Aug 05, 2021 City Council

[1) CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:17]

>> I LIKE THE MEMBERS TO PLEASE STAND FOR THE PRAYER

AND THE PLEDGE. >> THANK YOU.

BOW YOUR HEAD FOR THE LORD'S PRAYER.

OUR FATHER, WHO ART IN HEAVEN.

THY KINGDOM COME THY WILL BE DONE.

LEAD US NOT TO TEMPTATION BUT DELIVER US FROM EVIL.

FOR THE KINGDOM AND THE POWER AND GLORY FOREVER.

AMEN. >> I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES STATE OF AMERICA.

AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS FOR ONE NATION UNDER GOD FOR LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

>> MEMBERS PLEASE REGISTER YOUR ATTENDANCE.

>> MADAM CLERK, TAKE THE ROLL.

[5) SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS]

MEMBERS AND LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, IT'S MY HONOR TO PRESENT TO COUNCIL PERSON SMITH IF YOU WOULD JOIN ME IN THE WELL. YOUR OBVIOUSLY SURPRISED.

WE ONLY HAVE ONE COUNCIL PERSON SMITH, DON'T WE.

YEAH. THIS PROCLAMATION DECLARING EMANCIPATION DAY IN OUR CITY. COUNCIL PERSON SMITH HAS WORKED HARD OVER THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS TO PREPARE SOME EMANCIPATION DAY ACTIVITIES.

IT'S MY HONOR THE TO PRESENT THIS TO YOU THAT WE WILL CONSIDER AUGUST 8TH, 2021 EMANCIPATION IN THE CITY OF CLARKVILLES. IT'S MY HONOR TO PRESENT THIS TO YOU. THANK YOU.

THIS IS AN HONOR. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. [APPLAUSE]

[6) PLANNING COMMISSION]

>> ALL RIGHT WE ARE NOW READY FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT. COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. THANK YOU, MAYOR.

WE HAVE EIGHT ITEMS ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT.

MADAM CLERK WILL YOU PLEASE READ THE ORDINANCES.

>> ORDINANCE 4-2021-22 FIRST READING AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE PERTAINING HISTORY AND DESIGN OVERLAY DISTRICT ORDINANCE 6-2021-22 FIRST READING AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, APPLICATION OF REDA HOME BUILDERS INCORPORATED FOR ZONE CHANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF TWIN RIVERS ROAD AND NOLEN ROAD FROM R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO R-4 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.

>> OR NANSZ 7-2021-22 FIRST READING AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE APPLICATION OF LYND ANN HOLT CONNER.

STANLEY ROKK. HARVILLE ROSS, PLLC, AGENT FOR ZONE CHANGE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED A INTERSECTION OF WILSON ROAD AND OLD FARMER ROAD FROM C-5 HIGHWAY AND ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND R-1 SINK L FAMILY RESZ DENTIAL TO R-5 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.

ORDINANCE 8-2021-22. FIRST READING.

AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE MAP OF THE CITY OF

[00:05:01]

HARVILLE ROSS, PLLC AGENT FOR THE ZONE CHANGE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AND INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 76 AND LITTLE HOME ROAD FROM R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO R-4 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.

>> ORDINANCE 9-2021-22. FIRST READING, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, APPLICATION FOR BRET AND PATRICIA LOGAN.

TIFFANY MCKETTHEN-AGENT FOR THE ZONE CHANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED INTERSECTION OF PETERSON LANE AND OLD TRENTON ROAD FROM AG AGRICULTURE DISTRICT TO R-1 SINGLE FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. >> ORDINANCE 10-2021-22 FRIST READING AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE APPLICATION SDRA HOLDINGS, LLC ALLEN MOSER AGENT FOR ZONE CHANGE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF FRANKLIN STREET AND HORNBERGER LANE FROM R-3 THREE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO C-2

GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. >> ORDINANCE 11-2021-2 # 2 FIRST READING. AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, APPLICATION OF THOMAS NEAL BATEMAN FOR ZONE CHANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF WILMA RUDOLPH BOULEVARD AND OLD TRENTON ROAD. FROM M-2 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO C-5 HIGHWAY AND ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.

>> OR ORDINANCE 12-2021-22 FIRST READING AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE APPLICATION OF BEN KIMBROUGH-RINGGOLD MILL PROPERTIES LLCBERST SINGLETARY AGENT FOR ZONE CHANGE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF FT. CAMPBELL BOULEVARD FROM MILLSWOOD DRY AND C-5 AND R-2 HIGHWAY ARTERIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND R-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO R-4 MULTIPLE

FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. >> COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN.

>> THANK YOU, MADAM CLERK. MAYOR I MOVE WE GO INTO

PUBLIC HEARING. >> SECOND.

>> MOTION HAS BEEN MADE TO GO INTO PUBLIC HEARING.

PROPERLY SECONDED. WE ARE IN PUBLIC HEARING.

FIRST ITEM ON OUR PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA IS ITEM ONE OR ORDINANCE 4-2021-22 HISTORY K DESIGN OVERLAY DISTRICT REGIONAL PLANNING RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF ORDINANCE 4?

>> ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK AGAINST ORDINANCE 4? SEEING NONE. WE'RE NOW READY FOR ITEM 2 ORDINANCE 6-221-22 AMENDING THE ZONE ORDINANCE MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARK LVILLE APPLICATION OF REDA HOME BUILDER. ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF ORDINANCE 6? MR. REDA.

IF YOU WOULD GIVE UR YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.

I'M RICKY REDA. I RUN REDA HOME BUILDERS.

I'M AT 2510 LYLEWOOD ROAD. W WOODLAWN, TENNESSEE. THIS WHOLE PROPERTY FEELS LIKE I HAVE A BIG BACK EYE ON IT.

ALL THE PROPERTY AROUND IT IN THE LAST YEAR HAS BEEN ZONED FOR R-4 OF WHAT IT NEEDS. IT'S WITHIN A BLOCK OF MY PROPERTY. WE'RE ALL ON THE SAME HIGHWAYS. OLD TRENTON ROAD GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT KNOWLEDGE ABOUT 21-FOOT WIDE.

IT'S A DOUBLE YELLOW LANE. THERE'S A YELLOW LANE TO KEEP PEOPLE FROM PASSING. IT'S THAT WIDE.

YOU GO TO NOLAND RIDE. IT'S 21 FOOT WITH DOUBLE LANE. IT'S THAT WIDE.

NOLAND IS NO LESS WIDER THAN OLD TRENTON ROAD.

I GO TO RED COAT RUN OFF OF MEMORIAL DRIVE, IT'S 21 FOOT.

WITH A YELLOW LANE. IT'S GOT WELL MORE TRAFFIC THAN NOLAND ROAD. I KEEP HEARING ABOUT THE TRAFFIC STUDIES AND THE ROAD PROBLEMS. I DON'T SEE THE PROBLEMS. ALL I SEE IS OTHER DEVELOPERS OTHER INVESTORS GETTING THEIR PROPERTIES ZONED AND WE'RE NOT GETTING THAT FAIR SHAPE. I ASK TONIGHT FOR THAT VOTE.

IN 2011 I COME INTO THIS CITY COUNCIL.

IT FILLED THE ROOM UP. THERE WAS NO MORE STANDING ROOM YOU HAD TO GO OUTSIDE IF YOU WANT TO STAY HERE.

I DEFERRED IT THAT NIGHT AND TOOK IT OFF THE BOARD.

I WAITED FOUR YEARS. I THOUGHT ITS TIME TO BRING IT BACK UP. I BROUGHT IT BACK UP IN 2015 AND I HAD A TRAFFIC STUDY THAT TALKED ABOUT I NEEDED RED LIGHT ON THE BOTTOM OF OLD TRENTON ROAD.

THAT I NEEDED TO DO SOMETHING WITH THE THREE-WAY INTERSECTION THAT THE TRAFFIC WAS HORRIBLE.

THIS IS 2015. SO IT GETS TURNED DOWN.

I WALK OUT AND I KINDLY TAKE MY PROPERTY AND I GO ALONG

[00:10:04]

THERE'S TWO OTHER PROPERTIES ON OLD TRENTON ROAD.

IT'S GOT MULTIPLE APARTMENTS COMING UP.

THERE WAS NEVER NO TALK ABOUT THE RED LIGHT AT OLD TRENTON ROAD. THAT KIND OF DISTURBS ME.

THE TRAFFIC STUDY WAS -- IF THERE WAS A TRAFFIC STUDY THEY TALKED ABOUT IN THE MEMORANDUM -- IF YOU COULD HOLD ON A MINUTE. MAY 7TH, 2020.

ORDINANCE NUMBER 75-2019-20. THIS THING GOT PASSED.

THERE'S SUPPOSED TO BE A TURNING LANE ON THAT HIGHWAY.

IT'S IN THE MINUTES IT'S IN THIS.

IT'S IN THIS ORDINANCE. I DON'T SEE NO TURNING LANE OUT THERE. I DON'T SEE ANY OF IT.

ALL I SEE APARTMENTS GOING UP.

USUALLY INFRASTRUCTURE HAS TO BE UP FOR THE BUILD RING BUILT. THEN I COME AROUND IN NOVEMBER. THAT WAS MAY 7TH 2020.

I COME AROUND IN OCTOBER OF 2021 AND I'M TURNED DOWN 7-5.

I WILL REMIND EVERYBODY ON THE MAY 7TH VOTE OF 2020, IT WAS 12-0, 12 YESES. ZERO NOS THERE WASN'T ONE PERSON AGAINST IT. I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY BACK HERE TODAY. I THINK IT'S IRRELEVANT.

I THINK IT'S TIME TO PUT ME IN THE BALLOT.

LIKE EVERYONE ELSE. I COULD GO ON AND ON.

WE RAISED OUR TAXES 60 DOES AGO.

WE DONE THAT SO WE COULD HAVE BETTER INFRASTRUCTURE.

OUR ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE. IT'S HERE NOW.

IT'S TIME TO JUST MAKE THE RIGHT VOTE GUYS.

YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? >> THANK YOU MR. REDA.

ANY MEMBER HAVE A QUESTION? >> SEEING NONE.

THANK YOU, SIR. >> THANK YOU.

>> ANYONE ELSE WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF ORDINANCE 6?

>> ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK AGAINST ORDINANCE 6. WE HAVE ROOM FOR TWO.

IF YOU WOULD PLEASE APPROACH. LIEUTENANT GILL, WE MAY NEED HELP WITH THE HANDHELD MIC, PERHAPS.

PLEASE GIVE US YOUR NAME, ADDRESS AND YOU HAVE FIVE

MINUTES. >> MY NAME THE KATHERINE

MCINTEE. >> IS HER MIC ON.

IF YOU CAN HOLD IT CLOSER. >> OKAY.

55 WEST DRIVE. AND THE TRAFFIC IS TERRIBLE ON OLD TRENTON ROAD. I DON'T SEE -- THE ROAD IS NOT I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU GET TO 21 FEET OUT OF THAT.

THERE AREN'T ANY YELLOW LINES.

YOU KIND OF HAVE TO GUESS AT IT.

WHICH IT'S NOT THAT BAD. IF YOU DON'T HAVE ALL THAT MUCH TRAFFIC. BUT WE'RE GETTING MORE AND MORE. I DON'T KNOW HOW THE APARTMENTS GOT APPROVED ACCEPT WE COULDN'T GET IN MAYBE IT WAS LAST MAY. WE TRIED TO COME BUT THEY WOULDN'T LET US IN. I DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS OVERCROWDED OR WHAT. WE WOULD HAVE SPOKEN AGAINST IT THEN. AND FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND THE APARTMENTS THAT ARE THERE, THE NEWER ONES ARE SUPPOSED TO BE GOING OUT NOT ON OLD TRENTON ROAD.

I BELIEVE IT -- THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BE GOING ON THAT NEW I CAN'T THE NAME OF THE ROAD.

I THOUGHT IT WAS SPENCER OR SOMETHING.

THEY WEREN'T SUPPOSED TO COME OUT ON OLD TRENTON ROAD FROM THAT APARTMENT BUILDING. MAYBE THAT'S WHY IT GOT PASSED. I DON'T KNOW.

BUT I KNOW THAT OLD TRENTON ROAD IS OVER -- THEY PUT THOSE OTHER APARTMENTS IN ON THE HILL AND THEY JUST KEEP GOING. THEY GO ALL AROUND.

YOU KNOW, CLARKSVILLE -- I'VE LIVED HERE THIS TIME SINCE 1969. SINCE 1973 I HAVE LIVED IN

[00:15:04]

AND GROWTH IS GOOD SOMETIMES. BUT WHEN YOU'RE UPROOTING A LOT OF TREES IN PLACES THAT WILD ANIMALS DEER, FOXES AND RACOONS. RACCOONS MAY EXIST NO MATTER.

YOU KNOW, WE HAD A FOX COMING UP TO OUR DOOR EATING CAT FOOD THAT WE PUT OUT. AND RACOON, TOO SINCE THEY STARTED BUILDING THE NEW APARTMENTS.

YOU KNOW THEY TORE DOWN A LOT OF TREE.

WE HAVE TO HAVE TREES TO BREATHE.

I MEAN, DO YOU GUYS NOT UNDERSTAND THAT?

>> TREES ARE HOW WE BREATHE. PLANT H HOW WE BREATHE.

YOU KEEP KNOCKING THEM DOWN. YOU KNOW, WE KEEP REPOPULATING AND REPOPULATING AND REPOPULATING, BUT THEY ARE NOT -- THEY ARE NOT ADDING ANY TREES.

SO THE TREES YOU KNOW YOU CAN GO OUT FOR A PICNIC WITH YOUR FAMILY. WE GOT PARKS.

WE'VE GOT PLACES TO GO. BUT ANYWAY, OBVIOUSLY I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF MORE APARTMENTS AND ANYWAY, RIGHT NOW I'M AT

A LOSS. >> THANK YOU MISS MCINTEE.

ANY MEMBER HAVE A QUESTION? SEEING NONE ANY OTHER MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK AGAINST ORDINANCE 6.

>> OUR RULES ALLOW FOR REBUTTAL IN YOU SPOKE IN FAVOR AND WOULD LIKE TO ADD REBUTTAL TO WHAT HAS BEEN SAID, YOU ARE ASKED TO APPROACH.

SEEING NONE. WE ARE NOW READY FOR ITEM 3 ORDINANCE -- I'M SORRY. MR. REDA, I DIDN'T SEE YOUR

HAND. >> MR. REDA, YOU HAVE THREE

MINUTES FOR REBUTTAL. >> I DO WANT TO RECOGNIZE THIS PROPERTY RIGHT NOW I COULD PUT 16 TRAILERS ON IT.

IT WOULDN'T TAKE NOTHING TO THROW 16 TRAILERS AND WE'RE STUCK WITH TRAILER PARK FOR 40 YEARS.

DON'T WANT TO THROW IT AT THAT BECAUSE IT'S BEEN LIKE THAT FOR 11 YEARS. THAT'S OUT THERE.

THE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMITTEE IN 2015 ITS 11-1.

11 YESES AND ONE NO. IN 2010, 10 NOS AND TWO YESES. WE GO INTO 2020 OF MAY 7TH WITH OTHER ZONING A BLOCK AWAY.

12-0 GUYS. JUST WANTED TO THROW.

12 YESES. ZERO NOS.

I'M LOOKING FOR FULL BOARD TO GET THIS YES ACROSS THE BOARD. THANK YOU, GUYS.

>> THANK YOU. >> WE'RE READY FOR ITEM THERE OR ORDINANCE 7-2021-22. SIR REBUTTAL.

IF YOU SPOKE AGAINST ORDINANCE 6 YOU ARE ALLOWED TO SPEAK AND REBUTT WHAT HAS JUST BEEN SAID.

MCMCINTEE DO YOU WISH TO SPEAK?

>> YES. YOU ALL HAVE THREE MINUTES

THIS TIME. >> YOU KNOW I'M SURE IN WOODLAWN THERE'S LOTS OF NICE PLACES FOR ANIMALS AND LOTS OF TREES AND IT'S JUST REALLY BOTHERS ME THAT -- I MEAN I DON'T MIND HAVING A FOX COME TO MY DOOR.

OR A RACOON. BUT KNOWING THAT THEY ARE UP

[00:20:05]

I REALLY, REALLY DON'T LIKE IT, THE TRAFFIC.

IT'S JUST -- MAYBE I BETTER STOP.

SORRY ABOUT THAT. I'M JUST REALLY AGAINST ANY MORE BUILDING -- MAYBE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

BUT NOT APARTMENTS. I MEAN WE'VE GOT ENOUGH APARTMENTS HERE AT LEAST I THINK WE DO.

THAT'S A PERSONAL OPINION, THOUGH.

I GUESS THAT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER THAT MUCH.

THANKS FOR YOUR TIME. >> THANK YOU MISS MACINNTEE.

WE'RE READY FOR ITEM 3 ORDINANCE 7-2021-22 AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE APPLICATION OF LYNDA ANN HOLT CONNER STANLEY ROSS HARVILL ROSS. GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS

AND YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES. >> THANK YOU MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS. I'M STANLEY ROSS.

107 WEST THIRD STREET. I'M HERE ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT ON BEHALF OF THIS MATTER.

THIS WAS APPROVED AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVED BY THE FULL COMMISSION.

AT THE COMMISSION HEARING THERE WAS NO PUBLIC OPPOSITION. I DON'T THINK THERE WAS ANY COMMENTED OPPOSITION PRIOR TO THAT EITHER.

WE WOULD JUST ASK YOU TO APPROVE THIS.

AS THE STAFF AND THE COMMISSION HAVE DONE AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I WILL BE GLAD TO ANSWER THEM

>> THANK YOU, MR. ROSS. ANYBODY HAVE A QUESTION?

>> SEEING NONE. ANY OTHER MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF ORDINANCE 7?

>> ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK AGAINST

ORDINANCE 7. >> SEEING NONE WE'RE READY FOR ITEM 4, ORDINANCE 8-2021-22.

AMMING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE APPLICATION OF KRUECKEBERL, LLC STANLEY ROSS HARVILLE ROSS. ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK IN

FAVOR? >> YOU KNOW THE DRILL.

>> NAME AND ADDRESS. >> ONCE AGAIN MAYOR COUNCILMEMBERS STANLEY ROSS, 107 NORTH THIRD.

I'M REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT.

THIS WILL SOUND FAMILIAR. WE DID HAVE STAFF APPROVAL AT THE COMMISSION LEVEL AND AT THE -- STAFF LEVEL AND THE COMMISSION LEVEL. THERE WAS NO PUBLIC OPPOSITION AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING.

WE WOULD ASK YOU APPROVE THIS APPLICATION AS WELL.

IF YOU ALL DO HAVE QUESTIONS, I WILL BE GLAD TO TRY TO

ANSWER THEM AS BEST WE CAN. >> ANY MEMBER HAVE A QUESTION

OF MR. ROSS? >> THANK YOU, SIR.

>> ANY OTHER MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK IN

FAVOR OF ORDINANCE 8? >> ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK AGAINST ORDINANCE 8?

>> WE ARE NOW READY FOR ITEM 5.

ORDINANCE 9-2021-22. AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE, APPLICATION OF BRET AND PATRICIA LOGAN. ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF ORDINANCE 9? PLEASE IF YOU WOULD APPROACH GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS

AND YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES. >> MY ADDRESS 4 COOINGTON STREET. I'M THE AGENT FACILITATING THE TRANSACTION. WE ARE ASKING FOR THE PROPERTY TO BE REZONED FROM AGRICULTURE TO R-1.

>> ANY MEMBER OF COUNCIL HAVE A QUESTION OF HER?

>> COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> COULD YOU SPEAK BRIEFLY, I THINK -- I BELIEVE THIS ONE WHERE THERE WAS SOME CONCERNS AROUND -- COULD YOU WALK US THROUGH THAT AND GIVE US SOME INCITE?

>> SURE. I DO HAVE THE ENGINEER.

I THINK THEY WERE WORRIED ABOUT THE BUFFER ZONE.

I SPOKE WITH ENGINEER HE SAID THAT MOST OF SUBDIVISIONS UTILIZE CLUSTER OPTION ALONG THE BOUNDARY.

>> WOULD THAT FULLFILL THE CONCERN THAT THEY HAD.

I THINK IT WAS AROUND? >> I BELIEVE SO.

I THINK -- YEAH. I THINK THAT'S WHAT THEY

ASKED FOR WAS 25 FOOT BUFFER. >> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND.

COUNCIL PERSON REYNOLDS YOU HAD A QUESTION?

[00:25:02]

>> I HAD REACHED AND WE CHATTED ABOUT THIS.

BECAUSE IT'S IN MY DISTRICT. AND I'VE ALSO REACHED TO APS ALL AND THERE'S AN INTEREST TO ACTUALLY CREATE A WALKWAY CIRCLING THE FARM. AND AS WELL AS THEY ARE GOING TO ADDRESS THE DRAINAGE, THE ENGINEER ALSO BROUGHT THAT UP. BECAUSE THAT WAS IN THE NOTE THE DRAINAGE AND THEY WOULD IMPROVE THE DRAINAGE.

AND THE ENGINEER ALSO SAID THAT IF THERE'S AN INTEREST WITH THE CITY AND THE COLLEGE THAT THEY WOULD WORK WITH US.

THAT'S A LOT OF GREEN SPACE CONNECTING SEVERAL NEIGHBORHOODS WITH THE EVENTUALLY MAYBE TO THE BLUEWAY. I'M GOING TO BE WORKING ON THAT AS WELL. I DID REACH OUT AND I THANK YOU FOR WORKING WITH ME ON THAT.

>> YES, THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF

MISS MCKEITHAN. >> ANY OTHER MEMBER WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF ORDINANCE 9?

>> SEEING NONE. ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE

WISH TO SPEAK ORDINANCE 9? >> IF YOU WILL GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES.

>> I'M TOM HUSHIN, 2485 BLOCK ROAD.

I'M EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF PHYSICAL PLAN OF AUSTIN B.

RESOLVING WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THIS CHANGE IN USE.

MAINLY BECAUSE OF TWO ITEMS ONE OF THEM BEING THE DRAINAGE FROM THIS PROPERTY THAT'S CURRENTLY WOODED PROPERTY THAT WE'RE GOING TO POTENTIALLY HAVE 41 WE'VE GOT DRAINAGE PROPERTIES AT THE FARM.

THE SWALE THAT RUNS THROUGH THE PROPERTY THERE IS ERODING

AND ANOTHER >> WE WANT TO PROTECT WHAT IS GOING ON, ON THE FARM IN TERMS OF RESEARCH AND AGRICULTURE. I WANT TO CONSIDER IF THAT'S REZONED. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. MY MEMBER OF COUNCIL A

QUESTION FOR MR. HUTCHINS? >> COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND

YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >> SPEAK TO COUNCIL AND HELP US UNDERSTAND HOW IT IS CURRENTLY WORKING.

