I APOLOGIZE TO THE DIRECTORS AND OTHER PEOPLE FOR THAT.
I'M NOT GOING TO APOLOGIZE FOR LOOKING OUT FOR THE TAX INCREASE FOR OUR CITIZENS, BUT I DO APOLOGIZE FOR THE PROCESS.
NIC THAT WHOLEHEARTEDLY. SO I'M NOT GOING TO READ EVERYTHING HERE. I JUST WANTED THE COUNCILMEMBERS TO KIND OF KNOW WHERE I WAS COMING FROM AND MY THOUGHTS. SO OVER ALL OUR BUDGET HAS 11.8 PERCENT INCREASE FOR REAGAN THAT'S A 23.$9 MILLION INCREASE. IF ONE PENNY IS 3.4 Ã$343,000, THAT IS A GREAT AMOUNT OF INCREASE FOR US.
20S AND SO WE ARE LOOKING FOR IS $0.68 MILLION PER IN WE OF COVID FUNDS ON TOP OF ALL OF THE FOUR 1.7 BILLION DOLLARS OVER ALTERING ENDING, $9 MILLION FOR ARP FUNDS, WHICH WE HAVE TENTATIVELY APPROVED FOR USE.
WE HAVE ALSO HAVE COVID CARES ASKED, WHICH IS 1.7 MILLION OR 5.1 CENTS OF OUR TAX INCREASE. SO WE HAVE MONEY IN THE BANK IS WHAT I'M TRYING TO EXPRESS. OVERALL THE OPERATING EXPENSES OF OUR DEPARTMENTS AND PROGRAMS INCREASE THEIR BUDGET BY 10.4 MILLION DOLLARS OR 11.23 OR $0.30 OF OUR TAX DOLLARS.
WE'VE INCREASED OUR OPERATING BUDGETS BY $0.30 OF OUR TAXES.
WE ONLY TRANSFERRED 5.$2 MILLION OR 4.7 CENTS TO OUR CAPITAL FUNDS. THAT IS MY OVERALL CONCERN OF THE TOTALS. I'M TALKING TOTALS.
I WOULD LIKE TO SAY TO PARKS AND RECREATION THE I AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, I DO NOT SUPPORT DEFUNDING OR GOLF COURSES AT THIS TIME. I DO BELIEVE LATER WE MAY NEED TO TAKE A BETTER LOOK AT THAT, BUT DURING THE BUDGET PROCESS IS NOT THE TIME TO HAVE THOSE CONVERSATIONS.
AND I UNDERSTAND FOR OUR EMPLOYERS AND EVEN OUR RESIDENTS THAT THAT MAY HAVE BEEN A LITTLE DISTURBING AND I AM SORRY. THAT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT I WILL SUPPORT HER IN NOT SAYING THAT IN THE FUTURE I WON'T SUPPORT IT. I DON'T SUPPORT THAT CONVERSATION DURING THE BUDGET PROCESS.SO MY OTHER CONCERNS ARE WE HAVE 2.3 MILLION DOLLARS OF LINE ITEMS WE WILL HAVE TO BRING BACK INTO THE BUDGET. WE USE COVID MONEY TO FUND THE ROXY SENIOR CITIZENS AND THE MUSEUM.
IS A GENERAL LINE ITEMS THAT WILL NEED TO COME BACK INTO OUR BUDGET NEXT YEAR. ARE POLICE DISPATCH CHOSE TO NOT USE $827,000 OF THEIR PREVIOUS BUDGET BECAUSE THEY WERE GOING TO USE COVID MONEY TO REPLACE SOME OF THEIR VEHICLES THAT WERE AT THE LIMIT THEY HAVE A ÃI CAN'T THINK OF THE WORD. IT WAS TIME TO REPLACE THEM AND THEY HAVE A SCHEDULE IN THE USED COVID MONEY.
SO THAT IS ALSO A LINE ITEM THAT WILL HAVE TO COME BACK INTO NEXT YEAR'S BUDGET. MY CONCERN IS WE JUST SWELLED OUR BUDGET PROCESS TO TAKE UP THE 11.6 PERCENT AND WE INCLUDED THIS 2.3 MILLION IN OUR PROGRAM BUDGET INSTEAD OF SETTING IT ASIDE FOR A LATER DATE.