THEY MAY NOT MIND LIVING NEXT TO A FARM SPEAK ABOUT THE CURRENT CLIMATE ABOUT WHAT'S HAPPENING OR MAYBE THE WORKABILITY BETWEEN CURRENT RESIDENTS.

YOU SPOKE OF ENCROACHMENT CONCERN.

ARE CURRENT RESIDENTSES OR NEIGHBORS CURRENTLY ENCROACHING ON THE PROPERTY. CAN YOU SPEAK TO THAT?

>> I CAN. IF IT'S OKAY I WOULD ASK DON SUDBURY FROM THE COLLEGE IF THAT'S APPROPRIATE TO HAVE

HIM ANSWER THAT QUESTION. >> I THINK YOU'RE IN THE

BARREL. >> THANK YOU.

>> HE CAN SPEAK AFTER YOU. >> THAT WILL BE THE SECOND PERSON. WE HAVE PROBLEMS AT TIMES WITH POACHERS. ESPECIALLY ON THE NORTH PART OF THE FARM WHICH IS A MUCH MORE WOODED AREA.

WE GOT GATES UP. WE'VE GOT FENCING UP.

WE HAD SOMEONE THAT TOOK A TRUCK OR FOUR-WHEELER AND PULLED THE GATE DOWN. WE GOT A COUPLE OF SPOTS ON THE NORTH SIDE NEAR THE TRAILER PARK THAT THERE'S BEEN MORE TROUBLE WITH PEOPLE WONDERING IN.

SOME OF IT IS NOT INTENTIONAL.

SOME OF IT HAVE VERY INTENTIONAL.

>> THERE ANYTHING THE UNIVERSITY HAS DUNG HAVE DONE WITH THE RESOURCE. COULD YOU SPEAK TO THAT.

WHAT PREVENTATIVE MEASURE DID YOU IMPLEMENT IN THE PAST?

>> ABSOLUTELY. PRETTY MUCH THE ENTIRE FARM IS EITHER GOT ELECTRIC FENCING OR BARBED WIRE AROUND THE PERIMETER. AND FEW PLACES WHERE THERE'S ACCESS FROM THE ROAD WE'VE GOT LOCKED GATES.

WE STILL HAVE TROUBLE OCCASIONALLY WITH PEOPLE.

[00:30:06]

IS THERE LIVESTOCK? >> COWS HORSES?

>> MOSTLY COWS. PRIMARILY COWS.

>> THANK YOU COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND.

COUNCIL PERSON REYNOLDS YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> I'M KIM REYNOLDS. I REACHED OUT BY E-MAIL.

I WOULD LIKE TO SIT DOWN WITH YOU SIR IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS AND DISCUSS -- I HAVE -- LIVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. OBVIOUSLY IT'S IN MY WARD.

I WOULD LIKE TO WORK CLOSELY WITH YOU TO SEE IF YOU CAN

FIND A RESOLUTION. >> A LONG-TERM.

NOT JUST A QUICK FIX. >> MAYBE ONE OF EACH.

>> THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER MEMBER OF

COUNCIL HAVE A QUESTION? >> ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK

AGAINST ORDINANCE 9? >> SEEING NONE WE'RE NOW

READY FOR ITEM 6 ORDINANCE -- >> OH, YES I'M SORRY.

PLEASE FORGET ME. GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. JOYCE HUMMIST.

I LEAVE 243 PETERSON LANE. MY PROPERTY IS ADJACENT TO IT. NORTH AND THE EAST.

AND WE LIVE ON 6.6 ACRES. NOT REALLY EXCITED ABOUT IT.

BUT I DON'T OPPOSE IT. I JUST WANT TO BE -- IT TO BE CONSIDERED AS A FARM IS SAID A BUFFER BETWEEN OUR PROPERTY AND WHERE THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE ESTABLISHED.

RIGHT NOW THERE'S SOME REALLY NICE TREES AND BETWEEN OUR NEIGHBORS AND US AND IT'S VERY YOU KNOW THE CLIMATE IS VERY NICE. THERE'S A RAVINE NORTH OF MY PROPERTY THAT IS ON THEIR PROPERTY.

IT'S VERY LOW SPOT. AND WHEN WE HAVE A LOT OF RAIN IN OUR AREA, THAT RAINWATER GOES DOWN INTO THAT RAVINE AND THAT'S NOT REALLY A CONCERN.

IF THERE'S A DEVELOPMENT THERE, IT COULD BE A CONCERN.

I JUST WANT IT TO BE CONSIDERED AS FAR AS JUST HOPEFULLY THEY MAINTAIN SOME OF THOSE TREES BETWEEN US AND THE NEW DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE MEMBERS? SEE -- COUNCIL PERSON REYNOLDS YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. I THINK THERE WAS A QUESTION.

IF YOU WILL COME BACK. >> HI.

I'M KARIN REYNOLDS. I'M THE COUNCIL PERSON.

HAVE YOU NOTICED INCREASE IN RUN OFF SINCE THEY HAVE BUILT UP ON THE CORNER OF WHITFIELD AND PUT IN THE NEW HOUSES HAS

THAT DONE ANYTHING? >> NO, MA'AM.

>> THANK YOU. ANY OTHER MEMBER HAVE A QUESTION. SEEING NONE, WE ARE NOW READY FOR REBUTTAL IF YOU SPOKE IN FAVOR OF THIS ORDINANCE.

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO COME AND ADDRESS ANYTHING THAT'S BEEN SAID IN REBUTTAL. PLEASE COME AND YOU HAVE

THREE MINUTES. >> YES.

JUST SOME COMMENTS FROM THE ENGINEER.

HE DID MAKE A COMMENT THAT STORMWATER WILL BE SLOWED TO PREDEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS BY UTILIZING DETENTION BASIN WHICH WOULD HOLD A PREDETERMINED VOLUME OF WATER AND SLOWLY RELEASE IT SLOWER THAN CURRENT CONDITIONS.

>> OKAY. THANK YOU.

COUNCIL PERSON -- I THINK WE HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU.

COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MAYOR.

COULD YOU REMIND ME AGAIN WE HAVE SO MANY CASES HERE WHAT IS THE PROPOSED USE OR THE PROJECTED USE? HOW MANY -- MULTIFAMILY? WAS IT?

>> SINGLE FAMILY. >> SINGLE FAMILY.

HOW MANY UNITS ARE WE TALKING ABOUT?

>> ABOUT 40. >> OKAY.

THANK YOU. ANY OTHER MEMBERS HAVE A

QUESTION? >> THANK YOU.

IF YOU SPOKE AGAINST ORDINANCE 9 AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO REBUTT ANYTHING THAT'S BEEN SAID PLEASE APPROACH AND YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES.

OKAY. SEEING NONE.

WE ARE NOW READY FOR ITEM 6 ORDINANCE 10-2021-22, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE. APPLICATION SDRA HOLDINGS.

LLC ALLEN MOSER AGENT. ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF ORDINANCE 10?

>> SEEING NONE. ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK AGAINST

ORDINANCE 10? >> ITEM 7 ORDINANCE 11-2021-22 AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE. APPLICATION OF THOMAS NEAL BATEMAN FOR ZONE CHANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF WILMA RUDOLPH BOULEVARD AND OLD TRENTON ROAD. ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR

OF ORDINANCE 11? >> MR. BATEMAN, IF YOU WOULD PLEASE APPROACH GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND YOU HAVE

FIVE MINUTES? >> I'M THOMAS BATEMAN.

I LIVE 310 PEARTREE DRIVE. I RELY UPON MY APPLICATION

[00:35:04]

>> THANK YOU, SIR. MY MEMBER OF COUNCIL HAVE A

QUESTION OF MIR BATEMAN. >> THANK YOU, SIR.

>> THANK YOU. ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK AGAINST ORDINANCE 11?

>> SEEING NONE. WE'RE READY FOR ITEM 8, ORDINANCE 12, 2021-22 AMENDING THE ZONING OF THE MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE APPLICATION OF BEN KIMBROUGH-RINGGOLD MILL PROPERTIES.

ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR? MR. SINGLETARY. IF YOU GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES.

>> I'M WITH SINGLETARY CONSTRUCTION.

127 CENTERPOINT DRIVE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR

ME. >> ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. SINGLETARY. THERE WAS CONCERN ABOUT ONE WAY IN AND ONE WAY OUT OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.

ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THAT? ISSUE?

>> YES. YES.

>> IF YOU COULD ADDRESS THAT. >> OKAY.

THERE MAY BE SOME POSSIBILITIES DURING THE DESIGN PHASE THAT WE CAN CREATE SOME ALTERNATIVE WAYS IN AND OUT. THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE KIND OF

CONSIDERED. >> OKAY.

THANK YOU. ANY OTHER MEMBER OF COUNCIL HAVE A QUESTION FOR MR. SINGLETARY?

>> SEEING NONE. THANK YOU, SIR.

>> ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK IN

FAVOR OF ORDINANCE 12? >> PLEASE GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES.

MAYOR COUNCIL. WE'RE IN THE SINGLETARY CONSTRUCTION WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.

I THINK AS YOU HEARD AND KNOW THAT THE BULK OF THE PROPERTY RIGHT NOW I'VE TALKED TO DR. MURPHY.

SHE'S A NEIGHBOR. I'M SURE SHE WILL BE SPEAKING THERE'S QUESTIONS ABOUT DRAINAGE.

WE'RE WELL AWARE ABOUT THE DRAINAGE SITUATION.

WE'LL LOSE ABOUT 6 ACRES OF THE PROPERTY BEING DEVELOPED.

AROUND THE PROPERTY'S DRAINAGE.

THEIR RUN OFF. TRAFFIC THE ONE WAY IN, ONE WAY OUT. THERE'S A THAT'S AN ISSUE CONNECTION TO TIMBER LINE AND CALLAWAY TO SOLVE THAT ISSUE.

I THINK SOMEONE BROUGHT UP SIGHT DISTANCE.

WE ANALYZED THAT. THERE'S OVER 575 FEET OF SIGHT DISTANCE WHICH EXCEEDS THE STREET DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS. IF YOU WILL GO ALONG WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AND COMMISSION VOTED R-4 ZONING IS MORE SUITABLE THAN WHAT'S THERE NOW.

WE HOPE YOU AGREE WITH HIM AND VOTE ACCORDINGLY.

>> ANY MEMBER OF COUNCIL HAVE A QUESTION FOR MR. MCKAY.

>> COUNCIL PERSON LITTLE, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. HAS THERE BEEN ANY DISCUSSION WITH THE BUSINESSES THAT ABOUT MAYBE ANY TYPE OF

HINDRANCE? >> YES, THERE HAS.

THERE'S NO OBJECTIONS BUT I THINK IT'S A LITTLE BIT PREMATURE TO DO IT AT THIS TIME.

MAYBE HANDLE IT AT SIGHT PLAN APPROVAL.

>> NOT KNOWING WHAT MR. -- WHAT MR. SINGLETARY'S LAYOUT IS. THERE ARE I THINK 8 OR 9 POTENTIAL PROPERTIES. BUT THEY ARE ALL OCCUPIED AND HAVE TENANTS. THERE WILL BE SOME NEGOTIATIONS WITH THEM TO TRY TO GET ANOTHER ACCESS.

THERE'S ALSO -- THERE MAY BE AN ISSUE WITH NOT MEETING ACCESS ORDINANCE TOO. BUT DEFINITELY BEING CONSIDERED. AND NO OBJECTIONS AT THIS

TIME. >> OKAY.

THANK YOU. >> COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND,

YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >> THANK YOU, MAYOR.

THANK YOU FOR THAT. MR. MCKAY.

>> I THINK THE MAJOR CONCERN THAT I SEE AND I GOT SEVERAL CALLS ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT.

SEEMING TO BE SPEEDING OR THE CONCERN FOR SAFETY IN THE DEVELOPMENT, ALSO I THINK IT'S 18.2 ACRES.

>> YES, SIR. >> COULD YOU SPEAK A LITTLE BIT IF IT DIDN'T CUT THE ZONING, WHAT -- WHAT'S SPECULATION THERE? WHAT COULD GO THERE AND HOW WOULD THAT IMPACT OR MAY OR MAY NOT ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF

[00:40:01]

>> THAT'S THE MAIN POINTS. I'M NOT SURE I WOULD EXPLAIN IT WELL. CURRENTLY MOST OF IT IS C-5.

IT'S COMMERCIAL; CORRECT? >> YES, SIR.

>> UNDER THE CURRENT ORDINANCE EVERY COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LISTED IN THE ORDINANCE CAN GO ON C-5.

WE'RE TALKING FROM RACETRACK TO BAR NIGHTCLUB, TOW-IN LOTS. MOBILE HOME SALES.

ALL OF THEM LARGER GENERATES MORE TRAFFIC.

RUN OFF. LIGHTS, ET CETERA.

WE FEEL LIKE THIS IS A DOWN ZONE.

AND FEEL LIKE IT'S LET IMPACT THAT'S WHAT'S CURRENTLY ZONED. THE SIDEWALK, I THINK I CAN'T RECALL, MAYOR YOU MAY BE ABLE TO SPEAK TO THIS.

I WAS CURIOUS. DIDN'T FIND ANYTHING CONCLUSIVE AROUND WHAT WE HAVE AS FAR AS TO ADDRESS THE SIDEWALK CONCERNS IN TERMS OF TRAFFIC 2020 PLAN.

>> T-DOT HAS BEEN PROMISING AND WE HOPE THEY WILL LET A CONTRACT FOR SIDEWALKS UP AND DOWN FT. CAMPBELL BLVL THIS YEAR. WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT I THINK NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES SIDEWALKS. MR. MCKAY COULD PROBABLY ADDRESS. THIS WILL BE A PRIVATE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT, WHICH FROM OUR DISCUSSIONS MR. SINGLETARY, HE WILL PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT.

THERE'S SOME MENTION ABOUT THE SIDEWALK TO THE ELEMENTARY WHICH WILL BE CONSIDERED.

BUT YEAH. STREET DEPARTMENT ALWAYS HAS THE ABILITY TO ASK FOR SIDEWALKS ALONG THERE.

>> COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND, DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR

QUESTION >> THANK YOU.

COUNCIL PERSON SMITH, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> MISS MCKAY. I KNOW YOU STATED YOU ARE GOING ERECT PRIVATE MULTIFAMILY FACILITIES OR RESIDENT. HOW MANY DO YOU PLAN TO PUT

THERE? >> WE'RE LOSING ABOUT 6 ACRES OF IT. AND SO WITH NORMAL DENSITY WE

LOOK AT 140 TO 160. >> APARTMENT OR CONDITIONERS?

>> APARTMENT ARE THERE ANY OTHER APARTMENTS IN THAT

RESIDENTIAL AREA? >> THERE'S SOME ADJACENT ON RINGGOLD; BACK UPPED TO IT. SO THEY DOWN THE STREET? BUT NOT IN THAT PARTICULAR AREA?

>> I THINK RIGHT NEXT TO RINGGOLD.

IT'S ON RINGGOLD BUT IT CLOSELY BACKS UP TO THIS

PROPERTY. >> DO YOU KNOW ABOUT HOW MANY

ACRES APART? >> I DON'T KNOW, MA'AM.

>> THANK YOU. >> YOU'RE WELCOME.

>> THANK YOU. ANY OTHER MEMBER HAVE A

QUESTION FOR MR. MCKAY? >> THANK YOU, SIR.

ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE WISH TO SPEAK ORDINANCE 12.

WE HAVE ROOM FOR TWO. DR. MURPHY IF YOU WOULD PLEASE GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.

YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES. >> THANK YOU MR. MAYOR.

COUNCILMEMBERS. I'M DR. GENE SCOTT MURPHY.

I LIVE 26 LEONARD DRIVE MILLSWOOD SUBDIVISION WITH MY HUSBAND DR. HORI MURPHY JUNIOR.

WE MOVED INTO THIS SUBDIVISION AFTER IT WAS BUILD IN THE LATE 70S. THE AREA WE LIVE THIS IS SHAPED LIKE A BOWL. FOR OVER FOUR DECADES, WE HAVE ALL OBSERVED WHAT HAPPENS WHEN NATURAL WATER FLOW AND DRAINAGE IS COMPROMISED BY HEAVY RAINS AND ADDITIONAL ROOFTOP ASPHALT RUN OFF.

WE REMEMBER WHEN THE STORM KATRINA MADE ITS WAY PAST OUR STATE. AND OF THE STORMS DUMPED UP BELIEVABLE HEAVY RAINS IN OUR AREA.

WE HAVE WITNESSED AS THE RAIN DRAIN INTO THE LAND REQUESTING THIS REZONING. AND WE HAVE WITNESSED HOW THIS LAKE OF WATER HAS DRAINED FOLLOWING ITS OWN NATURAL FLOW. ADDITIONAL MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT WILL COMPLICATE EXISTING NATURAL FLOW OF WATER. WE HAD OUR PERSONAL ENGINEER TO COME OUT TO OUR HOME AND HE SAID WORDS THAT WE NEVER FORGET. THE WATER IS GOING TO FLOW.

BECAUSE YOU LIVE IN A BOWL. WE NEVER FORGET THAT.

THE STORM RUN OFF AND DRAINAGE HAS ALREADY CREATED MANY AGE-OLD SINKHOLES AND DRAINAGE.

NATURE DID THAT TO PROTECT THE AREA.

THERE'S A LARGE SINKHOLE THAT IS SHARED BY THE REAR FENCE

[00:45:06]

WE SEE THE STATE DEPARTMENT WHEN THEY COME OUT RACING AFTER A HEAVY STORM. THEY IMMEDIATELY WANT TO MAKE SURE NOTHING IS BLOCKING THAT NATURAL DRAINAGE.

AND WE APPRECIATE THAT. IF THIS FLOW IS INTERRUPTED OR IMPEDED, FLOODED, FLOODING WILL HAPPEN IN OUR CUL-DE-SAC AND IN OUR HOMES. WITHOUT ADDITIONAL PUMPING STATIONS, OR ELEVATION, CONTAINER FOR GRAVITY TO FLOW THE SEWAGE. WHERE WILL THIS ADDITIONAL 100 PLUS USERS WHERE WILL THAT GRAY WATER END UP?

>> AT THE END OF THE DAY, WE ARE SURE FOR ONE THING BECAUSE THE ONE THING THAT WE DO KNOW ALL THAT DRAINAGE FROM THE ENTIRE MILLWOOD SUBDIVISION AND THOSE EDGES BORDERING OUR COMMUNITY INCLUDING THE RINGGOLD SCHOOL. WE KNOW FOR SURE ALL THIS DRAINAGE WILL MAKE ITS WAY TO THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSTRUCTION IN THE REZONING AREA.

TO THIS EFFECT WE HAVE SUBMITTED PETITIONS, SIGNATURES OF RESIDENTS WHO ALSO HAVE WITNESSED WHAT WE WITNESSED. IT DID GOT TAKE A STUDY TO TELL US THIS. WE SAW IT WITH OUR OWN EYES.

IT'S FOR THIS REASON WE ASK YOU TO VOTE NO TO THIS REZONING. WE ALSO ASK YOU TO CONSIDER WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO THAT BEAUTIFUL GREEN SPACE.

WE'RE REQUESTING A 25-FOOT BUFFER.

BECAUSE THAT'S WHY WE'RE LITTLE UNIQUE PLACE WE ARE.

IT'S QUIET. WE KNOW EVERYBODY.

MOST PEOPLE DON'T KNOW WE EXIST THERE.

BECAUSE OF THAT BUFFER OF THOSE TREES.

WE ASK THAT, THAT BE CONSIDERED.

SO NOW WE ASK YOU THE CITY COUNCILMAN AS YOU MOVE AND GO BACK TO YOUR OWN HOMES WE ASK YOU TO REFRAIN FROM A NO VOTE OR DEFER VOTING UNTIL YOU CAN COME OUT AND VISIT AND MEET WITH THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN THIS BOWL CALLED MILLSWOOD SUBDIVISION. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR

TIME >> THANK YOU DR. MURPHY.

ANYONE HAVE A QUESTION FOR DR. MURPHY.

>> COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I'M TRACKING.

THE COMMUNITY REQUEST 25-FOOT BUFFER.

25-FOOT BUFFER. TREE BUFFER, BECAUSE SO MANY OF THOSE TREES ARE BANKED RIGHT AGAINST THE HOMES OF THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE THERE. AND IN OUR CASE THOSE OF US WHO LIVE ON THE DRIVE IT TOTALLY BUFFERS THAT WHOLE AREA THAT WRAPS AROUND OUR WHERE WE LIVE AND THAT'S WHERE ALL THOSE BIG SINKHOLES ARE.

THEY GET A LOT OF WATER. >> IF THIS 25-FOOT BUFFER WERE ADDRESSED BY THE DEVELOPER WITH THE COMMUNITY, THEN BE IN FAVOR OF OR ARE THERE OTHER REQUEST.

>> WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE SOMETHING ASSURE US NOTHING WILL BLOCK THAT FLOW OF WATER.

BECAUSE IT HAS NOWHERE ELSE TO GO.

IF SOMETHING SHOULD HAPPEN THAT INTERFERES WITH THAT FLOW OF WATER, THE ONLY PLACE IT WILL GO IS IN OUR CUL-DE-SAC INTO OUR HOME. I BELIEVE THE CITY IS AWARE OF THAT. THAT'S WHY THEY SENT CREWS OUT THERE IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE HEAVY RAIN.

WHENEVER 125 SPACE FOR 125 ADDITIONAL PEOPLE APPEAR, AND NEW BUILDINGS WITH ROOFTOP RUN OFF, ET CETERA, ET CETERA. THAT INCREASES THE FLOW OF WATER THAT'S GOING TO COME DOWN TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BOWL WHERE THE DRIVE IS AND THAT'S WHERE WE LIVE.

>> OKAY THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR THAT CLARITY.

>> THANK YOU. COUNCIL PERSON SMITH, YOU ARE

RECOGNIZED. >> THANK YOU.

>> DR. MURPHY. HOW FAR IS THE SINKHOLE FROM YOUR AREA OF RESIDENCE? HOW FAR FROM YOUR --

>> WE LIVE 26. THERE'S A SINKHOLE IN THE BACKYARD THAT MEETS RINGGOLD AT NUMBER 29.

AND ACROSS THE STREET FROM OUR HOME, IS DIRECT LUE ACROSS THE STREET FROM OUR HOME WHEN YOU MOVE ACROSS THE STREET AND YOU WALK SEVERAL FEET THERE'S A CELL PHONE TOWER. AND ACTUALLY ABOVE THAT AREA, THAT'S WHERE THE SINKHOLES ARE.

BECAUSE WHEN WE RAISE OUR CHILDREN NO ONE ALLOWED THEIR CHILDREN TO PLAY THERE. WE KNEW THE SINKHOLES WHERE THERE. WE WERE AFRAID SOMEONE WOULD FALL IN AND WE WOULD NEVER SEE THEM.

THEY ARE RIGHT THERE BECAUSE OUR KIDS PLAYED THERE.

[00:50:01]

>> OKAY. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. ANY OTHER MEMBER OF COUNCIL HAVE A QUESTION FOR DR. MURPHY.

SEEING NONE WE'RE READY FOR THE ANYONE ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WISHES TO SPEAK ORDINANCE TWELVE, PLEASE APPROACH AND GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND YOU HAVE

FIVE MINUTES. >> MY NAME APRIL ODEM.

I LIVE 1809 CALLAWAY DRIVE. I WANT TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE TRAFFIC CONCERNS ABOUT THIS NEW DEVELOPMENT.

OUR NEIGHBORHOOD IS AROUND 50 HOMES.

SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON HALF ACRE LOT.

ADDING IN 140 TO 160 UNITS IT'S GOING TO INEVITABLY INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THAT WE'RE SEEING.

OKAY. IT'S OVER 180% INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTS. THAT'S IF ONLY ONE PERSON LIVES IN THAT APARTMENT. IT'S A HUGE CHANGE.

IT'S NOT ONLY GOING TO CHANGE THE TRAFFIC BUT IT WILL CHANGE THE DYNAMIC OF OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

WE'RE PRIMARILY HOMEOWNERS AND LONG-TERM RESIDENT.

WE WILL NOW BECOME A RENTER'S NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND ALL THOSE OTHER THINGS THAT COME ALONG WITH THAT.

WE'RE HIGHLY INVESTED IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

IF YOU COME THROUGH YOU SEE MANICURED LAWNS AND WELL TAKEN CARE OF. WE WAVE TO OUR NEIGHBORS AND SPEAK TO OUR NEIGHBORS. THAT WILL CHANGE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SIZE IN THAT AREA.

ONE OF THE CONCERNS I WILL TALK ABOUT THE TRAFFIC A LITTLE BIT MORE. MILLSWOOD DRIVE THE ONLY WAY IN AND OUT OF OUR NEIGHB

NEIGHBORHOOD. >> AND IT EMPTIES OUT ON TO FT. CAMPBELL BOULEVARD. RIGHT NOW IF WE TRY TO GO TO WAL-MART DOWN THE STREET OR GET ON 101ST WE HAVE TO SHOOT ACROSS AND MAKE A LEFT TURN AGAINST 7 LANES OF TRAFFIC IN ORDER TO GET ON 101ST. I COMMUTE TO NASHVILLE FIVE DAYS A WEEK TO WORK. AND I HAVE TO SHOOT ACROSS THAT IN ORDER TO GET TO ANY THE EXITS.

AND SO I THINK WELL FOR SURE WE'RE GOING TO SEE INCREASE IF THEY BUILD ON THAT LAND, WE'RE GOING TO SEE INCREASE.

I SPOKE TO SOMEONE FROM STREET DEPARTMENT.

HE MENTIONED THAT THE NEW ZONING WOULD REDUCE THE NUMBER OF TRAFFIC BASED ON THE ZONING.

SOMETHING LIKE THAT. I'M SORRY.

I DON'T QUITE UNDERSTAND IT. BUT RIGHT NOW YOU HAVE TO CONSIDER ANYTHING BUILT ON THERE IS GOING TO INCREASE OUR AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC. BECAUSE RIGHT NOW THERE'S NOTING THERE. IT'S JUST US.

IT'S ONLY RESIDENTS. THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS AND VISITOR WHOSE ARE COMING IN AND LEAVING OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

NO ONE ELSE IS COMING 32 THERE.

IT'S GOING TO BE A DRAMATIC INCREASE EITHER WAY THAT YOU LOOK AT IT. OUR STREETS DON'T HAVE SIDEWALKS. SO OUR KIDS HAVE TO WALK THROUGH THE STREETS TO GET TO THEIR SCHOOL BUSES.

THEY PLAY IN THE STREETS AND WE KNOW THE TRAFFIC PATTERNS.

WE'VE LIVED THERE. WE KNOW WHEN THEY PLAY OUTSIDE. WE KNOW WE NEED TO GO LESS THAN 20 MILES PER HOUR DOWN OUR STREET.

WE KNOW WHERE THE KIDS ARE PLAYING.

BASKETBALL IN THE STREETS. AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE CONTINUE. BUILDING AGAIN 140 TO 160 UNITS THE AVERAGE RESIDENT HOUSEHOLD IN CLARKSVILLE, TENNESSEE HAS ABOUT 2.66 PEOPLE IN THAT HOUSEHOLD.

IT'S NOT GOING TO BE JUST 140 EXTRA PEOPLE IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD. IT'S GOING TO BE 372.

IN AN AREA THAT HAS ONE ENTRANCE AND ONE EXIT.

WITH A STOP SIGN, NO TRAFFIC LIGHT.

STOP SIGN TO GET MAKE A LEFT TURN ON FORTH CAMPBELL BOULEVARD. IT'S DANGEROUS.

IT'S DANGEROUS FOR US. EVERY DAY WHEN WE DO IT.

BUT IT'S ONLY -- THERE'S 50 HOMES.

IT'S A LOT LESS DANGEROUS. WE CAN WAIT THE EXTRA FIVE MINUTES FOR CLEARING. WHEN YOU HAVE 372 PEOPLE ARE THEY GOING TO WAIT OR TAKE SOME CHANCES TO GET ACROSS TO GET TO WAL-MART OR GET THEIR KIDS TO SCHOOL ON TIME.

THAT'S WHAT I'M SCARED ABOUT. I DON'T WANT TO SEE MY NEW NEIGHBORS GETTING HURT. I DON'T WANT TO SEE PEOPLE IN DANGER OFF CAMPBELL BOULEVARD BECAUSE OF A DEVELOPMENT.

WE'RE NOT TRYING TO OPPOSE DEVELOPMENT OR PROGRESS.

WE UNDERSTAND THAT CLARKSVILLE HAS A NEED FOR HOUSING. BUT WE ARE ASKING FOR RESPONSIBLE HOUSING. THINKING PAST THE NEXT TWO YEARS. WE NEED TO BE CONSIDERING HOW THIS WILL IMPACT THE TRAFFIC FLOW ON FT. CAMPBELL BOULEVARD. HOW IT WILL IMPACT THE NEIGHBORHOOD OVERALL AND IN RESIDENTS ALL AROUND US.

WE'VE GOT HOUSES DEVELOPMENT POPPING UP ALL OVER THE PLACE THAT ARE CONTRIBUTING TO THAT TRAFFIC ON FT. CAMPBELL BOULEVARD AND 101ST. I'M ASKING YOU TO CONSIDER THIS THESE CONCERNS THAT WE HAVE THAT ARE LEGITIMATE.

AND CAN'T BE EXPRESSED ON A ZONING DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE.

THEY ARE NOT GOING TO -- THEY ARE TAKING AERIAL VIEW OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THEY DON'T LIVE THERE.

THEY DON'T ACTUALLY HAVE TO GET OUT OF NEIGHBOR AT 5:30 IN ORDER TO GET KIDS SOMEWHERE.

YOU KNOW. THAT'S US.

I ASK YOU TO CONSIDER OUR CONCERNS.

COME OUT AND VISIT THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

[00:55:01]

YOU WILL SHARE SIMILAR CONCERNS.

THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS ODEM.

COUNCIL PERSON SMITH, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> THANK YOU FOR SHARING YOUR CONCERNS.

THANK YOU FOR SURING YOUR CONCERNS.

WHAT COULD YOU LIKE TO SEE? I KNOW YOU IF VOTE TO ACCEPT THIS ORDINANCE, WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE?

>> I THINK -- I WOULD PREFER TO SEE SOMETHING CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBOR. I UNDERSTAND ITS HIS LAND.

I WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOMETHING MORE CONSISTENT.

IF IT MOVED TO SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THAT ARE IN SIMILAR LOT SIZES AS US. WE HAVE HALF ACRE LOTS.

IF IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THAT. THAT'S TEN OR 12 HOMES.

THAT WILL NOT DRAMATICALLY IMPACT THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE TRAFFIC PATTERN. THAT'S GOING TO DRAMATICALLY IMPACT THE SCHOOL BUSES HAVING TO GET IN AND OUT OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD FROM RINGGOLD ELEMENTARY.

I THINK THAT IF THIS HAS TO GET APPROVED, WHICH I UNDERSTAND I WOULD PREFER TO SEE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES BUILT ON THAT LAND. THAT WOULD CONTRIBUTE TO MORE HAVING MORE HOMEOWNERS. PEOPLE INVESTED IN OUR

NEIGHBORHOOD. >> THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER MEMBER OF THE COUNSEL HAVE A QUESTION?

>> YOU'RE RECOGNIZED. >> TALKING ABOUT WHAT YOU WOULD PREFER TO HAVE THERE. I DO WANT TO POINT OUT, YOU KNOW, THAT I THINK IT'S PREVIOUSLY POINTED OUT, YOU KNOW IT'S ZONED FOR COMMERCIAL.

I MEAN YOU COULD HAVE COMMERCIAL OPPORTUNITIES GOING IN THERE WHICH I MEAN IN THINKING BACK TO PREVIOUS SPEAKER THIS BEING DOWNGRADE. I THINK MORE PREFERABLE TO RESIDENTIAL PEOPLE BEING OVER THERE THAN COMMERCIAL BUSINESS MOVING CLOSER INTO YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, WHICH WOULD AS THE STREET DEPARTMENT I BELIEVE EXPLAINED WOULD BE HIGHER LEVEL OF TRAFFIC THAN WHAT YOU WOULD SEE WITH THIS APARTMENT.

I MEAN, I WOULD FEEL LIKE AS IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED COULD POSSIBLY BE MORE IF IT WAS BUILT UP THE WAY IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED. COULD POSSIBLY BE MORE DETRIMENTAL. EVERYTHING YOU REFERENCED.

>> THE CONCERN ABOUT -- IF IT'S ON RIGHT THEY WILL BUILD 150 TO 160 APARTMENT. IF THEY TALK ABOUT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES YOU WOULDN'T SEE ME HERE.

. >> UNDERSTAND.

I'M TALKING ABOUT WHAT IT IS ZONED.

WHAT IT IS ZONED. I UNDERSTAND COMMERCIAL.

NO ONE IS IN THERE. WE DON'T HAVE ANYBODY IN THERE RIGHT NOW. IT'S BEEN ZONED THAT WAY FOR YEARS. AND NO ONE DEVELOPED IT COMMERCIALLY. I CAN'T SPEAK TO IT.

IF SOMEONE COMMERCIALLY WOULD MOVE IN THERE.

I WOULDN'T SAY ANYTHING. IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED THAT WAY. BUT I THINK I'M I'M JUST FOCUSED ON WHAT THEY ARE TRYING TO DEVELOP IT FOR.

>> I UNDERSTAND. JUST KIND OF THINKING ABOUT THE PREFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED AS COULD BE AT THIS POINT. OR WHAT IS BEING SUGGESTED.

AS BEING ZONED. >> YES.

>> OKAY. THANK YOU.

ANYONE ELSE HAVE A QUESTION FOR MRS. ODEM?

>> THANK YOU. WE'RE NOW READY FOR REBUTTAL.

IF YOU SPOKE IN FAVOR OF ORDINANCE 12 AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO APPROACH AND OFFER REBUTTAL FOR WHATEVER WAS SAID; YOU CAN APPROACH THE WELL.

WE HAVE ROOM FOR ONE. GIVE US YOUR NAME.

YOU THREE MINUTES. JUST REAL QUICK.

THE DRAINAGE SITUATION I SPOKE ABOUT BEFORE.

AND DR. MURPHY ALSO SPOKE ABOUT IT.

IT'S KIND OF OPPOSITE OF WHAT WE ARE USED TO.

THIS PROPERTY ACTUALLY ACCEPTING EVERYBODY ELSE'S DRAINAGE. WE'RE NOT RUNNING IT OFF ON ANYONE ELSE. WE -- THE SITUATION WILL END UP BEING BETTER BECAUSE WE WILL HOOK ON TO THE PIPES THAT COME UNDER THE ROAD. DRAIN THEM THROUGH THE PROPERTY. AND DRAINING THEM TO THE EXISTING CLUSTER OF SINKHOLES THAT THEY MENTIONED.

AND LIKE I SAID WE'LL LOSE ABOUT SIX ACRES OF THE 18 TO ACCOMMODATE FOR THIS DRAINAGE.

COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN, I BELIEVE ADDRESSED THE DIFFERENCE IN C-5 AND R-4. I FEEL LIKE THE R-4 IS MORE APPROPRIATE. THE PLANNINGS COMMISSION STAFF BOTH AGREE WITH THAT. BUFFERS, THERE'S LANDSCAPE BUFFERS REQUIRED NO MATTER WHAT THE ZONING IS.

THOSE WILL BE ADHERED TO. I THINK THAT'S ALL THE QUESTIONS. UNLESS SOMEONE ELSE HAS ONE.

COUNCIL PERSON LITTLE, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

MR. MCKAY THANKS FOR THE INFORMATION YOU'VE GIVEN US.

ONE QUESTION. I SEE THAT AND THEY BROUGHT

[01:00:03]

THAT? >> THAT'S GOING TO BE MORE AREA THAT WE'LL LOSE. 200 FOOT CELL PHONE TOWER.

WE'LL HAVE TO LEAVE A CLEAR ZONE OF 200 FOOT RADIUS.

IT'S NOT PART OF THE ZONING. THERE WON'T BE ANY STRUCTURES

WITHIN 200 FEET OF IT. >> OKAY THANK YOU.

>> COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

I BELIEVE YOU ADDRESSED IT. THAT WAS IN REFERENCE TO THE BUFFER. I KNOW THERE WAS YOU KNOW CONSIDERABLE CONCERN WITH TRYING TO KEEP THAT AND OBVIOUSLY WITH THAT RIGHT ON THE PROPERTY LINE AND BEING PART OF THE BUFFER, I MEAN WOULD THOSE TREES STAY THERE? THAT YOU KNOW THEY ARE REQUESTING?

>> WE'RE NOT GOING TO TAKE MORE TREES THAN WITH HAVE.

WHATEVER IS DISTURBED IF IT ENCROACHES IN THAT BUFFER

THEN WE HAVE TO REPLANT THEM. >> WITH THOSE BEING SINKHOLES. I DON'T THINK YOU COULD DO

MUCH ANYWAY. >> ONE MORE THING QUESTION ASKED. THE ONE WAY IN AND ONE WAY OUT. I THINK WE GOT TWO SOLUTIONS TO THAT. THEY CAN BE ADDRESSED AT SITE

PLAN. >> COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND

YOU HAVE QUESTIONS. >> THAT WAS MY CONCERN.

I THINK FOR ME THE ONLY THING THAT THE BIGGEST THING THAT REALLY CAUSES ME PAUSE IS THE ONE WAY IN ONE WAY OUT.

THAT JUST SOUNDS LIKE A VERY, VERY CONCERNING SITUATION AROUND PUBLIC SAFETY. I BELIEVE IT'S ON CUL-DE-SAC.

THAT'S A LOT OF RESIDENTS WITH ONE WAY IN AND ONE WAY OUT. THAT'S A BUSY INTERSECTION.

IF IT DIDN'T PASS, WHAT COULD YOU SPEAK TO US MAYBE ABOUT HOW YOU MIGHT ADDRESS SO THE RESIDENCE THAT ARE HERE CAN HEAR THIS AND WE CAN -- I KNOW YOU WON'T GET IT SOLVE TONIGHT. I THINK THAT'S MY BIGGEST CONCERN. IS THAT ONE WAY EGRESS.

>> THERE'S DEFINITELY A WAY. AND 300 RESIDENTS.

THAT'S A HUGE CONCERN. THAT'S SAFETY.

CHILDREN, PUBLIC SAFETY. FI FIRES POLICE OFFICERS GETTING IN AND OUT.

IT'S PART OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATION ABOUT HOW MANY SINGLE FAMILY LOTS CAN GO IN AND OUT.

WITH ONE WAY. BUT THERE'S AN EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT COULD CONNECT TIMBERLINE AND CALLAWAY TO NORTH PARK. AND THEN WE'RE ALSO LOOKING AT ANOTHER ACCESS THROUGH ONE OF THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES TO GET TO FT. CAMPBELL BOULEVARD.

>> COULD YOU WALK US THROUGH. TIMBERLINE AND CALLAWAY COULD

BE MADE. >> I SEE THE TIMBERLINE.

I SEE THE C-5 PROPOSED PLAT HERE.

YOU SAY TO GET FROM YOU SAY TIMBERLINE.

COMES OFF NORTH PARK. THERE'S AN APPROVED CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. EASILY CONNECTED RIGHT THERE THAT GIVES YOU ANOTHER INGRESS, EGRESS.

THEN LIKE I SAID PROPERTY OWNERS ALONG FT. CAMPBELL BOULEVARD DIDN'T HAVE OBJECTION.

THERE'S SOME THINGS THAT NEED TO GET WORKED THROUGH.

IT'S A LITTLE BIT PREMATURE AT THIS TIME.

COUNCIL PERSON ALLEN DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION?

>> YES, I HAVE A QUESTION. AS FOR THAT ROAD RIGHT THERE THAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. I DID A DRIVE BY THIS WEEKEND. WE LOOKED AT THE ZONING CASE.

WE RODE THROUGH THERE. YOU TALK ABOUT THE ROAD RIGHT THERE THAT GOES BACK INTO THE PROPERTY?

>> THERE'S SOME REFLECTORS ON BOTH SIDES.

THEN -- YOU GO DOWN FURTHER THERE'S A CUL-DE-SAC.

IT'S A CUL-DE-SAC WHEN YOU GO FURTHER.

>> IT'S LIKE A MOAT GRASS AREA.

IT'S GRAVEL ROAD. >> IT'S GOT REFLECTORS ON BOTH SIDE TO KEEP PEOPLE FROM DRIVING BACK AND FORTH.

>> OKAY. THANK YOU.

>> YOU'RE WELCOME. >> ANY OTHER MEMBER HAVE A QUESTION FOR MR. MCKAY. SEEING NONE, THANK YOU, SIR.

WE WILL ALLOW SIR REBUTTAL WHICH ALLOWS ONE PERSON WHO SPOKE AGAINST ORDINANCE 12. IF YOU WOULD APPROACH THE WELL AND GIVE US YOUR NAME AND YOU HAVE THREE MINUTES.

>> THANK YOU MR. MAYOR. MY COMMENT IS ACTUALLY APPLIES TO TIMBERLINE AS THE POSSIBLE WAY OUT AS A

[01:05:04]

AND THIS IS ACCORDING TO HIS -- ALMOST A QUOTE.

THE DECISION TO BLOCK TIMBERLINE WAY FROM ENTERING CALLAWAY DRIVE IS BASED ON THE STREET DEPARTMENT REVIEW OF THE STREET IN QUESTION. AFTER SEVERAL INSPECTIONS OF THE AREA, THE DRAINAGE PROBLEM WAS TOO PROBLEMATIC.

THEREFORE AS OF THIS DATE, ACCORDING TO MR. STEWART, THE STREET WILL NOT BE OPEN AS THROUGHWAY TO CALLAWAY DRIVE.

THEY WILL HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM WITH DRAINAGE.

DRAINAGE PROBLEM THERE. IT WAS CONTINUING TO STILL FLOW BACK DOWN INTO THE BOTTOM OF THE BOWL.

THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU, MAYOR.

I MOVE WE GO BACK INTO REGULAR SESSION.

>> MOTION BEEN MADE AND PROPERLY WE GO BACK INTO REGULAR SESSION WITHOUT OBJECTION WE ARE NOW IN REGULAR SESSION. COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN.

>> AS REMINDER ALL MOTION UPON THE ADVICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL SHOULD BE FOR APPROVAL.

I MAKE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL. >> SECOND.

>> MOTION MADE AND PROPERLY SECONDED FOR APPROVAL OF OR NANSZ 4. YOU HAD A QUESTION OR COMMENT

ABOUT FOUR? >> YES.

I DO. I WAS CONTACTED BY A RESIDENT AND I WOULD LIKE TO CONSIDER POSTPONING THIS ORDINANCE UNTIL SEPTEMBER. ONE EXAMPLE AND TO REVIEW SOME OF INSTANCES INSIDE OF THE ORDINANCE.

ONE EXAMPLE IS RECENT APPROVAL OF A BUILDING OF MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE ON FIRST STREET.

PER THE CHART ON PAGE 173 OF OUR AGENDA.

THE DOG HILL AREA SHOULD ONLY ALLOW SINGLE FAMILY BUILDING.

I UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE OLDER HOMES HAVE BEEN SUBDIVIDED AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IF WE ARE GOING TO AMEND THE ORDINANCE. THE RESIDENTS HISTORICAL DISTRICTS IMPEACH OLDER HOME AND INVEST A GREAT DEAL OF MONEY TO MAINTAIN HISTORICAL HOMES.

WE AS CITY LEADER SHOULD RESPECT THIS.

THERE'S SEVERAL RESIDENTS IN THIS HISTORICAL DISTRICT THAT INDICATE THIS MULTIFAMILY RESIDENT THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE HISTORICAL COMMISSION DOES NOT FIT INTO THE HISTORICAL DISTRICT DESIGN.

THE APPEALS PROCESS IN THIS ORDINANCE INDICATES THAT CITIZENS MUST RETAIN LEGAL COUNCIL AND SUE THE CITY IF THEY DISAGREE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION.

IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING HISTORICALLY THIS ALLOWED THE CITIZEN TO ADDRESS CITY COUNCIL AND FOR US TO VOTE.

I WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE THAT WE RETURN ON THE LANGUAGE.

WHICH SHOULD NOT REQUIRE A CITIZEN TO SUE US BEFORE THE OPTION OF BEING ABLE TO ADDRESS US AND VOTE ON AN ORDINANCE. THIS ONE EXAMPLE BROUGHT TO ME. THERE'S A FEW OTHERS.

I WOULD LIKE TO ASK M MR. TINDEL, I KNOW THAT OVERALL, WE REVIEWED THIS BECAUSE THERE WAS STATE REQUIREMENTS TO CHANGE LANGUAGE.

BUT I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S NO PROBLEM WITH REQUESTING THAT WE POSTPONE THE VOTE UNTIL SEPTEMBER SO I CAN FURTHER REVIEW THIS AND PERHAPS MEET WITH HIS STAFF.

>> WE WOULD NEED A MOTION AND A SECOND TO POSTPONE UNTIL

SEPTEMBER. >> I MOVE TO POSTPONE.

>> SECOND. >> MOTION MADE TO POSTPONE ORDINANCE 4 TO SEPTEMBER 2ND. REGULAR SESSION.

AND PROPERLY SECONDED. COUNCIL PERSON REYNOLDS YOU ARE MAKER OF MOTION. I WILL GO BACK TO YOU.

>> IS THERE A DEADLINE THAT'S MY CONCERN THAT THERE MIGHT BE A DEADLINE AT THE STATE THAT WE HAVE TO MEET?

>> THERE IS A DEADLINE. I CAN'T RECALL MR. BAKER.

YOU WERE GOING TO -- JUST GIVE ME ONE SECOND.