SOME OF THE OPPORTUNITIES WHERE WE ARE EXPANDING A STREET DEPARTMENT, WHICH I FULLY SUPPORT AND UNDERSTAND THAT WE HAVE NOT ADDED THE CREW SINCE 1998.
AND IT IS WELL PAST THE TIME. BUT THE MONEY THAT WE USED FOR THE COVID AND TO FUND THE ROXY AND THAT THE POLICE DIDN'T USE COULD HAVE BEEN USED FOR THE ONE-TIME PURCHASE OF THE VEHICLES TO STAND UP THIS NEW UNIT.
WE CHOSE NOT TO DO THAT. AND INSTEAD WE DID NOT FULLY FUND THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND TOOK MORE MONEY OUT OF THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN. AS I SAID, I JUST WANTED TO GO
[00:35:04]
DOWN. I'M NOT REQUESTING THE CUT BUDGET FUNDS. WHAT I'M ASKING THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE IS NOT TO SWELL THEIR BUDGETS AND USE ALL THE FUNDS. THAT IS HOW WE GOT INTO THIS POSITION IN THE FIRST PLACE.I WILL TELL THE I-40 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE IN GOVERNMENTAL BUDGET.I WORKED IN AND AROUND BUDGETS MY ENTIRE LIFE IN THE MILITARY AND AS A CIVILIAN. AND MAY NOT QUITE UNDERSTAND THE PROCESS, BUT I KNOW HOW TO SPEND YOUR IN MONEY BETTER THAN MOST OF THE ARMY PHARMACY TECHNICIAN.
WE WERE ALWAYS THE ONES ON STANDBY AT MIDNIGHT BEFORE.
BUT I'M REALLY JUST ASKING FOR A FOUR CENT DECREASE,WHICH EQUALS 1.$3 MILLION . THIS IS 10.6 OF THE 22 BUDGET INCREASE. 10.6 PERCENT OF THE $12 MILLION INCREASE. IT IS 1.1 PERCENT OF THE OVERALL BUDGET OR IT IS 1.3 PERCENT OF THE DEPARTMENT AND PROGRAMS OVERALL BUDGET. OR 13 PERCENT OF THE REQUESTED INCREASE. I'M NOT ASKING THE DEPARTMENTS OR CITY TO TAKE A BUDGET CUT. I'M ASKING THEM NOT TO SWELL TO THE MAXIMUM. AND SO AS WE MOVE FORWARD ÃI WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SAY, OUR NEXT BUDGET MEETING AT CITY COUNCIL PEOPLE, I'VE MADE MY STANCE CLEAR.
WE MAY NOT AGREE ON THAT IS OKAY.
I RESPECT THAT. BUT I HAVE COME OUT AND SAID HOW I FEEL. I HAVE SAID THIS SEVERAL TIMES OVER THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS INDICATING THAT I WANTED TO CENTER OUR VULNERABLE CITIZENS. IF YOU DON'T COME OUT, IF ALL YOU DO IS VOTE DOWN EVERYBODY'S IDEAS AND YOU DON'T COME OUT WITH YOUR OWN DOCUMENTED CONCERN, YOU SHOULD BE A YES VOTE. YOU DON'T GET TO THROW ALL YOUR STONES AND GRANDSTAND FROM YOUR SEAT AND NOT COME OUT WITH A BETTER IDEA.F YOU HAVE CONCERNS FOR THIS BUDGET, BRING THEM FORWARD. OBVIOUSLY PEOPLE ARE REALLY SUPPORTIVE OF MINE.ND I RESPECT THAT.
BUT AT LEAST I SET MINE OUT LOUD.
IF YOU DON'T COME AND SAY IT OUT LOUD, YOU SHOULD BE A YES VOTE. THANK YOU.
>>JOE PITTS: ANYONE ELSE? I WILL TELL THE MEMBERS OF COUNCIL, I WILL BE PRESENTING Ã SENDING OUT ANOTHER BUDGET PROPOSAL TOMORROW. WILL HAVE TO HAVE A SPECIAL SESSION, SORRY. TO CONSIDER IT.
WE CANNOT GO INTO A FISCAL YEAR WITHOUT AN APPROVED BUDGET.
AND THE OTHER COMMENTS FROM COUNSEL? WE ARE NOW READY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.NY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WISH TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL? HEARING ON AND SING NONE, WE STAND ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.