IN THE ZONING CODE SECTION 11.4 DEALING WITH AMENDMENTS, SUBSECTION 2 -- OR SORRY, 3 -- IT REQUIRES THAT ANY PROPOSED AMENDMENTS SUPPLEMENT MODIFICATION OR

[01:10:02]

>> OKAY. IT'S LEGAL.

I THINK THE QUESTION WAS FOR MR. TINDEL ABOUT THE

DEADLINE. >> YES.

MAYOR. BECAUSE WHEN HE PRESENTED THIS HE INDICATED THAT THE STATE HAD INFORMED HIM THAT SOME OF THE LANGUAGE HAD TO BE CHANGED.

I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT INTERFERING WITH THAT. WHATEVER THE DIRECTIVE OF THE

STATE WERE. >> I WILL ALLOW MR. TINDEL COME AND ANSWER THAT QUESTION AND THEN GET BACK TO THE

MOTION TO POSTPONE. >> I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN THAT THE CONSTITUENTS IN DOINGHILL HAVE.

WE'VE MET WITH SOME OF THEM IN THE PREVIOUS SEVERAL WEEKS ABOUT THAT DECISION. WE CAN TALK ABOUT THAT A LITTLE BIT MORE. MY CONCERN WITH THE DEFERRAL MEAN WE PUT A SECOND READING INTO OCTOBER AT THAT TIME.

THE STATE PUT A VERY SPECIFIC DEADLINE ON US OF SEPTEMBER 1, ALL THESE ORDINANCES IN THE ENTIRE STATE ARE NULL AND VOID AS OF SEPTEMBER 1 IF YOU DON'T ACT.

MY CONCERN IF WE DEFER THIS FOR THE CONCERN OF ONE OR TWO RESIDENTS, THEN WE'RE PUTTING THE ENTIRE DOWNTOWN GUIDELINES IN JEOPARDY OF NOT HAVING ANY GUIDELINES FOR A MONTHS PERIOD. OF WHICH I WOULD REALLY -- THAT WOULD GIVE ME A LOT OF PAUSE TO WORRY ABOUT WHAT COULD HAPPEN IN ALL OF OUR DESIGN DISTRICTS WHILE WE HAVE NO RULES OVER THE PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER IF THIS DOESN'T GET PASSED. I WOULD LIKE TO PASS IT AND THEN CONTINUE TO WORK ON INDIVIDUAL ISSUES IF THERE ARE ISSUES. THE CHANGES WE BROUGHT TO YOU WERE JUST THE MINOR CHANGES THAT THE STATE REQUIRED.

WE HAVEN'T OVERHAULED. I DON'T THINK IT'S THE TIME TO TINKER WITH INDIVIDUAL TENCES AT THIS TIME.

I WOULD RATHER GET IT PASSIONED SO WE'RE LEGAL AND THEN WORK ON THE BIGGER PICTURE.

>> COUNCIL PERSON REYNOLDS. >> ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU. >> OKAY.

WE HAVE A MOTION TO POSTPONE IN FRONT OF US.

YOU'VE HEARD FROM MR. TINDELL REGARDING THE TIMING OF THIS.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENT REGARDING THE MOTION TO POSTPONE? SEEING NONE WE VOTE ON THE MOTION I'M SORRY DOWN COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND YOU ARE

RECOGNIZED. >> BASED TO THE FEEDBACK OF THE SPONSOR OF THE AMENDMENT. I JUST GOT CURIOUS WHAT THE SPONSOR OF THAT AMENDMENT THE POSTPONEMENT COULD SHE WEIGH

IN. >> IS THAT A QUESTION FOR THE

SPONSOR? >> YES, SIR.

>> COUNCIL PERSON REYNOLDS? >> YES.

THAT'S MY CONCERN. THAT WAS THE QUESTION I WANTED TO ASK BEFORE I MOTIONED.

I WOULD -- I WILL REACH BACK OUT AND START WORKING ON THIS INDIVIDUALLY. BUT I IF THERE'S A DEADLINE TO THE STATE, THEN I WOULD SAY WE SHOULD NOT PASS THIS AND MOVE FORWARD. THANK YOU FOR ASKING.

>> I APPRECIATE IT. >> OKAY.

THANK YOU. COUNCIL PERSON REDD, YOU ARE

RECOGNIZED. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?

>> ALL RIGHT. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE FOR OR GENOA -- AGAINST POSTPONEMENT.

>> TWO YES. NINE NOS.

ZERO ABSTAIN. MOTION TO POSTPONE FAILS.

WE'RE BACK ON THE ORIGINAL MOTION IN FAVOR OF ORDINANCE 4. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENT COUN ORDINANCE 4. SEEING NONE, ARE YOU READY TO VOTE? ALL MEMBERS, CAST YOUR VOTE.

EVERY MEMBER VOTED. MY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE

THEIR VOTE? >> WE HAD A MOTION.

EVERY MEMBER VOTE. ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE THEIR VOTE. MADAM CLERK, TAKE THE VOTE.

9 YES, TWO NOS. ZERO ABSTAINED.

ORDINANCE 4 ADOPTED. COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN, YOU'RE RECOGNIZED. 6-2021-22 FIRST READING.

[01:15:01]

YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >> YES.

I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS A COUPLE OF THINGS.

FIRST I HANDED OUT THE IMAGES THAT I TOOK TODAY OR YESTERDAY WHEN I DROVE TO THE CORNER.

I HEARD MR. REDA'S COMMENT. BUT THE ISSUE IS NOT NECESSARILY THE APARTMENTS. IT'S THE IDEA THAT WE ARE NOT MAINTAINING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE AS WE MOVE FORWARD. WHEN WE KNOCK ON DOORS OR CAMPAIGN. WE HEARD ABOUT TRAFFIC, SIDEWALKS AND GREEN SPACE. LAST WE JUST VOTED FOR 20-CENT INCREASE TO BUILD SIDEWALKS.

WE FAILED TO MAINTAIN HISTORICALLY.

THESE TRAFFIC ISSUES DEVELOPED OVER THE YEARS BECAUSE PREVIOUS LEADER IN THE COMMUNITY DIDN'T HAVE A VISION OR LOOK UP FROM A SINGLE ZONING TO LOOK AT THE BIGGER PICTURE. WE MUST WORK TOGETHER IN THE COMMUNITY TO DO A BETTER JOB ACKNOWLEDGE AND RESPECT THE CONCERNS OF CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE FUTURE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS. WE ARE ELECTED TO BUILD A CITY THAT PROTECTS OUR RESIDENTS AS WE MOVE FORWARD WE PROTECT RESIDENT AND SUPPORT SMART GROWTH.

MEMBERS OF COUNCIL HAVE INDICATED THEY DON'T WANT TO TELL PEOPLE WHAT TO DO WITH THEIR PROPERTY.

BUT WE ARE LITERALLY BUILDING A CITY AND THAT WE MUST SUPPORT TRANSPORTATION AND OFFER EQUITIABLE HOUSING FOR RESIDENTS. IF YOU LOOK AT THE IMAGES; THE FIRST SEVERAL OF THEM I'M STANDING IN ONE POSITION AND THEN IS ON THE CORNER OF WEST DRIVE.

I I'M LOOKING AT THE FIRST IMAGE YOU SEE TWO DUMP TRUCK AT THE CORNER OF NOLAND ROAD AND OLD TRENTON.

BEHIND THE DUMP TRUCKS IS LITERALLY THE BUS STOP.

FOR THE APARTMENTS. AS YOU LOOK ACROSS THE STREET IT'S NOT NECESSARILY THE APARTMENT BUILDING ON NOLADN NEW RESIDENT OF 170 UNIT BEING BUILT ON OLD TRENTON.

THERE'S NO ACCESS, ONLY BACK ON TO OLD TRENTON FOR ALL OF UNITS. WHEN I REVIEWED THE TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT THEY DID NOT TALK ABOUT THESE NEW APARTMENT IN THE TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT. THEIR ONLY DISCUSSION WAS THE ESTABLISHED TRAFFIC CURRENTLY.

IF YOU GO DOWN TO THE LAST IMAGE, THE LAST TWO IMAGES, THEY ARE TAKEN FROM THE NEW ROAD THAT HAS BEEN BUILT WHICH IS CALLED SUMMIT CREST. WE DID NOT TAKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONNECT TO SUMMIT CREST IN THIS NEW BUILDING. AGAIN, AND THE PROPERTY OWNER ALSO HAS ACCESS BACK OVER TO WILMA AND THEY DID NOT PUT ACCESS FROM THESE APARTMENTS BACK OVER TO WILMA.

ONLY ON OLD TRENTON BOULEVARD.

THE ISSUE IS THE THREEWAY THAT WE HAVE NOW BUILT UP.

WE HAVEN'T LEFT ANY SPACE FOR SIDEWALKS OR AIMPROVEMENT.

AND AS PART OF THE PROPOSAL THERE'S NO PROPOSAL IN THESE APARTMENT BUILDING TO MOVE DOWNSIDE WALK ALONG NOLAND INTO THE BUS STOP INTO THE OTHER AREAS.

SO WHAT I'M ASKING IS THAT WE AS A CITY COUNCIL START PLANNING, GOT JUST APPROVING INDIVIDUAL PLANS.

IF -- I UNDERSTAND GROWTH. I'M NOT OPPOSED TO APARTMENTS. I'M NOT OPPOSED TO ANY OF THESE KIND OF BUILDINGS. I RESPECT THAT.

OUR YOUNGER GENERATION. THEY DON'T WANT THE BIG HOUSE WITH THE BIG YARD. THERE'S NO WALKABILITY.

THEY CAN'T WALK TO THE BUS STOP.

SUPPOSED TO BE A AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

WITH NO WALKWAY. RIGHT ALONG RUDOLPH.

AT THE OTHER END OF THIS PROPERTY AS I SAID LAST TIME WE HAVE A COLLEGE. WE ARE NOT LOOKING UP AS WE MOVE FORWARD. IF WE'RE GOING TO DO THIS AND WE NEED TO SAY OKAY WE'RE GOING TO APPROVE THIS.

BUT WE'RE ALSO GOING TO PUT IN A SIDEWALK.

-- THIS WILL BE PART OF THE PLANNING.

WE NOW HAVE 20 CENTS OF TAX PAYER DOLLARS.

[01:20:02]

AND AS BUILT UP INTO THE ROADS RIGHT UP TO THE SIDE OF THE ROADS WE DON'T LEAVE SPACE.

I ASK THAT BECAUSE WE HAVE NOT -- BECAUSE WE DIDN'T ADDRESS THE CORNER AND THERE'S THAT WE NOT APPROVE

THIS. >> COUNCIL PERSON ALLEN, YOU

ARE RECOGNIZED. >> WHAT WOULD LIKE TO SAY ABOUT THIS PROPERTY IS THE PROPERTIES THAT MY FELLOW COUNCIL PERSON WERE TALKING ABOUT ARE PROPERTIES THAT ARE ALREADY APPROVED THAT ALREADY BEEN ZONED THAT ARE ALREADY IN THE MIDDLE OF BUILDING. WE CAN'T FIX THAT NOW.

IT'S BEEN APPROVED. THESE HOUSES THAT HE LOOKS TO BUILD ARE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. IT'S 46 UNITS.

WE CAN HAVE 46 UNITS GO IN. DON'T ASK MY FELLOW COUNCILMEMBERS TO GET THIS APPROVED.

IT'S ONE OR THE OTHER. AT THIS POINT, WE HAVE TO -- WE CAN SAY LET'S FIX THIS INTERSECTION.

IT'S A HORRIBLE INTERSECTION. WE KNOW THAT.

WE ALL KNOW THAT. WE DRIVEN IT AND EVERYTHING LIKE THAT. AT SOME POINT WE NEED TO SAY LET'S FIX THIS INTERSECTION. BUS STOPPING SOMETHING FROM BEING REZONED WHEN IT WON'T BE DONE FOR SEVERAL YEARS WILL NOT FIX THIS INTERSECTION SOONER.

WE HAVE TO DECIDE COUNCIL IN NEEDS TO GET DONE.

THIS IS NOT SOMETHING THAT GOES TO THE ZONING THAT WE CAN SAY, WELL, WE OUT IN SIDEWALK IT WILL BE BETTER.

WE HAVE TO DO THAT AT COUNCIL.

THAT'S NOT ZONING. I WOULD SAY WE GO AHEAD AND GET THIS APPROVED TODAY AND THEN WE HAVE COME BACK AND LOOK AT THIS CORNER AND REALLY GET IT FIXED.

>> THANK YOU. >> COUNCIL PERSON BUTLER, YOU

ARE RECOGNIZED. >> I'M PRETTY SURE THAT MY COLLEAGUE COULD GO AHEAD AND SPEAK FOR ME TOO.

A LOT OF WHAT I WANTED TO SAY WHEN I CLICKED MY BUTTON IDENTICAL TO WHAT WAS JUST SAID.

ABOUT WE HAVE TO LOOK AT THE FACT WE TALK ABOUT OUR FAVORITE WORD UP HERE EQUITABLE.

WE'RE NOT DICTATING WHAT A PROPERTY OWNER CAN DO WITH THEIR PROPERTY. BUT THE CASE WE SEE WITH THIS IN PARTICULAR AFTER APPROVING ALL THE OTHER ONE BUT SAYING NO TO THIS ONE. WE'RE ALSO PICKING AND CHOOSING WHO GETS TO BUILD. AND I PERSONALLY DON'T WHAT THAT LABEL ALONG WITH SOME OF THE OTHER ONES THAT WE HAVE UP HERE. THE OTHER THING THAT I AGREED WITH THAT, THAT THREE-WAY STOP WITH THE RANDOM GREEN SPACE IN THE MIDDLE OF ROAD, CAN WE GET AN E-MAIL.

WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT THAT? >> IT'S WILD UP THERE.

EVERYTHING THAT MY COLLEAGUE AS MUCH AS I APPRECIATE HER RESEARCH AND HER TENACITY AND PASSION ABOUT THIS AND HER COMMUNITY. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OTHER APARTMENT THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN APPROVED AND WE CANNOT HOLD THE REQUEST OF THIS ZONING RESPONSIBLE TO THAT.

I FEEL LIKE THAT'S WHAT WE ARE DOING UP HERE.

>> COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND. YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> I WAS GOING AGREE WITH THE PREVIOUS SPEAKERS.

I THINK WE SHOULD VOTE THIS THROUGH.

WE HAVE THE COLLEGE THERE THAT WILL BE NEEDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING. IT'S FLOURISHING AREA.

IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE TO ADDRESS AND I DON'T KNOW IF I MISHEARD. THIS COULDN'T BE PUT IN BECAUSE IT DIDN'T EXIST. I TOO WILL BE IN FAVOR OF ASK MY OTHER COUNCILMEMBERS VOTE THIS THROUGH FOR THE 46 UNITS

TO THE DEVELOPER. >> THANK YOU.

COUNCIL PERSON REYNOLDS, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO SAY INSTEAD OF THINKING OF SAFETY AND WELL-BEING AFTERWARD. WE SHOULD START CONSIDERING WALKABILITY AND SAFETY AND DRIVABILITY OF COMMUNITIES BEFORE WE BUILD AND AS WE BUILD.

NOT AS AN AFTER THOUGHT. WE SHOULD DO IT AS WE GO ALONG. WE SHOULD SEND THE MESSAGE THAT'S WHAT WE EXPECT WHEN ZONING COMES BEFORE US.

[01:25:01]

YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >> I WILL VOTE FOR.

CLARKSVILLE IS GROWING INSANELY FAST.

RENT RATES GO UP WITH THAT. WE NEED AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

THIS WILL BE SOMETHING THAT'S NEED.

IT'S UNFORTUNATE ABOUT THE TRAFFIC.

WE HAVE TO BE PROACTIVE. I WILL VOTE FOR IT, THANK

YOU. >> COUNCIL PERSON ALLEN,

YOU'RE RECOGNIZED. >> ONE LAST STATEMENT.

MAYBE A QUESTION FOR YOU. THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN AS PRESENTED WE'VE BEEN TOLD IT'S A FLUID DOCUMENT.

IF WES THIS AREA HAS CHANGED IN TIER 2 WE COULD LOOK AT

DOING SOMETHING DIRECT. >> IT'S FLUID.

IT'S FLUID. WE PLAN TO LOOK AT IT AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR AS CONDITIONS CHANGE.

>> ANY OTHER MEMBER OF COUNCIL WHICH TO BE RECOGNIZED ON ORDINANCE 6. ARE YOU READY TO VOTE? ALL MEMBERS CAST YOUR VOTE. CAST YOUR VOTE, PLEASE.

EVERY MEMBER VOTE. ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE

THEIR VOTE? >> 7 YES, 3 NOS.

ZERO ABSTAINED. ORDINANCE 6 IS ADOPTED FIRST READING. COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. THANK YOU, MAYOR.

ORDINANCE 72021-22. BOTH THE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE STAFF RECOMMENDED APPROVAL AND I SO

MOVE. >> MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED IN GAVE R OF ORDINANCE 7.

ANY MEMBER OF COUNCIL FROM A QUESTION OR COMMENT REGARDING

ORDINANCE 7? >> I BELIEVE IN THE PREVIOUS

VOTE ONE PRESENT MEMBERS -- >> I DIDN'T GET CAPTURED.

HIS VOTE. >> MADAM CLERK.

CAN YOU -- IT WAS 9. >> WE'LL BE MINDFUL OF THAT

GOING FORWARD. >> THANK YOU, MA'AM.

>> THANK YOU. COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN DO

YOU WISH TO BE RECOGNIZED. >> YES, MAYOR.

THIS ACTUALLY LOCATED IN MY WARD.

AND I HAVE NOT HEARD ANY FEEDBACK FROM THE COMMUNITY THAT WAS AGAINST THIS. I DO KNOW THERE ARE OTHER APARTMENTS IN THE AREA. I DID JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THAT WITH THAT BEING PART OF WARD 10 THAT ALSO AS WAS REFERENCED THERE WAS NO COMPLAINTS FOR THE AT THE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.

I HAVE RECEIVED NONE AS WELL. >> THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER MEMBER OF COUNCIL HAVE A QUESTION OR COMMENT

REGARDING ORDINANCE 7? >> SEEING NONE HEARING NONE ARE YOU READY TO VOTE? ALL MEMBERS, CAST YOUR VOTE.

>> EVERY MEMBER VOTED. COUNCIL PERSON REDD, YOU ARE

REGISTERED. >> MADAM CLERK, TAKE THE

VOTE. >> 11 YES.

ZERO NO. >> ORDINANCE 7 ADOPTED.

FIRST READING COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN, YOU ARE

RECOGNIZED. >> THANK YOU, MAYOR.

ORDINANCE 82021-22. FIRST READING.

BOTH THE STAFF AND COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND I SO MOVE. MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND PROPERLY SECONDED IN FAVOR OF ORDINANCE 8.

ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENT FROM COUNCIL REGARDING ORDINANCE

8? >> COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN,

YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >> THANK YOU MAYOR.

ANOTHER ONE ALSO WITHIN WARD 10 AND I HAVE NOT HEARD ANY COMPLAINTS. IN REGARD TO THESE BEING BUILT. THANK YOU.

>> ANY OTHER MEMBER OF COUNCIL HAVE A QUESTION OR COMMENT REGARDING ORDINANCE 8?

>> ARE YOU READY TO VOTE? >> ALL MEMBERS CAST YOUR VOTE. ANYONE WISH TO CHANGE THEIR VOTE? MADAM CLERK.

TAKE THE VOTE. >> 11 YES.

ZERO NO. ORDINANCE 8 ADOPTED FIRST READING. ORDINANCE 9-2021.

22 FIRST READING. BOTH THE REGION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDED

[01:30:02]

APPROVAL AND I SO MOVE. >> SECOND.

>> MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND PROPERLY SECONDED IN FAVOR ORDINANCE 9 IN MEMBER OF COUNSEL HAVE A QUESTION OR COMMENT? COUNCIL PERSON REYNOLDS YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. I WANTED ADDRESS THE CITIZENS CONCERN THAT A HAS THE PROPERTY NEXT TO REZONING.

THEY HAD SUBMITTED DEEDS. AND THERE WAS A CONCERN BECAUSE IF YOU'VE DRIVEN THAT AREA, HER WATER LINE IS METER ARE ON OLD PETERSON LANE AND SHE LIVES OFF OF WHIT FIELD.

I SPOKE TO HER. AND SHE ACTUALLY SPOKE TO GAS AND WATER. WE ARE ADDRESSING THEY'RE CONCERN AS AND HE ASSURED HER HE WOULD WORK WITH HER.

AS WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS. I JUST WANTED TO ADD THAT AS WELL. ANY OTHER MEMBER OF COUNCIL HAVE A QUESTION REGARDING ORDINANCE 9.

ARE YOU READY TO VOTE? >> EVERY MEMBER CAST YOUR VOTE. EVERY MEMBER VOTED.

ANYONE WISH TO CHANGE THEIR VOTE.

MADAM CLERK, TAKE THE VOTE. >> 8 YES, 3, NO, ZERO

ABSTAIN. >> ORDINANCE 9AIRE ADOPTED FIRST READING. COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. ORDINANCE 10-2021-22.

FIRST READING BOTH THE STAFF AND THE COMMISSION VOTED RECOMMENDED APPROVAL AND I SO MOVE.

>> MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND PROPERLY SECONDED FOR ORDINANCE 10. ANY MEMBER OF COUNCIL HAVE A

QUESTION OR COMMENT? >> SEEING NONE.

ARE YOU READY TO VOTE? ALL MEMBERS CAST YOUR VOTE.

EVERY MEMBER VOTED. ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE

THEIR VOTE? >> MADAM CLERK, TAKE THE

VOTE. >> 11 YES, ZERO NOS.

ZERO ABSTAINED. ORDINANCE 10 ADOPTED FIRST READING. COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN.

YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. 82 THANK YOU.

ORDINANCE 11. 2021-22 FIRST READING.

BOTH THE STAFF AND THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDED

APPROVAL AND I SO MOVE. >> MOTION MADE AND PROPERLY SECONDED IN FAVOR OF ORDINANCE 11.

MY MEMBER OF COUNCIL HAVE A QUESTION R O COMMENT?

>> ARE YOU READY TO VOTE. ALL MEMBERS CAST YOUR VOTE.

EVERY MEMBER VOTED. ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE THEIR VOTE? MADAM CLERK.

TAKE THE VOTE. >> 11 YES.

ZERO NOS. ZERO ABSTAIN.

>> ORDINANCE 11 ADOPT FIRST READING.

COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

ORDINANCE 12, 2021-22. BOTH THE STAFF AND COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL. I MOVE.

>> THE MOTION MADE AND SECONDED IN FAVOR OF ORDINANCE 12. WE HAVE QUESTIONS, COMMENTS

FROM COUNCIL PERSON ALLEN. >> I WOULD ASK THE COUNCIL TO POSTPONE THIS UNTIL AFTER WE GET THE COUNCIL PERSON FROM WARD 5 IN. THE REASON I SAY AT THIS POINT RIGHT NOW THEY DON'T HAVE THAT REPRESENTATION THAT WE HAVE FOR OUR WARDS. WE JUST HEARD OUR COUNCIL PERSON GO HEAD STRONG INTO HER WARD BECAUSE SHE KNEW WHAT HER CONSTITUENTS WANTED. WE DON'T HAVE ANYONE TO DO.

I ASK WE POSTPONE THIS TODAY. >> THANK YOU.

>> IS THAT A MOTION? >> MOTION TO POSTPONE.

>> POSTPONE UNTIL -- >> UNTIL OCTOBER.

>> UNTIL OCTOBER REGULAR SESSION.

>> THE MOTION HAS BEEN MADE TO POSTPONE ORDINANCE 12 TO OCTOBER REGULAR SESSION. I THINK I HEARD A SECOND.

>> OKAY. THANK YOU.

PROPERLY SECONDED. NOW WE HAVE FOLKS ON THE LIST COUNCIL PERSON LITTLE, DID YOU WISH TO ADDRESS

POSTPONEMENT? >> NO, MAYOR.

>> COUNCIL PERSON BUTLER DO YOU WISH TO ADDRESS

POSTPONEMENT? >> YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

I WASN'T BUT NOW I WILL. SHE BE STEALING MY THUNDER.

I SUPPORT THIS FOR THE EXACT SAME REASON.

THEY DON'T HAVE A VOICE. OBVIOUSLY WE HAVE -- YOU ARE STRONG VOICES. DON'T GET ME CONFUSED.

THEY NEED THEIR REPRESENTATION.

I'M FEEL THING WAY ABOUT LIKE I DON'T WANT TO SAY WHAT I WILL FUTURISTICALLY. I DON'T THINK IT'S BAD IDEA FOR ANY ZONING CASES. I APOLOGIZE MR. TINDELL AND TO OWNER AND BUILDERS. YOU KNOW HOW I FEEL ABOUT ZONING. WHAT IT COMES DOWN WE HAVE TO HAVE THE REPRESENTATION HERE. I SUPPORT THIS.

PLEASE VOTE TO POSTPONE AND THANK YOU.

>> ANY OTHER MEMBER OF COUNCIL HAVE A QUESTION OR COMMENT REGARDING THE MOTION TO POSTPONE UNTIL OCTOBER

REGULAR SESSION? >> SEEING NONE -- COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND. YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

IS THIS FOR MOTION TO POSTPONE?

>> YES, SIR. >> IF WE -- JUST TRYING TO GET CLARITY. THIS IS FIRST READING.

[01:35:06]

AND WE DO THE ACCEPTING OF THE NEW TWO VACANT MEMBERS.

>> SEPTEMBER 7TH SPECIAL SESSION TO VOTE THE REPLACE

NEW MEMBERS. >> SEPTEMBER 7TH;

>> IF WE POSTPONE? >> IF WE POSTPONE TO OCTOBER.

>> IF WE DON'T POSTPONE SECOND READING NEXT MONTH.

>> IT WOULD BE SEPTEMBER 2ND IF IT PASSES.

>> GOT YOU. TAKE NO RISK THERE.

OKAY. THANK YOU, MA'AM.

>> THANK YOU. MR. BAKER.

I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE IF THE CITY COUNCIL TAKES NO FINAL ACTION, WITHIN 100 DAYS, FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE FAILURE TO ACT SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE A DENIAL. I THINK YOU GOT TO ACCOUNT FINAL ACTION WOULD BE SECOND READING.

HAS GOT TO BE WITHIN 100 DAYS.

>> OKAY. THANK YOU.

>> ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMENT REGARDING THE MOTION TO POSTPONE COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND, YOU HAD ANOTHER QUESTION.

POINT OF CLARITY. COULD YOU WALK US THROUGH.

I DIDN'T COUNT THE DAYS WITH THAT FOR TO US BE INFRACTION.

OR WE WOULD FALL WITHIN? >> MR. BAKER?

>> YES. I DON'T HAVE A CALENDAR HANDCY. WE NEED TO COUNT UP 100 DAYS FROM NOW TODAY. AND YOU'VE GOT -- YOU GOT TO ACT ON IT FINAL ACTION. FINAL ACTION WOULD BE A SECOND READING VOTE. AND IF YOU DON'T HAVE THE SECOND READING VOTE WITHIN 100 DAYS OF TODAY.

WHATEVER DAY THAT IS. THEN IT WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY BY LAW OPERATIONAL LAW BE DEEMED TO BE A DENIAL.

TODAY THE AUGUST 5TH. >> DOES ANYONE HAVE A

CALENDAR? >>

>> INFORMED BY AUDIENCE. NOVEMBER 13TH.

>> IF YOU HAVE FIRST READING IN OCTOBER.

THAT WOULD PUT US WITHIN THE REGULAR SESSION OF NOVEMBER.

>> THANK YOU FOR THAT POINT. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENT REGARDING THE MOTION TO POSTPONE THIS ORDINANCE UNTIL THE OCTOBER REGULAR SESSION?

>> SEEING NONE ARE YOU READY TO VOTE ON THE MOTION TO POSTPONE? EVERY MEMBER CAST YOUR VOTE.

EVERY MEMBER VOTES. ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE

THEIR VOTE? >> MADAM CLERK, TAKE THE

VOTE. >> 11 YES.

ZERO NO. ZERO ABSTAIN.

>> MOTION TO POSTPONE ORDINANCE 12 IS ADOPTED.

COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT, MAYOR.

WE'RE NOW READY FOR THE CONSENT AGENDA.

[7) CONSENT AGENDA]

>> ALL ITEMS IN THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE AND NONCONTROVERSIAL BY THE COUNCIL AND MAY BE APPROVED BY ONE MOTION.

HOWEVER A MEMBER OF THE COUNSEL MAY REQUEST AN ITEM BE REMOVED FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION UNDER THE APPROPRIATE COMMITTEE REPORT. 1-2021-22 SECOND READING AMENDMENTING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE APPLICATION ROOF REDA FOR ZONE CHANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF EVANS ROAD AND SHAW DRIVE FROM RM-1 SINGLE-FAMILY MOBILE HOME RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO R-4 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. ORDINANCE 2-2021-22.

SECOND READING. APPLICATION OF CITY OF CLARKSVILLE. JOE PITTS MAYOR AGENT FOR ZONE CHANGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OFFION STREET AND SOUTH THIRD STREET FROM CBD CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO TO R-4 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. RESOLUTION 7-2021-22.

APPROVING A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR SALE OF WINE AND SILVER DOLLAR INCORPORATED AT 2700 TRENTON

ROAD. >> RESOLUTION 9-2021-22 APPROVING APPOINTMENT TO ARTS AND HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ADULT ORIENTED ESTABLISHMENT BOARD AND TREE

BOARD. >> ADOPTION OF MINUTES JUNE 28, JUNE 29, JUNE 30 AND JULY 1.

>> THANK YOU, MADAM CLERK. I NEED A MOTION AND SECOND.

>> MOTION BEEN MADE AND PROPERLY SECONDED IN FAVOR OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. ARE YOU READY TO VOTE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? EVERY MEMBER CAST YOUR VOTE.

[01:40:04]

MADAM CLERK PLEASE TAKE THE VOTE.

11 YES, ZERO NO. CONSENT AGENDA IS ADOPTED.

[8) FINANCE COMMITTEE]

CHAIRPERSON STREETMAN YOU'RE RECOGNIZED FOR THE FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT. IF POSSIBLE WITHOUT OBJECTION, WE HAVE QUITE A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT HERE TONIGHT FOR COUPLE ITEM FURTHER DOWN THE LIST.

I'M SURE THEY THOROUGHLY ENJOYING SPENDING THE EVENING. WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE THAT WE COULD MOVE UP ITEM NO. FIVE AND ITEM 6 TO THE FRONT OF

THE FINANCE COMMITTEE AGENDA. >> WITHOUT OBJECTION THE COMMITTEE CHAIR ASK I HEAR NONE.

WE WILL MOVE ITEM FIVE WHICH IS RESOLUTION FIVE AND ITEM 6 RESOLUTION 6 TO THE FRONT OF THE AGENDA.

CHAIRPERSON STREETMAN, YOU'RE RECOGNIZED.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. RESOLUTION FIVE 2021-22.

AUTHORIZING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH MOUNT OLIVE CEMETERY HISTORICAL PRESERVATION SOCIETY AND ACCEPTING DONATION OF THE UNITED STATES COLORED TROOPS MONUMENT PARKS AND RECREATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEES BOTH VOTED FOR APPROVAL. AND I SO MOVED.

>> MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND PROPERLY SECONDED IN FAVOR OF RESOLUTION FIVE. COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED FOR A QUESTION.

>> NO I JUST WANT TO MAKE A COMMENT.

>> MAKE A COMMENT. >> YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> THANK YOU. I JUST WANTED TO STAKE THIS TIME TO THANK MOUNT OLIVE ORGANIZATION THAT PUT THIS TOGETHER. I HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SIT ON THE PARKS AND REC WHEN HE HEARD THIS.

I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR TAKE THING PROJECT ON. I AM A MEMBER OF THE CUSTOMS A HOUSE BOARD. AND IT IS A VERY EXCITING PROJECT. I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO GET THIS BEFORE US AND SO I WANT TO THANK YOU AND SAY THIS IS A WIN WIN FOR OUR CITY AND I LOOK FORWARD TO THE RIBBON CUTTING OR WHATEVER TYPE OF CEREMONY WE WILL KICK OFF TO CELEBRATE THE ERECTION OR THE COMPLETION OF THIS MOMENTOUS OCCASION.

THANK YOU. COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD?

>> I ALSO SUPPORT THIS. I THINK IT'S A GREAT PROJECT.

THIS IS A -- US ACCEPTING THIS.

I WOULD ASK WE VOTE IN FAVOR OF THIS.

>> THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER MEMBER OF COUNCIL HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT RESOLUTION FIVE.

HEARING NONE, COUNCIL PERSON REDD, CAN YOU WISH TO BE RECOGNIZED. AS SPONSOR OF MOUNT OLIVE PRE PRESERVATION SET, I WOULD ASK YOU TO VOTE FOR IT. AND IF YOU GET A CHANCE MAKE

A DONATION. >> ANY OTHER MEMBER OF COUNCIL HAVE A QUESTION OR COMMENT? PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. EVERY MEMBER VOTED.

ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE THE VOTE?

>> MADAM CLERK, TAKE THE VOTE.

>> 11 YES. ZERO NOS.

ZERO ABTRAINED. RESOLUTION FIVE IS ADOPTED.

CHAIRMAN STREETMAN YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

RESOLUTION 6-2021-22 AUTHORIZING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH COMBAT VETERAN MOTORCYCLE ASSOCIATION PERTAINING TO MEMORIAL WALL AT PATRIOT'S PARK. THEY BOTHED VOTED IN APPROVAL. I SO EL IS MOVE.

>> MOTION MADE AND SECONDED IN FAVOR OF THE RESOLUTION 6.

COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN -- REYNOLDS EXCUSE ME. YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> I WOULD JUST LIKE TO THANK YOU TO THE COMBAT VETERANS MOTORCYCLE -- I'M SORRY ASSOCIATION EXCUSE ME.

FOR THIS. I'M A VETERAN.

AND MOTHER OF ACTIVE DUTY NAVY SEAMAN.

I'M GRATEFUL FOR THIS. THANK YOU.

>> COUNCIL PERSON BUTLER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. IT NEVER CEASES TO AMAZE WE HAVE COME TO POINT THAT OUR GOING ON WALLS THAT WE ALL USED TO LOOK AT AS KIDS FOR VIETNAM AND KOREA, AND I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW THIS MEANS A LOT TO ME.

AND ALL OF YOU MEAN A LOT TO ME.

ALSO I'M SORRY I CRY. BECAUSE IT'S EMBARRASSING.

THANK YOU. >> COUNCIL PERSON ALLEN, YOU

ARE RECOGNIZED. >> I ALSO LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU AS A VETERAN AS FELLOW WRITER I THINK THIS AN MAY IING THING YOU ARE DOING. DROVE WITH YOU GUYS BEFORE.

A LOT OF THE WOMEN. AND I JUST LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THIS. I AM DISABLED VETERAN.

[01:45:01]

THANK YOU. I HAVEN'T GOT A CALL YET.

YOU GOT ME. >> OKAY.

>> >> ANYBODY ELSE WISH TO BE

RECOGNIZED ON RESOLUTION 6? >> COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND.

YOU ARE UP. >> THANK YOU.

I JUST WANTED TO TAKE A MOMENT TO SAY THANK YOU AND FELLOW FORM COUNCILMEMBER THANK YOU FOR YOUR WORK.

MY STEP FATHER VETERAN AND MY FATHER ARE VETERANS.

THEY ARE STILL WITH US. THANKS FOR THIS PROJECT FOR SUCH A TIME AS THIS FOR OUR COMMUNITY.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT HERE TONIGHT AND GOD BLESS

YOU. >> ANYONE ELSE WISH TO BE RECOGNIZED ON RESOLUTION 6? COUNCIL PERSON REDD, YOU ARE

RECOGNIZED. >> I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE. AND GOD BLESS YOU.

>> ANYONE ELSE WISH TO BE RECOGNIZED ON RESOLUTION 6?

>> SEEING NONE HEARING NONE ARE YOU READY TO VOTE.

ALL MEMBERS CAST YOUR VOTE. >> EVERY MEMBER VOTED.

I DON'T LIVE IN YOUR WARD, SORRY.

[LAUGHTER] >> WE'LL HOLD THE BOARD OPEN [INAUDIBLE]

>> OKAY. EVERY MEMBER VOTED.

MY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE THE VOTE.

MADAM CLERK, TAKE THE VOTE. >> 11 YES, ZERO NO, ZERO

ABSTAINED. >> RESOLUTION 6 ADOPTED.

UNANIMOUSLY. [APPLAUSE]

THANK YOU. >> YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> IT'S TIME FOR A BREAK. >> HANG ON A MINUTE.

IS THAT BECAUSE YOU HAD FOOD AND THE REST OF US DIDN'T.

NOT TO POINT OUT. >> PROVE IT.

PROVE IT. WE WILL TAKE AN 8-MINUTE RECESS UNTIL FIVE MINUTES UNTIL 8:00.

IT'S >> LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, IF I COULD ASK YOU TO TAKE YOUR SEATS, WE WILL RESUME.

WE ARE NOW BACK ON THE FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT, CHAIR PENN STREETMAN, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

ITEM NO. ONE ORDINANCE 109-2020-21.

FIRST READING AMENDMENTING THE OFFICIAL CODE RELATIVE TO SHORT TERM RENTALS INDIVIDUAL OWNER FINANCE COMMITTEE

RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. >>

>> IS THAT A MOTION? >> MOTION.

AND PROPERLY SECONDED FOR APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 10 #.

COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> THANK YOU MAYOR. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THAT WE VOTE AGAINST THIS AMENDMENT TO THE SHORT-TERM RENTAL ORDINANCE. I'VE TOOK THE TIME THIS PAST WEEK SEEING HOW THIS DID ONLY VERY BRIEFLY GO TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE AND AS I MENTIONED LAST WEEK IT WAS DISCUSSED THAT ITS GOING TO COME TO US TO SEND BACK TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. AND AT THE TIME I WAS PLANNING TO RECOMMEND IT GO BACK TO PUBLIC SAFETY KAEL AS THAT IS ONE OF THE COMMITTEES THAT DID GO THROUGH.

AND OUR PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENTS WERE VERY INVOLVED IN CREATING THIS TO INCLUDE BUILDING IN CODES AS WELL. THIS PAST WEEK I MET WITH THE CHIEF OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT THE CHIEF OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, THE DIRECTOR OF BUILDING AND CODES AS WELL AS THE FINANCE DIRECTOR. AND JUST KIND OF WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE FACT THAT WE DO HAVE SAFETY INSPECTION THAT ARE DONE BY BOTH THE BUILDING AND CODES DEPARTMENT AND THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF OUR GUEST AS WELL AS TO HELP CREATE PROTECTION FOR OUR CITIZENS. I WANT SAY A FEW THINGS I DID RECEIVE. AND THIS WOULD BE FROM MR. FREDDY MONTGOMERY. IN REGARDS TO AMENDMENTS TO SHORT-TERM RENTAL ORDINANCE. MYSELF AND INSPECTOR MOORE.

>> YOU ARE RECOGNIZED FOR POINT OF ORDER.

[INAUDIBLE] HE IS NEXT ON THE LIST.

THIS IS COMING FROM THE FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT.

>> OKAY. >> GO AHEAD COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN. AND THEN I WILL COME TO

COUNCIL PERSON REDD. >> THANK YOU, MAYOR.

>> IN REGARD TO SHORT-TERM RENTAL ORDINANCE MYSELF BEING CHIEF MONTGOMERY AND CHIEF INSPECTOR MOORE HAVE

[01:50:01]

AS YOU MAY KNOW, ON A NATIONAL LEVEL, THE SHORT-TERM RENTAL MODEL IS IMPACTING LOW-INCOME HOUSING AVAILABILITY AS WELL AS HOTELS.

IN MY VIEW THIS THE PUSHING THE REGULATED OCCUPANCY OF HOTELS OUT INTO OUR COMMUNITY.

POSSIBLY RESULTING IN MULTIPLE UNREGULATED STRUCTURE AND DIMINISHED SAFETY FOR OUR VISITORS AND SHORT-TERM RENTAL USER. CLARKSVILLE FIRE AND RESCUE WE SEE GREAT BENEFIT IN BOTH TRACKING AND ENSURING SAFETY IN THE OCCUPANTSIES. MY POSITION IS MERELY THAT OF SAFETY. AND CARVING OUT REGULATION IN ORDINANCE FOR ONE TYPE OR MODEL IT MAY CREATE LOOPHOLE LEADING TO MORE UNREGULATED AND UNSAFE OCCUPANCY.

I WOULD SUGGEST THAT WE CONTINUE CONDUCTING THE INSPECTION AND ISSUE THE PERMIT FOR THOSE MEETING REQUIREMENT OF THIS AMENDMENT.

ALSO WE HAVE NOTED THAT THE MAJORITY OF OUR FIRES ARE RESIDENTIAL AND NEARLY ALL FIRE DEATH OCCUR IN HOMES WITH NO WORKING DETECTOR. THE SINGLE BIGGEST FIRE SAFETY PUSH IN THE STATE IS TO ISSUE FREE SMOKE DETECTORS IN HOME. SHORT-TERM RENTAL ORDINANCE GIVES AN OPPORTUNITY TO EXTEND THIS EFFORT INTO STRUCTURES WITH OCCUPANTS THAT CONTINUALLY CHANGE WHO MAY NOT BE AWARE OF ABSENT SAFETY STANDARDS.

ALSO WANT TO MOVE ON WHAT I RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTOR BUILDING AND CODES. SAFETY IS ASSUMPTION THAT ALL TRAVELLER MAKE INCLUDING ALL OF US.

WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME YOU TESTED THE SMOKE DETECTOR IN HOTEL YOU WERE STAYING AT OR CHECKED THE TAG ON A FIRE EXTINGUISHER. YOU TAKE THE ELEVATOR WITHOUT QUESTIONING THE INSPECTION HISTORY OR SERVICE SCHEDULE.

YOU WILL SEND THE KIDS TO POOL OR SOAK HOT TUB ASSUMING EVERYTHING HAS BEEN DONE TO ENSURE SAFETY.

THE SAFETY MEASURE REQUIRED IN THE HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY AND THEY ARE SUBJECT TO REGULAR INSPECTION BY STATE AND LOCAL PERSONAL. WHAT MAKES A SHORT-TERM RENTAL DIFFERENT? IF SOMEONE RENTS OUT SINGLE ROOM DOES THAT MEAN THE SHORT-TERM RENTAL OCCUPANT WON'T UTILIZE OTHER PART OF THE HOUSE.

KITCHEN. DOES IT STAND TO REASON THE SAFETY OF THE REST OF THE HOME HAVE NEGATIVE IMPACT TO LIFE SAFETY AND THE SINGLE ROOM THEY OCCUPY? IF THEY RENT ONLY A PARLIAMENT OF THE YEAR DOES IT MEAN PERMISSIBLE TO COMPROMISE SAFETY.

COULD THEY DODGE ELEVATOR OR FIRE SURGICAL SUPPRESSION.

IF SOMEONE HAS ONE SHORT-TERM RENTAL WHY PERMITTED TO LEASE SUBSTANDARD FACILITY. IS IT OKAY THE DECK UNSAFE OR THERE'S NO SMOKE OR CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS.

ONE OWNER, WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR DOZEN OR HUNDREDS OF VISITOR PER YEAR COMING INTO THE COMMUNITY WITH THE ASUM SCHENN AS WE LAWMAKERS HAVE TAKEN STEPS TO ENSURE THEIR SAFETY IS PARAMOUNT. WE SHOULD NOT MAKE

CONCESSIONS ON SAFETY EVER. >> I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT AGAIN ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE DISCUSSED.

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THREE DIFFERENT THINGS HERE.

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IF THEY ONLY HAVE -- IF ONLY RUNNING OUT OF ROOM IN THEIR HOME. WHICH ROOM WILL IT BE? WILL IT BE THE GARAGE? BECAUSE WOULDN'T THAT POTENTIALLY ALLOW IF WE SAY ONLY RENTING OUT ONE ROOM.

COULDN'T THEY SHOVE BEDS INTO THE GARAGE.

EVEN IF IT'S BEDROOM. THEY COULD SHOVE ROOMS IN THERE. WHAT IF SOME OF THE DOORS ARE LOCKED THEY NEED TO BE ABLE TO GET OUT.

AS WAS ADDRESSED. THEY WILL BE IN OTHER AREAS OF THE HOME. DON'T WE WANT TO ENSURE THEY ARE SAFE. WE'RE DOING THIS WHEN IT COMES TO HOTEL. WHY WOULD WE NOT DO THIS EVEN WHEN IT COMES TO RUN ROOM. IF WE INSPECT OTHER SHORT-TERM RENTALS WHY WOULD WE NOT WANT TO INSPECT THE ONE WHERE JUST ONE ROOM. IT ALSO STATES THAT IF THEY ARE ONLY RENTING OUT FOR SIX MONTHS OUT OF THE CALENDAR YEAR. OR JUST SAYS SIX MONTHS OUT OF CALENDAR YEAR. SOME OF THE EL QUESTIONS I BROUGHT UP. SO THAT IT COULD BE WORKED ON. WAS THAT WHAT DOES IT MEAN BY SIX MONTHS. DOES THAT MEAN LISTED FOR SIX MONTHS. IS IT IF THEY ONLY PUT ON FOR WEEKEND. DOES IT COUNT JUST AS BEING LISTED OR COUNT AS ACTUALLY BEING RENTED OUT.

IF THEY RENT IT OUT FOR WEEKEND THEN WOULDN'T THAT COULDN'T THAT POSSIBLY BE A LOT OF OURS.

THEN AGAIN IT GOES BACK IS IT WE'RE ONLY CONCERNED IF IT'S SAFE FOR PART OF THE YEAR AND NOT ALL OF THE YEAR? AND THEN ALSO GOING TO THE FACT OF ONLY ONE OWNER.

WHAT DISTINGUISHES IT ONLY ONE BEING ONE OWNER.

IF THEY ARE AGAIN HUSBAND OWNING ONE.

THE SPOUSE OWNING THE OTHER. LLC'S OWNING THE OTHER.

[01:55:06]

FOR US TO KNOW WHAT IT IS GOING TO BE IF THIS ONE THAT'S ELIGIBLE TO BE PERMITTED.

IF IT'S NOT ELIGIBLE AND HAS TO BE PERMITTED.

I THINK IT CREATES CONFUSION. AND I THINK IT'S ALSO GOING TO BE UNFAIR TO THOSE THAT HAVE YOU KNOW MULTIPLE.

NOW THERE BEING FACED WITH DIFFERENT REGULATION AND FEES THAN THOSE THAT ONLY ONLY ONE OR HAVE IN A ROOM.

ALSO SORRY. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO TALK ABOUT THE FACT THAT WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT THIS WAY.

AND AGAIN WE TALKED WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO BELIEVES WE SHOULD LEAVE THINGS AS THEY ARE.

AND ENFORCE THIS ON ALL. THEY BELIEVE THE BUILDING CODE ALSO BELIEVES THAT. YOU KNOW AS WE WERE SITTING AROUND TALK. ONE EXAMPLE ABOUT YOU'VE GOT A SOLDIER THAT'S MAYBE HAVING A CEREMONY AT FT. CAMPBELL.

HIS FAMILY COMES HOME TO VISIT HIM.

YOU KNOW, MOM, DAD. THEY ARE EXCITED TO SEE THIS CEREMONY. THEY HANG OUT ON THE BACK DECK WITH BARBECUE. DAD LEANS AGAINST THE DECK.

>> HE FALLS DOWN. NOW INSTEAD OF GETTING TO GO TO CEREMONY. THEY SPEND TIME IN THE HOSPITAL. OR THINK ABOUT ■ITTHISAY.

ANOTHER SPECIAL OCCASION THAT MAY OCCUR IN SOLDIER.

THEY HAVE A NEW GRANDBABY COMING.

ALL EXCITED. THEY ARE COMING HERE.

GETTING TO SEE THE GRANDBABY. USING THE SAME EXAMPLE.

LAYING ON THE DEGREE. THEY FALL THROUGH.

OR THE STAIRS AREN'T IN GOOD CONDITION.

THEY END UP FALLING THROUGH DOWN THE STAIRS.

NOW INSTEAD OF BEING IN THE HOSPITAL TO CELEBRATE THIS JOYOUS OCCASION OF THE GRANDCHILD BEING BORN.

THEY ARE SPENDING THEIR TIME IN THE HOSPITAL.

I WANT US TO THINK ABOUT THE SAFETY OF THOSE THAT WE'RE BRINGING HERE AND LOOK BACK TO WHAT I SAID IN REGARD TO THE HOTELS BEING CHECKED. THERE ARE THAT YOU DON'T THINK ABOUT WHEN YOU GO IN THERE.

YOU KNOW THEY ARE CHECKED ON A REGULAR BASIS.

WHY DON'T WE WANT THAT FOR OUR FAMILY AND FRIEND TO BE ABLE TO STAY. I KNOW THE EXAMPLE WAS MADE IF REFERENCE TO YOU KNOW WHAT IF WE HAVE THIS ONCE IN A LIFETIME EVENT AGAIN LIKE WE HAD WITH THE ECLIPSE.

WE ACTUALLY MADE GREAT BIG NEWS FOR HAVING THAT EVENT.

I AM NOT OPPOSED TO US HAVING SHORT-TERM RENTALS.

I THINK ARE BENEFIT TO COMMUNITY.

THEY NEED TO BE REGULATED AND OPERATED PROPERLY FOR THE SAFETY OF THOSE GUEST BUT ALSO IN THE EVENT THAT THEY ARE NUISANCE AND PROBLEM IN THE COMMUNITY.

OUR RESIDENTS NEED A PATH TO GET THOSE ISSUE RESOLVED WHEN THERE'S A NUISANCE OR PROBLEM.

WHEN WE TALK ABOUT ONLY OWNING ONE PROPERTY, I GET E-MAILS ALL THE TIME. WHEN I FIRST STARTED DOING THE RESEARCH. I SIGNED UP FOR A LOT OF SHORT-TERM RENTAL WHERE I WOULD GET INFORMATION AND DO RESEARCH. I'M STILL GETTING E-MAIL.

GIVING ME INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT A BACKING MARKET THE SHORT-TERM RENTAL IS. AND BEING ABLE TO GO OUT AND BUY PROPERTIES. YOU HAVE PEOPLE BUYING PROPERTIES ALL OVER THE COUNTRY.

WHEN YOU GET PEOPLE THAT AREN'T HERE AND ARE MONITORING WHAT IS GOING ON. THEY DON'T HAVE CONCERNS WITH WHAT'S HAPPENING IN OUR COMMUNITY.

ALSO WHEN YOU'VE GOT OUT OF STATE OWNERS THAT MONEY THAT THEY ARE MAKING THAT'S LEAVING OUR COMMUNITY.

THAT'S GOING RIGHT OUT THE DOOR AND GOING SOMEWHERE ELSE AND AGAIN THEY ARE NOT CONCERNED WITH WHAT'S HAPPENING. THEY ARE NOT HAVING TO LIVE LIKE THE NEIGHBORHOOD HAS HAPPENED TO LIVE IN IT.

ALSO WHAT WAS REFERENCED LAST WEEK IS YOU KNOW WHY WE CAN'T COMPROMISE ON THIS. ACTUALLY, THERE HAS BEEN COMPROMISE ON THIS. WHEN I FIRST BROUGHT IT FORWARD. IT'S NOT WHAT WAS PASSED.

I BROUGHT COMPROMISE TO THE TABLE AND THEN WE SPENT MANY HOURS. THERE'S A TIME LIMIT.

>> WE WILL ASK THE COUNCIL PERSON TO CONTINUE BUT WRAP IT UP. COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. THANK YOU MAYOR.

SORRY AGAIN. >> THERE WAS COMPROMISE THAT WAS MADE. WE SPENT SEVERAL HOURS WORKING THROUGH THIS. AND DISCUSSING IT AND TAYLORING IT DOWN TO WHAT THIS COUNCIL BELIEVED WAS GOING TO BE FOR OUR COMMUNITY.

I WOULD ASK THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THIS AND ALLOW IT TO STAND AS IT IS SO THAT WE CAN LOOK OUT FOR THE RESIDENTS IN

[02:00:01]

>> NOW COUNCIL PERSON REDD, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> THE BEDROOMS ARE DANGEROUS.

I NEED TO CHECK MINE FOR MY SMOKE ALARM, I SUPPOSE.

AGAIN THIS IS JUST A GUIDE THAT HE WANTS TO BE EXEMPT FROM THIS BECAUSE HE JUST WANTS TO RENT OUT THE ROOM WHICH IS IN HIS HOUSE. AND HE DOESN'T RENT IT OUT VERY OFTEN. HE PAYS MORE IN THE FEES THAN THE MONEY THAT HE TAKES IN. IT WAS SAID THE HOW LONG WOULD IT BE? THE AMENDMENT HERE SAYS IT'S IN THE CALENDAR YEAR. SIX MONTHS.

AND IT'S JUST NOT -- HE WANTS TO RENT OUT HIS BEDROOM.

I DIDN'T THINK THAT YOU KNOW THAT FOR ME EVERYBODY HAS A BEDROOM. AND I DON'T KNOW IF SOMEONE COMES TO YOUR HOUSE AND CHECKS A SMOKE ALARM OR CHECKS FOR A CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR.

MAYBE WE ALL LIVE IN UNSAFE ENVIRONMENT.

BUT IN ANY CASE IF I MAY, THINK LANCE SAID AT THE LAST MEETING WE SHOULD MAKE AN AMENDMENT TO INSERT THE WORD "OR." I'M NOT MAKING A MOTION TO CALL FOR THE QUESTION. BUT I WOULD LIKE TO -- HE DID THAT FOR ME. I WOULD LIKE TO AMEND THIS IF

I PAY. >> WE'LL GET COPIES OF THE AMENDMENT BEFORE US AND THEN I WILL COME TO YOU COUNCIL PERSON RED D TO EXPLAIN THE AMENDMENT.

>> THIS CLARIFIES A NUMBER ONE IF THE END NUMBER ONE IT JUST SAYS LIKE THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING OR TO INDIVIDUALS. TO CLARIFY THAT.

AND AT THE END YOU TAKE OUT THE WORD AND NUMBER 3 SAID OR INDIVIDUALS. KIND OF HOUSEKEEPING THING.

WE CLEANED UP. I MOVE FOR APPROVAL OF THE

AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED. >>> MOTIONS BEEN PAID.

FOR THE AMENDMENT TO THIS AMENDMENT.

I HAVE THREE PEOPLE ON THE LIST.

DO YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT?

>> COUNCIL PERSON ALLEN? >> I ALSO HAVE PARLIAMENTARY QUESTION I WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS REAL QUICK.

>> WHEN WE -- OKAY THIS IS FINANCE REPORT.

I THANKS. BUT THE FINANCE PERSON IS THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE COMMITTEE. WHY IS IT THAT SHE WAS ABLE TO SPEAK HER PIECE ON THAT -- ON THAT WITHOUT HAVING TO GO BEHIND THE SPONSOR?

>> MY RESPONSE IS THIS. I DON'T WANT TO ENDURE THE DISPLEASURE OF THE MAYOR. BUT I BELIEVE HE SHOULD HAVE LET THE SPONSOR SPEAK FIRST. BUT HE IS CHAIR.

THE SPONSOR GETS TO BE CALLED ON FIRST.

>> EVEN PROBABLY. EVEN IF IT GOES TO A COMMITTEE. THAT COMMITTEE PERSON IN CHARGE OF THE COMMITTEE JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE CHAIR DOESN'T GET TO SPEAK ON MY I WOULD LIKE TO LEGS THE SPONSOR KNOW. I WOULD LIKE THE CHANGES.

I WOULD VOTE FOR IT. THANKS.

>> WE HAVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT IN FRONT OF US.

DO YOU WISH TO DISCUSS THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT?

>> YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >> THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT I DO APPRECIATE THAT.

IF ANYONE FALLS UNDER THESE THREE THINGS.

THAT'S THE INCOME GUIDELINE. YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW YOU GET TO HAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE OPPORTUNITY TO YOU KNOW SHARE IN OR REAP THE BENEFITS OF THE GREAT EVENTS THAT CLARKSVILLE MAY HAVE FOR PEOPLE THAT MAY NOT WANT TO THEMSELVES DO SHORT-TERM RENTALS FOR A LONG SPAN OF TIME. THEY WANT TO MAKE SOME MONEY TO PROVIDE FOR THEIR FAMILY FOR THAT LITTLE BIT OF FINE.

NOT THEMSELVES. >> I WOULD SPEAK FOR THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT. MY APOLOGIES.

>> OKAY. >> COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN, DID YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT?

[02:05:03]

>> YOU ARE RECOGNIZED ON THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT.

>> JUST LIKE TO POINT OUT IT WAS STATED THIS WAS DONE BECAUSE ONE OWNER WANTED TO YOU KNOW BE ABLE TO RENT OUT HIS ONE BEDROOM AND YOU KNOW BECAUSE THE FEES AND EVERYTHING IT COST MORE THAN WHAT HE'S BRINGING IN.

JUST BECAUSE HE JUST RENTS IT OUT A LITTLE BIT.

SO WE'RE MAKING A VERY REACTIVE CHANGE FOR ONE INDIVIDUAL, HOWEVER THIS AMENDMENT BY PUTTING "OR "AND "OR" THIS MEANS ANYONE THAT FALLS UNDER ANY ONE OF THE CATEGORIES. IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT ONE INDIVIDUAL PERSON THAT SAID I WISH THAT I DIDN'T HAVE TO DO THIS. IT'S NOW ANYBODY THAT FALLS UNDER THIS AND ANY LOOPHOLE THAT THEY CAN WORK TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN. I'M GOING TO ASK THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THIS AMENDMENT ESPECIALLY IF THE INTENTION OF THE SPONSOR WAS BECAUSE HE WANTED TO TAKE CARE OF ONE INDIVIDUAL THAT CONTACTED HIM.

COUNCIL PERSON EVANS DO YOU WISH TO DISCUSS THE AMENDMENT

TO THE AMENDMENT >> YES.

I WOULD LIKE TO THANKS THE SPONSOR OF THIS AMENDMENT.

I DON'T GET TO DO THAT OFTEN. I REALLY LIKE THIS.

I WAS AGAINST THE SHORT-TERM RENTAL REGULATION IN THE FIRST PLACE. I ALSO WOULD LIKE TO SAY I DON'T THINK THAT THIS APPLIES TO THE ONE PERSON.

I THINK IT WAS BROUGHT UP MAYBE BY THIS ONE PERSON.

BUT I THINK THERE'S SEVERAL PEOPLE IN OUR COMMUNITY THAT ARE IN THIS SAME SITUATION. SO I WILL BE VOTING FOR THIS AMENDMENT AND ENCOURAGE EVERYONE ELSE TO AS WELL.

THANK YOU. >> OKAY.

ANYONE ELSE WISH TO ADDRESS THE AMENDMENT TO THE

AMENDMENT? >> SEEING NONE.

ARE YOU READY TO VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT? EVERY MEMBER CAST YOUR VOTED. EVERY MEMBER VOTED.

EVERY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE THEIR VOTE.

>> 7 YES, 4, NO. ZERO ABSTAIN IN THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDMENT IS ADOPTED. WE'RE BACK TO THE AMENDMENT AS AMENDED. COUNCIL PERSON REDD, YOU ARE THE SPONSOR, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> SOMETIMES WE DON'T GIVE CREDENCE TO THE CUSTOMER THAT HAS TO GO PLACES THAT WAS SPOKEN BY PREVIOUS SPEAKER IN IF YOU GO HOTEL PEOPLE REGULARLY CHECK THE SMOKE ALARM THERE. I THINK THAT'S THE CUSTOMERS WILL DO THINGS LIKE THAT. AND THEY CAN -- THEY WILL INSPECT THE SHORT-TERM RENTAL IN WHICH THEY WILL BE STAYING. THE GOVERNMENT CAN'T BE EVERYWHERE AND BE ALL THINGS TO ALL PEOPLE AT ALL THE TIME TO MAKE THE SURE THE SMOKE ALARM IS WORKING.

AND WE HAVE ORDINANCES THAT SOMETIMES IT'S NOT UNUSUAL THAT THEY HAVE TO BE TWEAKED OR MODIFIED.

AND THERE'S SOME LITTLE AREA OF COMMON SENSE THAT'S IN AN WE'RE NOT MAKING THIS FOR ONE PERSON.

THIS ONE PERSON THAT IS EFFECTED THAT HAPPENED TO CONTACT ME AND HE JUST SIMPLY SAID, LOOK, I DON'T HAVE A SHORT-TERM RENTAL FOR MORE THAN SIX MONTHS OUT OF THE YEAR AND I JUST WOULD LIKE -- I THINK IT WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA IF PEOPLE LIKE ME COULD BE EXEMPT.

THE ORDINANCE WON'T JUST APPLY TO HIM.

IT WILL APPLY TO EVERYBODY. AND I JUST THINK IT'S TO ME IT'S JUST PRETTY MUCH COMMON SENSE.

AND I DON'T SEE REALLY THAT BIG OF A DEAL IN THIS MINOR CHANGE TO AN ORDINANCE. I WOULD ASK YOU TO VOTE YES.

>> COUNCIL PERSON REDD. COUNCIL PERSON ALLEN.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO CALL FOR THE QUESTION

>> THE QUESTION HAS BEEN CALLED AND PROPERLY SECONDED.

>> ANY OBJECTION. HEARING NONE.

WE WILL VOTE ON THE ORDINANCE AS AMENDED.

WE'RE VOTING ON THE ORDINANCE AS AMENDED.

EVERY MEMBER CAST YOUR VOTE. EVERY MEMBER VOTED.

ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE THEIR VOTE?

MADAM CLERK, TAKE THE VOTE. >> 7 YES.

FOUR NOS. ZERO ABSTAINED.

ORDINANCE AS AMEND AMENDMENTED -- AMENDED IS ADOPTED. CHAIRMAN STREETMAN, YOU ARE

RECOGNIZED. >> ORDINANCE 3-2021-22.

[02:10:01]

>> MOTION BEEN MADE FOR APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 3.

GO AHEAD. >> IT DEPARTMENT CREATED IN 2000 STARTED ONE EMPLOYEE. IT DEPARTMENT HAS GROWN TO 13 EMPLOYEES AND HANDLED ALL TECHNOLOGY WITH NO DEFINED RESPONSIBILITY WITHIN CITY CODE.

THIS ORDINANCE WILL ESTABLISH RESPONSIBILITY FOR IT DEPARTMENT AND THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER AND ESTABLISH REGULATION FOR ACQUISITIONS OF TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES FOR THE CITIES. SOME OF THE HIGHLIGHTS OF THENANCE IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IT DEPARTMENT TO MAINTAIN INSTALL UPGRADE AND SUPPORT ALL TECHNOLOGY, PROVIDE INTERNET SECURITY, BACKUP DATA. RESEARCH SYSTEMS AND PROVIDE TECHNICAL EXPERTISE, PROVIDE TECHNOLOGY SERVICE TO ALL DEPARTMENTS, SOME OF THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER IS TO MANAGE AND COORDINATE SYSTEMS COORDINATE SOFTWARE, ACQUISITIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION, OVERSEE THE NETWORK.

PREPARE THE ANNUAL IT BUDGET. COORDINATE TECHNOLOGY WITH DEPARTMENTS, PROVIDE LEADERSHIP TO THE CITY COUNCIL. MAYOR AND DIRECTORS ON THE ALIGNMENT OF TECHNOLOGY WITH CITY INITIATIVES OVERSEE THE IT EMPLOYEES. AND ALL CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION SYSTEM ARE SUBJECT TO ANY MANAGEMENT CONTROL AGREEMENT BY TBI OR OTHER CRIMINAL JUSTICE AGENCIES. THEY ARE MANAGED BY THE CHIEF OF POLICE WHO WILL COORDINATE AND CONSULT WITH IT.

AND THEN IN REGARD TO ACQUISITION OF TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES, IT WILL ASSIST THE DEPARTMENT IN PURCHASING TECHNOLOGY TO ENSURE COMBATABLE WITH EXISTING SYSTEMS. THIS NEW CODE IS HOW THE DEPARTMENT CURRENTLY OPERATES.

I T IS NOT CHANGING CODE. THEY PUT IN WRITING AND PUT IN IT OUR CODE. ALSO I WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE AN AMENDMENT TO AND THIS CLEANUP SECTION 1-11 PLEASE CHANGE THE WORD SECTION TO CHAPTER.

IT'S VERY MUCH AS WE SAID BEFORE A ERROR.

IT'S JUST CHANGE IT. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE WE

CHANGE SECTION TO CHAPTER. >> OKAY.

YOU'VE HEARD THE EXPLANATION. YOU HEARD THE MOTION.

ON THE AMENDMENT TO CHANGE A WORD FROM SECTION TO CHAPTER.

DO I HEAR A SECOND ON THE AMENDMENT?

>> SECOND. >> GIVE IT A CHANCE TO COME AROUND THE HORN. WE'VE GOT A MOTION AND PROPERLY SECONDED TO AMENDMENT ORDINANCE 3 TO CHANGE THE WORD SECTION TO CHAPTER.

ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING THE AMENDMENT? SEEING NONE, ARE YOU READY TO VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT? OKAY. PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 3. EVERY MEMBER VOTED.

ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE THEIR VOTE?

MADAM CLERK, TAKE THE VOTE. >> 11 YES.

ZERO NO. ZERO ABSTAIN.

THE AMENDMENT THE ADOPTED. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS REGARDING ORDINANCE 3 AS AMENDED. SEEING NONE ARE YOU READY TO

VOTE? >> AS SOON AS THE COMPUTER READY FOR US. WE WILL VOTE.

IS THAT US MADAM CLERK. EVERY MEMBER CAST YOUR VOTE.

EVERY MEMBER VOTED. ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE THEIR VOTE? MADAM CLERK TAKE THE VOTE.

>> 11 YES. ZERO NO.

ZERO ABSTAINED. >> CHAIRPERSON STREETMAN YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. ORDINANCE 5-2021-22 FIRST READING. AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF EASEMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR WHITFIELD ROAD NEEDMORE ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT AND

[02:15:02]

THIS WAS COVER MAKE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL.

>> MOTION MADE AND PROPERLY SECONDED.

YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. THIS WAS COVERED IN GREAT DETAIL. LAST WEEK.

AND I KNOW IT'S BEEN PRESENTED BOTH TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE WHO APPROVED AND THE ALSO PRESENTED IN THE ONE OF THE OTHER COMMITTEES. BECAUSE I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE WERE EXCITED ON THIS ONE.

I WOULD ASK THAT WE APPROVE THIS.

BECAUSE THIS IS FOR BENEFIT FOR OUR CITY AS WELL AS THE

OTHER INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED. >> THANK YOU, WE HAVE A QUESTION COUNCIL PERSON RENTAL A REYNOLD.

>> THIS IS NECESSARY AND PRESENTED BECAUSE OF LACK OF PLANNING. WE HAD TO TAKE A HOUSE.

AND WE HAD TO TAKE A PART OF ANOTHER PERSON'S PROPERTY TO EXPAND OUR INFRASTRUCTURE. AND WE CONTINUE TO VOTE FOR ZONING WITHOUT PAYING ATTENTION TO INFRASTRUCTURE.

>> THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER COMMENT OR QUESTION REGARDING THIS ORDINANCE FIVE? SE SEEING NONE, ARE YOU READY TO

VOTE? >> ALL MEMBERS CAST YOUR VOTE. EVERY MEMBER VOTED.

ANY MEMBER WITHISH TO CHANGE THEIR VOTE? MADAM CLERK. TAKE THE VOTE.

>> 11 YES, ZERO NO. ZERO ABSTAINED.

>> CHAIRPERSON STREETMAN YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

RESOLUTION 1-2021-22 AUTHORIZING ENTER LEGAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CLARKSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT. CLARKSVILLE FIRE RESCUE.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF. MONTGOMERY COUNTY VOLUNTEER FIRE SERVICE. MONTGOMERY COUNTY EMS AND CLARKSVILLE MONTGOMERY COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM FOR THE HANDLE WITH PILOT PROGRAM PUBLIC SAFETY AND FINANCE COMMITTEES VOTED FOR APPROVAL. I SO MOVE INSTEAD

>> MOTION BEEN MADE AND PROPERLY SECONDED IN FAVOR OF

RESOLUTION ONE. >> THANK YOU.

>> COUNCIL PERSON ALLEN, YOU WISH TO BE RECOGNIZED ON

RESOLUTION ONE. >> YES.

>> YOU'RE RECOGNIZED. >> I ACTUALLY DID A LOT OF RESEARCH ON THIS. I LOVE THE HAND WALL CARE.

I LOVE THE PROBLEM. TENNESSEE ADOPTED THIS PROGRAM. I THINK WHAT'S MISSING OUT OF OUR INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT IS DISCLOSURE.

WHO IS GOING TO DISCLOSE IT NOW.

I DID GET E-MAIL FROM THE CHIEF THAT SAID THAT THE SCHOOL IS PLANNING ON DOING IT.

I THINK THAT AS TIME GOES BY SOMEONE MAY FORGET THE DO IT.

I THINK THAT NEEDS TO BE SOMETHING OUTLINED INSIDE OF OUR INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT SO WE KNOW EXACTLY WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR IT IN THAT AGREEMENT.

I KNOW THEY HAVE MEETING COMING UP TO DISCUSS THOSE THINGS. I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO MOVE TO NEXT REGULAR SESSION.

SECOND. >> YOU HEARD THE MOTION TO POSTPONE TO THE NEXT REGULAR SESSION.

WHICH IS SEPTEMBER THE 2ND. COUNCIL PERSON REYNOLDS, YOU ARE ON THE LIST. DO YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO

MOTION TO POSTPONE? >> YES.

I WILL SPEAK TO IT. >> YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

I ALSO HAD SOME CONCERNS WITH SOME OF THE MOSTLY WITH THE RELEASE OF INFORMATION. AS I'VE MENTIONED BEFORE I WAS HEALTHCARE PROVIDER ALL MY LIFE.

I WORKED FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER ALL MY LIFE.

I ALSO REACHED OUT AND DID RESEARCH ON THIS.

I HAVE AN E-MAIL FROM MISS ASHLEY DALE WHO IS LEAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COUNCILOR. SHE INDICATED THAT THEY ARE WORKING ON THE PROCESS. ONCE THIS IS A I APPROVED THE WILL WORK TO MANAGE HOW TO SOCIALIZE IT AND HOW TO INFORM THE PARENTS. FOR THE PUBLIC WHO ARE LISTENING AT HOME IF YOU MAY NOT KNOW, WHAT WILL BE RELEASED TO THE SCHOOL IS A CHILD'S NAME, AGE, AND SCHOOL IN THE FIRST RESPONDER WILL RELEASE THE CHILD'S NAME AGE AND SCHOOL. AND THEY WILL SEND CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE TO THE CHILD'S SCHOOL BEFORE THE CHILD STARTS THE NEXT DAY. THIS INFORMATION WILL BE GIVEN ACCEPT FOR THE CHILD'S TIME AND ONLY THREE WORDS WHICH ARE HANDLE WITH CARE. SO ADDITIONALLY, SHE ALSO INDICATED THAT THIS IS A NATIONWIDE INITIATIVE.

IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT IS STARTED IN OUR COMMUNITY.

I FEEL AT THIS POINT THAT I FEEL CONFIDENT THAT BETWEEN THE FIRST RESPONDERS AND THE SCHOOL SYSTEM THAT THEY WILL HANDLE THIS APPROPRIATELY. I DO NOT FEEL THAT WE NEED TO

DELAY IT. >> COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED ON THE MOTION TO POSTPONE.

>> YES, SIR. >> YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> I TOO AGREE WITH THE PREVIOUS SPEAKER THAT I DO NOT BELIEVE WE FEED NEED TO POSTPONE.

THIS NATIONAL PROGRAM. THIS PROGRAM IS NOW UNDER WAY IN NEARLY 30 STATES AND BEING IMPLEMENTED ACROSS TENNESSEE WITH THE SUPPORT OF THE TENNESSEE ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF POLICE AND THE SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION OF

[02:20:03]

THIS IS NO WAY GOING TO CHANGE ANY PROCESS THAT HAS BEEN GOING ON ALL THIS DOES SIMPLY ADD WHERE THAT AS PREVIOUSLY STATED THE E-MAIL GOING TO THE SCHOOL.

TO LET THE SCHOOL KNOW THAT THERE WAS YOU KNOW THEY NEED TO HAND WALL CARE. IT COULD BE ANYTHING THAT COULD HAVE OCCURRED. IT COULD HAVE BEEN A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT. A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SITUATION. HOUSE FIRE.

MEDICAL EMERGENCY IN THE HOME.

A DRUG INVESTIGATION AT THE HOME.

POLICE TRY TO IDENTIFY CHILDREN AT THE SCENE.

FIND OUT WHERE THEY GO TO SCHOOL AND SEND THE SCHOOL OR AGENCY CONFIDENTIAL E-MAIL THAT SAYS HANDLE JOHNNIE WITH CARE. THAT'S IT.

THERE'S NO OTHER DETAILS NEEDED.

AGAIN AN INVESTIGATION WOULD ALREADY BE GOING INTO EFFECT.

ANYTHING THAT WOULD BE OCCURRING WOULD ALREADY BE OCCURRING. ALL THIS IS, IS SIMPLY TRYING TO AVOID AN ADVERSE CHILD EXPERIENCE.

I ASK THAT WE DON'T POSTPONE THIS AND GO AHEAD AND GET THIS IN PLACE AND GET THIS WORKING.

BECAUSE IT'S JUST A VERY SIMPLE PROCESS ADDITIONAL BENEFIT FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CHILDREN IN OUR COMMUNITY. THANK YOU.

>> ANYONE ELSE WISH TO ADDRESS THE MOTION TO

POSTPONE? >> YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

COUNCIL PERSON ALLEN. >> LIKE I SAID A MINUTE AGO.

IT'S NOT THAT I DON'T AGREE WITH THE PROGRAM OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IT'S AN AMAZING PROGRAM.

I LOOKED AT OTHER CITIES. THEY HAVE A PIECE THAT AGREEMENT THAT TALKS ABOUT DISCLOSING TO PARENT.

WHEN I TALK ABOUT DISCLOSING TO PAINT.

IT COULD BE DONE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE SCHOOL YEAR.

SOMETHING THAT THE PARENT PHYSICALLY HAS THAT SHOWS THEM THAT THIS IS HAPPENING IN OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM.

BECAUSE THEY COULD VERY WELL GO BACK AND SAY I DIDN'T KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THIS. TEACHER ENDED FINDING WHAT HAPPENED IN MY HOUSE. IT ALL STARTED WITH AN E-MAIL. GO HEAD ON.

LET'S GET THE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT IN THERE.

IT'S NOT THAT I DON'T AGREE WITH THE PROGRAM.

I'M A SOCIAL WORKER. I BELIEVE IN IT.

WE HAVE TO THAT PARENTAL DISCLOSURE.

SO THEY KNOW. IN EVERY OTHER ONE THAT I READ THE HANDLE WITH CARE THERE IS THAT DISCLOSURE.

WE DON'T WANT IT TO HAPPEN AFTER THE FACT.

BECAUSE WE ALL KNOW THAT IF THIS PERSON THINKS I'M DOING AND THINK PERSON THINKS I MATE NOT HAPPEN.

THAT'S ALL I'M SAYING. THANK YOU.

COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN. >> THANK YOU MAYOR.

MOTION TO POSTPONE? >> AGAIN I DON'T THINK WE SHOULD POSTPONE. LET'S MOVE FORWARD RATHER THAN MAKING CHANGES. IT'S A VERY SIMPLE THING WE'VE GOT IN PLACE. WE'RE PUTTING THIS OUT TO THE PUBLIC BY HAVING THIS MEETING NOW.

NO DOUBT IT WOULD BE RELEASED TO PUBLIC THAT WE WOULD HAVE A PROGRAM LIKE THIS. IT'S NOT GOING TO HAVE ANY OF THE INFORMATION FOR THE TEACHERS OR THE SCHOOL OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT TO BE ABLE TO GET THE INFORMATION.

LET'S GO AHEAD AND GET THIS IN PLACE AND START TAKING CARE OF CHILDREN RIGHT AWAY RATHER THAN HAVING TO WAIT.

COUNCIL PERSON BUTLER, DID YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE

MOTION TO POSTPONE? >> YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> I WILL BE VOTING NO AGAINST THIS.

UNLESS THERE'S SOMETHING PUT INTO IT THAT INCLUDES PARENTAL CONSENT. MY KIDS ARE MY BUSINESS.

AND IF WE'RE GOING TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS.

IT'S DANGER SURE GOING TO BE MY CONSENT TO IT.

AND I APPRECIATE THIS SPONSOR.

LET'S GET THIS FIXED. THAT'S IMPORTANT.

THANK YOU. >> COUNCIL PERSON REDD, YOU

ARE RECOGNIZED. >> THIS THE ALSO A RESOLUTION. THERE'S NO SECOND READING.

>> WE VOTE ON THIS ONCE AND WE'RE DONE.

I VOTE TO POSTPONE. >> OKAY.

>> ANYONE ELSE HAVE COMMENT REGARDING THE MOTION TO POSTPONE UNTIL SEPTEMBER 2ND REGULAR SESSION?

>> OKAY. ARE YOU READY TO VOTE? MADAM CLERK. WE'RE READY TO VOTE.

THIS IS MOTION TO POSTPONE. OKAY.

HERE WE GO. EVERY MEMBER CAST YOUR VOTE.

EVERY MEMBER VOTED. MY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE THEIR VOTE. MADAM CLERK, TAKE THE VOTE.

FIVE YES, SIX NO. ZERO ABSTAIN.

MOTION TO POSTPONE FAILS. WE'RE BACK ON RESOLUTION ONE.

AS PROPOSED. COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN DO

YOU WISH TO BE RECOGNIZED. >> HAND WALL CARE PROVIDES

[02:25:02]

MISS ARE TRAINED TO IDENTIFY CHILDREN AT THE SCENE, FIND OUT WHERE THEY GO TO SCHOOL. AND SEND THE SCHOOL AND AGENCY CONFIDENTIAL E-MAIL THAT SAYS HANDLE WITH CARE.

ADDITIONALLY, THIS PROGRAM IN THE ALERT SYSTEM PROVIDED TO THE SCHOOL SYSTEM DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF ANY REQUIRED REFERRALS NEED INITIATION BY THE OFFICER.

IF THE CHILD IS ALLEGED VICTIM OF AN INCIDENT OFFICERS WILL HAVE ALREADY BEGAN INVESTIGATION AND COMPLETED THE APPROPRIATE REFERRALS.

TEACHER HAVE BEEN TRAINED ON THE IMPACT OF TRAUMA ON LEARNING. AND INCORPORATING MANY INTERVENTIONS TO MITIGATE THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF TRAUMA FOR IDENTIFIED STUDENT INCLUDING SENDING STUDENTS TO THE CLINIC FOR REST WHEN HANDLE WITH CARE HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND THE CHILD IS HAVING TROUBLE STAYING AWAKE.

RETEACHING LESSONS, POSTPONING TESTING.

SMALL GROUP COUNSELING BY SCHOOL COUNCILORS AND REFERRALS TO COUNSELING. SCHOOL ALSO IMPLEMENTED MANY SCHOOLWIDE INTERVENTIONS TO HELP CREATE A TRAUMA SENSITIVE SCHOOL ON A 3 TIER LEVEL.

WHEN IDENTIFIED STUDENT EXHIBIT CONTINUED BEHAVIORAL OR EMOTIONAL PROBLEMS IN THE CLASSROOM THE COUNCILOR OR PRINCIPAL REFERS TO PARENT TO COUNSELING AGENCY.

WHICH PROVIDES TRAUMA FOCUS THERAPY.

ONCE THE COUNSELING AGENCY RECEIVED A REFERRAL IN PARENTAL CONSENT STUDENTS CAN RECEIVE ON SITE COUNSELING.

AGAIN WE ARE JUST TALKING ABOUT AVOIDING ADVERSE CHILD EXPERIENCE. MAYBE THE CHILD USING ONE EXAMPLE. THERE WAS FIRE AT THE HOME.

THERE WAS AN ACCIDENT SOMETHING THAT CAUSED CHILD TO BE UP EXCEPTIONALLY LATE. MAYBE THEIR DOG WAS HIT.

THAT'S GOING TO BE TRAUMATIC TO 6 OR 7-YEAR-OLD.

THINGS LIKE THAT, THAT MAY HAVE KEPT THEM UP LATE.

CAUSING THEM TO FALL ASLEEP IN CLASS THE NEXT DAY.

RATHER THAN THE TEACHER MAKING AN EXAMPLE OF THAT STUDENT RECOGNIZING THAT SOMETHING HAS GONE ON IN THEIR LIFE. MAYBE AGAIN THEY SHOULD GO TO CLINIC TO GET REST. THIS IS JUST SOMETHING VERY SIMPLE. SOMETHING INSTITUTED THROUGHOUT OUR COUNTRY. IN 30 STATES AND ALL ACROSS TENNESSEE. I WOULD ASK THAT YOU SUPPORT AGAIN FOR THE BENEFIT OF THOSE IN OUR COMMUNITY.

>> COUNCIL PERSON BUTLER, YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> A QUESTION TO MY COLLEAGUE.

DID YOU SAY WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO CALL NAMES.

DID YOU SAY THAT MOST OTHER CITIES THAT YOU RESEARCHED HAVE A CLAUSE IN HERE THAT INCLUDES PARENTAL CONSENT OR

DISCLOSURE? >> YES, THEY DO.

I ACTUALLY CALLED SEVERAL PROGRAMS AND THEY SAID AT THE BEGINNING OF THE SCHOOL THEY ACTUALLY SEND OUT WHERE THAT WHOLE PACKET OF FORMS SOMETHING THAT JUST YOU KNOW THEY CAN SIGN JUST LIKE THEY SIGN -- EVERYTHING ELSE.

SO THAT THE PARENT CAN KNOW THAT THIS HAPPENING.

I WOULD HATE TO SEE A PARENT. >> COUNCIL PERSON BUTLER.

>> THAT WAS MY ONLY QUESTION. I'M GOING TO SAY AGAIN.

AND I SAY THIS BECAUSE I HAVE TO JUSTICE JUSTIFY THE FACT THAT I WILL VOTE NO ON THIS. BECAUSE I LOVE THIS PROGRAM.

I AGREE WITH THIS PROGRAM. BUT GOOD IDEAS DO NOT REQUIRE FORCE AND YOU WILL NOT FORCE ME YOU SHOULD ASK FOR MY CONSENT WHEN IT COMES TO MY KIDS.

MAYBE I'M GETTING SUPERHIGHLY EMOTIONAL ABOUT THIS BECAUSE I HAVE FOUR KIDS. LOTS OF PARENTS ARE OUT THERE. THEY HAVE TO RIGHT TO SAY WHO ARE TALKING ABOUT THEIR KIDS. IT'S ABSOLUTELY THE FAMILY AND THE PARENTS BUSINESS FIRST.

THANK YOU. >> COUNCIL PERSON ALLEN.

YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >> YES.

I WOULD LIKE TO SAY IMAGINE BEING THAT PARENT.

THAT HAS HAD SOMETHING HAPPEN.

THEN THAT WHOLE SHARO HAPPENS.

HAND WALL CARE JUST A SMALL E-MAIL.

BUT IN WHAT I READ IN WHAT I SAW THERE'S A LOT OF DIFFERENT COMPONENTS TO HANDLE WITH CARE.

MISS SYLVIA. CAN WE WATCH THE VIDEO.

THERE'S -- IT'S NOT JUST A SIMPLE E-MAIL.

THERE'S A WHOLE BUNCH OF THINGS THAT CAN HAPPEN AFTERWARD. IF THEY DON'T KNOW THAT CAN HAPPEN AFTERWARD. I THINK IT'S A PROBLEM.

SO WE SHOULD AND I UNDERSTAND THIS SCHOOL SYSTEM ALREADY SAID OKAY WE WILL SEND OUT SOMETHING.

WE ALL KNOW IF IT'S NOT OUTLINED.

NO ONE HAS TO DO IT. AND I THINK WE WOULD BE DOING OUR PARENTS A DISSERVICE IF WE WERE TO VOTE THIS IN AND NOT GIVE THEM MAKE SURE THAT RIGHTS ARE PUT IN THERE.

THIS THE WHAT WE'RE DOING. I'M NOT SAYING CONSENT AT THIS POINT. I'M SAYING DISCLOSURE.

AND IT'S IN THERE EVERY YEAR WHEN THESE KIDS GO TO SCHOOL.

NEXT YEAR THEY MAY NOT DO ONE.

[02:30:01]

EVERYBODY KNOWS ABOUT IT. I THINK THERE SHOULD BE SOMETHING IN OUR AGREEMENT. I LOVE THE PROGRAM.

I'M NOT DEBATING THE FACTS. I LOVE IT.

I ASKED 43 AND THEY TOLD ME IT NEEDS TO BE DISCLOSED.

THANK YOU. >> WE HAVE A REQUEST TO SHOW THIS VIDEO ABOUT THE HANDLE WITH CARE.

IF YOU DON'T MIND.

THEN THAT INFORMATION GOES TO THE THEY WOULD ACTUALLY GET IN TOUCH WITH THAT SCHOOL. BASICALLY THE E-MAIL LETS THEM KNOW THE CHILD BELOW WAS INVOLVED IN A POTENTIALLY TRAUMATIC EVENT. THAT THEY WERE A WITNESS OR A VICTIM TO THIS EVENT. AND NOTIFY YOUR SCHOOL COUNCILOR OR SOCIAL WORKER IF YOU NOTICE ANYTHING DIFFERENT. IT DOES VARY SPECIFICALLY EXPLAIN PLEASE DO NOT ASK THE CHILD WHAT HAPPENED.

I GOT THIS REPORT. I KNOW THE POLICE CAME TO YOUR HOUSE. IT'S THE OBSERVATION FOR THEM TO KNOW HEY, SOMETHING HAPPENED.

I NEED TO JUST KIND OF KEEP AN EYE ON LITTLE JOHNNIE.

>> IT'S NOT MY JOB TO INVESTIGATE.

IT'S MY JOB TO CHECK ON THE STUDENT AND MAKE SURE THEY ARE OKAY. SOMETIMES WE'RE COME IN HERE AND THE LIBRARY AND WE WILL JUST SIT BACK ON THE COUCH AND WE JUST TALK. THEY WILL HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH ME. THEY FEEL COMFORTABLE.

THEY ARE SAFE. THEY KNOW THEY ARE IN THE

SAFE PLACE WITH ME. >> ON AVERAGE THERE'S AT LEAST TEN TO 15 A DAY. THE EXCITING THING ABOUT THE WAY HANDLE WITH CARE WORKS HERE IS THAT IT'S ONE PART OF A GREATER SYSTEM OF TRAUMA INFORMED PRACTICES WORK THAT WE'RE DOING. THAT SERVES TO GET KIDS THE SUPPORT THEY NEED BECAUSE IT'S WITHIN A NETWORK OF LOTS OF TRAINING AND AWARENESS FOR EDUCATORS, EVEN FOR OUR STUDENTS, PARENTS AND COMMUNITY ABOUT THE IMPACT OF TRAUMA ON HEALTHY DEVELOPMENTS, ON SCHOOL SUCCESS. AND LIFELONG PHYSICAL OUTCOMES. PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH OUTCOMES FOR STUDENTS. YOU KNOW CONDITIONS MATTER.

TREMENDOUSLY ON A KID'S SUCCESS.

[02:35:02]

WE HAVE THE PLATFORM TORE A REAL CHANGE IN THINKING.

MAYBE THE CONDITION AREN'T RIGHT FOR THIS STUDENT.

MAYBE THERE ARE THINGS GOING ON OUTSIDE OF SCHOOL.

WHAT CAN WE DO IN THE SCHOOL SETTING TO MAKE THE CONDITIONS RIGHT TO SET THEM UP FOR SUCCESS?

THAT'S PART OF THE STORY. >> SAY TO THE STUDENT.

I HAVE CHECKED WITH THEM. I KNOW DEFINITELY SOMETHING HAS HAPPENED. I WOULD THEN I WOULD GO AS FAR AS DOING THE HOME VISIT. BECAUSE IT MAY NOT BE -- IT MAY BE SOMETHING ELSE STILL GOING ON.

AND I FEEL LIKE I NEED TO AT LEAST MAKE THAT CONNECTION THEY NEED TO SEE MY FACE. THEY NEED TO KNOW WE CARE.

I DON'T WANT THEM TO KNOW HOW I FOUND OUT ANYTHING, JUST MAKE IT A CASUAL CARE CALL OR CARE VISIT.

IF A CHILD HAS GROWN UP CONSTANTLY IN DOMESTIC VIOLENT SITUATION WHERE THERE'S YELLING OR FIGHTING.

HOW DO THEY KNOW THAT'S NOT NORMAL? SO THEY DON'T TALK ABOUT IT AT SCHOOL.

UNLESS IT'S A CONVERSATION AND THEN LITTLE JOHNNIE GOES WELL, WAIT A SECOND. WE'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO FIGHT.

MY PARENTS FIGHT EVERY NIGHT. IT CAN BE VERY DIFFICULT.

>> I KNOW I WAS RAISED THAT WE COULDN'T TALK OUTSIDE THE HOME. YOU BETTER NOT GO TO SCHOOL AND SAY THIS OR THAT. AND THAT'S THAT'S KIND OF ONCE YOU KNOW THAT YOU KNOW THAT YOU KNOW THAT YOU CAN'T DO THAT, THEN YOU DON'T DO IT.

BUT YOU ALSO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THAT, THAT'S NOT THE ONLY WAY TO FIND OUT. IF SOMETHING IS GOING ON.

IS TO VERBALLY SPEAK IT. IN TODAY'S WORLD TEACHERS ARE OFTEN THE FIRST RESPONDERS TO CHILDHOOD TRAUMA.

Y BRAIN DEVELOPMENT. EVEN IF JUST MATH YOU CARE ABOUT. YOU'VE GOT TO CARE ABOUT THIS TOO. BECAUSE EMOTIONS ARE THE FAST LANE TO THE BRAIN. WE DON'T WANT TO STIGMATIZE THAT CHILD. ON THE HANDLE WITH CARE, IF THEY ARE VICTIM OR A WITNESS. THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT THEIR FAMILY -- THEIR FOM OR THEIR DAD OR THEIR CAREGIVER WAS THE ONE WHO CAUSED THE INCIDENT.

IT COULD HAVE BEEN AT A FRIENDS HOUSE.

IT DOESN'T AUTOMATICALLY MEAN IT'S THAT CHILD'S CAREGIVER.

WE THEN OFTENTIMES I THEY COME FROM BAD FAMILY.

THAT'S WHY. AND THAT'S JUST NOT THE CASE.

>> COUNCIL PERSON ALLEN ANY FINAL WORDS?

>> AS YOU CAN SEE THE HANDLE WITH CARE PROGRAM IS NOT SIMPLY AN E-MAIL. THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS THAT CAN SNOWBALL FROM THERE. I'M JUST SAYING THAT SOMEWHERE IN OUR AGREEMENT WE NEED TO HAVE IT SAY, THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE DISCLOSURE TO THE PARENT.

GUESS WHAT? WHEN THAT LADY SHOWS UP AT THE HOUSE TO DO A HOME VISIT YOU HAVE THAT BY YOU.

THAT PARENT KNOWS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE TO COME BECAUSE YOUR KID HAD SOME THINGS GOING ON.

PARENTS HAVE RIGHT. AND WE CANNOT -- WANT DO ANYTHING ELSE WITH ANYBODY'S KIDS IN THIS CITY WITHOUT A PARENT KNOWING ABOUT IT. WHY THIS? I'M JUST ASKING FOR DISCLOSURE.

[02:40:03]

THAT'S IT. >> I'M GOING TO VOTE THIS DOWN. UNLESS WE GET THE DISCLOSURE

IN IT. >> COUNCIL PERSON SMITH.

YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >> AFTER LOOKING AT THIS VIDEO, I SEE THERE'S SOME PROS AND CONS ABOUT THIS PROGRAM. ME WHO HAVE SUBSTITUTED AT THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS I HAVE LEARNED THAT PROFESSIONAL PEOPLE CANNOT HOLD WATER. GET A STIGMA ON THE CHILD.

BY WHO I'M SUPPOSED TO BE PROFESSIONAL TEACHERS.

NOT PUTTING TEACHERS DOWN. BUT I'VE SEEN IT HAPPEN.

AND THE POOR CHILD SUFFERED BECAUSE STUDENTS WERE LAUGHING AT THE CHILD. SO I THINK THAT WE NEED TO PUT DISCLOSURE THERE OR MAKE AN OPTION FOR THE PARENTS TO OPT OUT OF THIS IF THEY DON'T WANT THIS TO HAPPEN WITH THEIR CHILD. THEY DON'T WANT THIS HAND WALL CARE PILOT PROGRAM FOR THEIR CHILD.

I KNOW THIS IS PILOT PROGRAM. IT HASN'T BEEN SET UP OR ANYTHING YET. I DON'T THINK IN TENNESSEE.

I JUST THINK SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE IN THERE THAT THE PARENTS CAN OPT OUT. THEY CAN SIGN UP OR A FORM TO SAY WE DON'T CONSENT TO THIS. OR WE DO CONSENT TO THIS.

I THINK THAT WE NEED TO REALLY THINK ABOUT BEFORE WE VOTE ON THIS. IS THIS GOING TO BE GOOD FOR YOUR CHILD. OR YOUR FAMILY.

BECAUSE THE PARENTS HAVE SAY SO OF THE CHILDREN.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY. >> THANK YOU.

>> COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND YOU ARE RECOGNIZED.

>> DO WE HAVE THE VOTING AUTHORITY TO REQUEST PARENTAL DISCLOSURE BE INCLUDED INTO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT OR IS THAT SOMETHING THAT CMCSS OR THE HANDLE WITH CARE ADMINISTRATION HANDLE ON THEIR END AT THE LEVEL OF EXECUTION. BECAUSE FROM MY UNDERSTANDING THIS IS ALREADY WRITTEN AND WE'RE -- WE'RE VOTING ON RESOLUTION TO ADOPT IT FOR THE CITY BUT THEN IT FEELS LIKE THE PARENTAL CONSENT QUESTION WOULD BE SORT OF ADMINISTRATIVE LEVEL BETWEEN THE SCHOOL AND HANDLE WITH CARE FOLKS. COULD SOMEONE MAYBE MISTER BAKER SPEAK TO THAT. I FEEL LIKE THE WAY I READ AND INTERPRETED IT THAT WE NEED TO VOTE AS IT IS.

WE DON'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO UNWRANGLE IT ADDING A CLAUSE WRANGLE IT BACK AND VOTE.

>> YOU'RE RIGHT. IT COMES IN FINAL VERSION AS AN EXHIBIT TO A RESOLUTION. IF YOU APPROVE IT, YOU ARE APPROVING IT AS CURRENTLY WRITTEN.

WHICH DOESN'T CONTAIN ANYTHING ABOUT DISCLOSURE.

THEN YOU SHOULD VOTE THIS DOWN.

AND THEN THE MAYOR THE CHIEF OF POLICE CAN GO BACK TO THE OTHER PARTNERS IN THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT OR UNDERSTANDING AND TELL THEM, HEY THE CITY COUNCIL VOTED IT DOWN IN THE STICKING POINT WAS DISCLOSURE ISSUE.

I LOOKS LIKE WE NEED TO CHANGE THAT OR ADD SOMETHING TO IT. IN ORDER TO GET THE APPROVAL

FROM THE COUNCIL. >> COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND?

>> IT WOULD BE A MATTER OF. I GUESS I HAVE A DANGLE QUESTION. IS THAT SOMETHING THAT EXIST AND WE'RE UNAWARE AND WRANGLING BACK AND FORTH SOMETHING MAY BE IN PLACE IT'S NOT REPRESENTED IN THE WAY WE'RE AWARE. I AGREE.

I WANT THE PARENTS TO HAVE THE RIGHT TO PARENTS TO OPT IN OR OPT OUT OR HAVE DISCLOSURE.

I DON'T WANT TO GO BACK AND FORTH SW SOMETHING THAT EXIST BUT MAY NOT BE REPRESENTED AS WE HAVE THIS --

>> ALL I CAN SAY THERE'S NO KIND OF DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT IN THE CURRENT VERSION.

IF YOU WANT THAT AND YOU DON'T WANT TO APPROVE IT WITHOUT IT. YOU SHOULD VOTE THIS DOWN AND THEN THE CHIEF CAN GO BACK AND TALK TO HIS COUNTER PARTS AT THE SCHOOL SYSTEM AT THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND SAY CITY COUNCIL VOTED IT DOWN IN THE STICKING POINT WAS DISCLOSURE. WE HAVE TO ADD DISCLOSURE TO PARENTS. OR AN OPT IN OR OPT OUT VERSION. YOU COULD DO OPT IN.

YOU COULD DO OPT OUT TO ADDRESS COUNCILMAN

[02:45:06]

>> WE'RE IN PUBLIC SESSION. WE COULDN'T GET MAYBE THE CHIEF TO COME MAYBE OR MEMBER OF CMCSS OR I KNOW.

>> WE CAN'T DO THAT. THERE'S NO ONE THERE REPRESENTING THE SCHOOL DISTRICT.

>> WITH THAT I AM IN AGREEMENT THAT IT DOES SEEM VERY SIMPLE TO PREVIOUS SPEAKERS POINT.

BUT MY PARENTAL CAUTIONARY HEART SAID I WOULD LOVE TO GIVE THE PARENTS. I'M LISTENING TO TWO PARENTS HERE TONIGHT. AND I WOULD HAVE TO GO WITH THEM IF I TOOK MYSELF BACK I WOULD WANT MY MOM TO BE AWARE OF WHAT'S GOING ON WITH ME AND SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST SOMETHING. I DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS WE NEED TO POSTPONE OR VOTE IT DOWN.

WHATEVER WE NEED TO DO TO MAKE SURE THAT'S BEFORE US.

>> OKAY. WE'VE VOTED TO TRY TO POSTPONE. IT WAS FAILED.

THE PROPER MOTION IF -- BECAUSE IF WE VOTE AND IT FAILS THE RED RULE APPLIES.

TAKES A YEAR UNLESS WE DO PROCEDURAL MOTION.

IT WOULD BE PROPER TO RECOMMIT THIS RESOLUTION TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE AND THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE PERHAPS BOTH, THAT'S WHERE THE CHIEF OF POLICE RESIDES TO GIVE THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO WORK ON LANGUAGE IF IT'S ACCEPTABLE TO ALL SIX PARTNERS.

>> I NEED TO MAKE THAT MOTION.

>> YOU CAN MAKE THE MOTION. YOU HAVE THE FLOOR.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMIT -- REFER TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE FOR CHIEF TO GET THOSE ANSWERS THAT SOME OF THE FELLOW MEMBERS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT TO GET THIS BEFORE US AS OPPOSED TO

LOSING THE WHOLE THING. >> SECOND.

>> ALL YOU HEARD THE MISSION TO REFER, COMMISSION RESOLUTION BACK ONEBACK TO PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE.

WE HAVE TWO PEOPLE ON THE LIST.

COUNCIL PERSON REDD, DO YOU WISH TO BE RECOGNIZED.

>> NO. >> OKAY.

ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS REGARDING THE MOTION TO REFER TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE?

COUNCIL PERSON SMITH. >> WE REFER BACK TO COMMITTEE. WE HAVE TO REVOTE ON THIS AGAIN. IT WILL COME BEFORE US WITH THE ADJUSTMENT AND THE CHANGE THAT WE REQUESTED.

>> WE ARE REFERRING TO PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE.

WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT OUR CHIEF OF POLICE WILL GO BACK TO THE SIX PARTNERS. I THINK I COUNTED RIGHT TO TALK WITH THEM ABOUT DISCLOSURE.

AND THEN BRING IT BACK THROUGH THE COMMITTEE.

>> TO BE REVOTED ON. >> YES.

>> YES. >> OKAY.

WE HAVE TO VOTE TO REFER BACK TO PUBLIC SAFETY.

>> YES. WE VOTE ONE TIME.

WE WILL VOTE AGAIN. >> OR NOT.

>> COUNCIL PERSON STREETMAN, DID YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE

REFER TO PUBLIC SAFETY? >> IF IT MEANS IT WILL NOT FAIL. I MEAN, I CAN UNDERSTAND US DOING THIS. THIS PASSED THE FINANCE COMMITTEE AND THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE FOR APPROVAL. AND THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE DISCLOSURE GOING OUT FROM THE CLERK'S MONTGOMERY COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM TO THE PARENTS TO LET THEM KNOW THIS IS GOING ON. I BELIEF THEIR INTENTION TO HAVE A MEETING TOMORROW AFTER ITS APPROVED BY US THE SCHOOLS SEASON GETTING READY TO START.

WITH THAT PACK OATH REQUESTED THAT EVERYBODY GET AT THE BEGINNING OF THE SCHOOL SYSTEM.

>> COUNCIL PERSON ALLEN DO YOU WISH TO SPEAK TO THE MOTION TO REFER TO PUBLIC SAFETY?

>> I WOULD SAY WE NEED THE GO HEAD ON AND REFER BACK TO PUBLIC SAFETY AND THE REASON WHY IS BECAUSE IN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT IT OUTLINES WHAT EACH PERSON IS RESPONSIBLE FOR. IT GIVES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR WHO WILL PUT OUT THE INFORMATION.

THEREFORE IF IT'S NOT IN WRITING.

IT DOES NOT EXIST. WE ALL KNOW THAT.

IF IT'S NOT IN WRITING DOESN'T SAY WE WILL DISCLOSE TO PARENT AND WHO WILL DO IT. WE KNOW THAT IT DOESN'T HAVE TO HAPPEN. I ASK WE KNOW IT HAPPENS.

I ASK WE REFER BACK TO PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE.

>> COUNCIL PERSON RICHMOND, DID YOU WISH TO BE

RECOGNIZED. >> I WAS GOING TO ECHO THAT PRIEST SENTIMENT. I WOULD AIR ON THE SIDE OF CAUTION. I UNDERSTAND THE PR PRIEST CONCERN. AT THIS POINT I AM STARTING TO BE A STICKLER FOR THE IT'S NOT IN PRINT.

IT DOESN'T EXIST. I WOULD LOVE TO BE ABLE TO JUST ASSUME THAT, THAT'S THE THING AND THEN COME BACK LATER AND SAY, OH, THAT INFORMATION WASN'T QUITE ACCURATE OR LOOKS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT THE REST OF THE COUNCIL. I'M NOT A PARENT BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINE. I WOULD LOVE TO VOTE TO PUSH IT FORWARD. BUT ON THE ERROR OF PARENTS I WILL VOLT TO PUT BACK TO PUBLIC SAFETY AND FOR THOSE

[02:50:01]

IT'S AN EFFORT TO MAKE SURE IT'S HEALTHY SO IT GOES FORWARD TO GET OUR PARENTS THE FULL PIECE OF MIND THEY WOULD LIKE TO HAVE CONCERNING THEIR YOUNG PEOPLE.

THANK YOU. >> COUNCIL PERSON REDD DO YOU

WISH TO BE RECOGNIZED? >> THIS IS RESOLUTION.

THERE'S ONE VOTE. I THINK WE'RE WISE TO SEND BACK TO THE COMMITTEE AND MAKE THE COUNCILMEMBERS HAPPY WITH THE RESOLUTION ONCE WE'RE FINISHED WITH IT.

THANK. >> ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY COMMENT OR QUESTION TO REFER TO PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE? SEEING NONE. HEARING NONE.

ARE YOU READY TO VOTE. ALL MEMBERS CAST YOUR VOTE.

EVERY MEMBER VOTED. ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE THEIR VOTE? MADAM CLERK, TAKE THE VOTE.

>> 11 YES, ZERO NOS. ZERO ABSTAIN.

>> MOTION TO REFER PASSES. CHAIRMAN STREETMAN, YOU ARE

RECOGNIZED. THANK YOU >>> RESOLUTION 8 20, 21, 22, DECLARING INTENT AS THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE -- SORRY. HITTING THE MICROPHONE.

THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE TO REIMBURSE ITSELF NOT TO EGGS EED $7.5 MISSION FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES WITH PROCEEDS FROM GENERAL OBLIGATION, BONDS, NOTES OR OTHER DEBT OBLIGATIONS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY. THE FINANCE COMMITTEE VOTED FOR APPROVAL AND I SO MOVE.

>> MOTION I SECOND IN FAVOR OF THIS RESOLUTION ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS?

ARE YOU READY TO VOTE? MADAM CLERK. >> ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE

THEIR VOTE? MADAM CLERK, TAKE THE VOTE. >> 10 YES, 1 NO, 0 ABSTAIN.

>> THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED. CHAIRPERSON STREETMAN, YOU'RE RECOGNIZED.

>> ITEM NUMBER 8 RESOLUTION 10, 21, 22, DESCENT DECREE IN THE CASE OF RIVER KEEPERS VERSUS CITY. FINANCE COMMITTEE VOTED FOR APPROVAL AND I SO MOVE.

>> MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND PROPERLY SECONDED IN FAVOR OF RESOLUTION 10.

COUNCIL PERSON SMITH YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >> YES.

>>> COULD YOU ELABORATE? >> SO WE GOT SUED IN A LAWSUIT BY THE GROUP -- NONPROFIT GROUP CALLED TENNESSEE RIVER KEEPERS. THEY SUED US IN FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT IN NASHVILLE.

AND THE ESSENCE OF THEIR ALLEGATIONS IS THAT THE CITY IS IN VIOLATION ON MULTIPLE LOCATIONS AND MULTIPLICATIONS OF THE FEDERAL LAW CALLED THE CLEAN WATER ACT.

AND THE -- THE CITY HAS ALREADY BEEN IN NEGOTIATIONS IN THE PAST WITH THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENT CONSERVATION AND THEY ARE AWARE OF THIS SITUATION, AND WE PREVIOUSLY ENTERED INTO A SCENT ORDER, AND THIS TENNESSEE RIVER KEEPERS, THEY SIOUX CITYS AND TOWNS ALL ACROSS ALABAMA, TENNESSEE, NORTHERN MISSISSIPPI, BASICALLY THROUGHOUT THE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. AND THEY SUE BECAUSE THE FEDERAL LAW GIVES THEM THE RIGHT TO SUE, WHEN THERE ARE PROBLEMS WITH YOUR STORM WATER RUPP-OFF OR SEWER SYSTEMS, AND SO THIS IS A VERY COMMON THING TO HAPPEN. AND IT'S -- THE CITY HAS NEVER TRIED TO HIDE THIS.

YOU KNOW, WE'VE MADE ALL THE REPORTS WE'RE SUPPOSED TO MAKE TO THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENT CONSERVATION, AND SO SOME YEARS AGO, WE ENTERED INTO WHAT'S CALLED A SCENT ORDER WITH THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENT CONSERVATION AND IN THAT ORDER WE AGREED THAT -- AS THE CITY DID -- TO, OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS -- TO BUILD INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEMS THAT READ IT CLEAN WATER ACT PROBLEMS. AND SO WE ALREADY SIGNED THAT.

THAT WAS AN ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL ACTION. AND WE ALREADY SIGNED THAT ORDER. WE'RE ALREADY LEGALLY OBLIGED TO DO ALL THESE PRONGS, AND IT'S GONNA REQUIRE THE CITY TO SPEND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, SPECIFICALLY THE GAS WATER SEWER DEPARTMENT, SO IT'S GONNA BE PAID BIT RATEPAYERS, NOT TAXPAYERS.

ALONG COMES THE TENNESSEE RIVER KEEPERS AND THEY FILE THEIR LAWSUIT, AND BASICALLY THE ESSENCE IS THE SAME ALLEGATIONS THAT WERE INVOLVED IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAWSUIT THAT WAS

[02:55:06]

AND ALL OF THE SCENT DECREE REQUIRES IS THAT WE DO WHAT WE'RE ALREADY LEGALLY OBLIGED TO DO IN THE SCENT ORDER WITH T-DECK -- IN THE CONSENT ORDER WITH T-DECK.

THERE'S TWO ADDITIONAL THINGS THAT IT REQUIRES, THIS IS REALLY THE ONLY DIFFERENCE FROM THE CONSENT DECREE, THAT WOULD BE AN ACTUAL -- THE CONSENT DECREE WOULD ACTUALLY BE A FEDERAL COURT ORDER. THE ONLY TWO ADDITIONAL HAD THINGS THAT WE ARE AGREEING THAT WE WILL PROVIDE TENNESSEE RIVER KEEPERS WITH THESE REPORTS THAT WE ALREADY SEND AND ALREADY LEGALLY HE REQUIRED TO EXTEND TO T-DECK. AND THEY WOULD LIKE US TO SEND THE COPIES OF THE REPORTS TO THEM, AND THAT THE DECREE WOULD REQUIRE THAT, LEGALLY REQUIRE IT, AND THEY HAVE REQUESTED THAT WE MAKE A PAYMENT TO TENNESSEE RIVER KEEPERS FOR THEIR ATTORNEYS FEES AND AMOUNT OF $21,000 AND CHANGE. I WILL TELL YOU THAT IT'S STRONGLY RECOMMENDED BY ME AND BY OUR EXPERT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, MR. BILL PENNY AND GARY GROOMS WITH BAYER FORMAN LAW FIRM, WHO HAVE BEEN REPRESENTING NEWS THIS MATTER, AND MR. RIGGENS AND HIS ENGINEERS AT THE GAS AND WATER DEPARTMENT, WE ALL STRONGLY RECOMMEND THAT THIS IS A VERY FAIR AND ACTUALLY A VERY GOOD SETTLEMENT FOR THE CITY BECAUSE IFWELL GO FORWARD AND END UP GOING TO TRIAL, THERE IS THE POTENTIAL FOR THE COURT UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT TO ORDER THE CITY TO PAY A $50,000 CIVIL FINE PENALTY, IF YOU WILL, A CIVIL FINE FOR EACH VIOLATION, LOCATION FOR EACH DAY. NOW, IT'S HIGHLY UNLIKELY THAT THE COURT WOULD ACTUALLY ORDER, YOU KNOW, WHICH COULD BE MILLIONS AND MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS -- HIGHLY UNLIKELY THE COURT WOULD ACTUALLY ORDER THAT KIND OF A FINE.

IT'S LEGALLY POSSIBLE. BUT IT CERTAINLY IS WITHIN THE REALM OF POSSIBILITY THAT THE COURT COULD ORDER US TO PAY HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS.

IN ADDITION TO BEING ORDERED TO PAY FOR THE COST OF THE PROJECTS THAT WE'RE ALREADY LEGALLY

OBLIGED TO DO. >> COUNCIL PERSON SMITH. >> THANK YOU, SIR.

VERY WELL SAID. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU.

>> ANYONE ELSE HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING RESOLUTION 10? ARE YOU READY TO VOTE? ALL MEMBERS CAST YOUR VOTE. AND IT GETS ON THE BOARD. RESOLUTION 10 IS ADOPTED.

>> MAYOR, THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT. >> OKAY, WE ARE NOW READY FOR.

[9) GAS & WATER COMMITTEE]

[03:00:26]

WERE INSTALLED. >> MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND IN FAVOR MUCH THE AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION 63. ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION 63?

>> ARE YOU READY TO VOTE? ALL MEMBERS CAST YOUR VOTE FOR AMENDMENT TO 63.

>> THE DIRECTOR RIGGENS WOULD LIKE ME TO LET EVERYONE KNOW THAT YESTERDAY AND TODAY THE GAS AND WATER EXPERIENCED PHONE AND INTERNET CONNECTION ISSUES, THE ISSUES SHOULD BE RESOLVED BY TOMORROW MORNING, SERVICES THAT WERE SHUT OFF FOR NON-PAVEMENT YESTERDAY WERE TURNED BACK ON DUE TO THE INABILITY TO ACCESS CUSTOMERS' ACCOUNTS FOR PAYMENT AND A SUBSEQUENT RECONNECTION.

LATE PAYMENT PENALTIES YESTERDAY OR TODAY HAVE BEEN SUSPENDED. ALSO DUE TO THE INACCESSIBILITY.

NORMAL SERVICE ACCOUNT ACTIVITIES WILL RESUME MONDAY, ALL THE 9TH, THAT CONCLUDES MY

REPORT, MAYOR. THANK YOU. >> WE WILL TAKE THAT AS A MOTION FOR THE RESOLUTION 63 AS AMENDED. DO I HEAR A SECOND?

ALL RIGHT. >> WE GOT THE REPORT OUT LATE TOO.

ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE AMEND RESOLUTION? SEEING NONE, HEARING NONE.

ARE YOU READY TO VOTE? ALL MEMBERS CAST YOUR VOTE. ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE THEIR

VOTE? MADAM CLERK, TAKE THE VOTE. >> 11 YES, 0 NO, 0 ABSTAIN.

>> RESOLUTION 63 AS AMENDED. CHAIRPERSON... >> I WANT TO READ THE REPORT

AGAIN. >> YOU'RE OUT OF ORDER, SIR. OKAY.

>> THE REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS -- >> FROM THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.

>> OH, HOUSING AND COMMUNITY -- >> IT IS LIGHT. >> LET'S SEE.

I DON'T HAVE IT. I DON'T THINK THEY SENT ME A REPORT.

>> OKAY. >> SO WE CAN MOVE ON. >> NO REPORT.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> ANY QUESTION ABOUT THAT NO REPORT?

[11) PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE]

RICHMOND. YOU'RE RECOGNIZED. >> THANK YOU, PARKS AND REC HAD A GREAT JULY WITH OVER 10,000 FACILITY CHECK-INS AND OVER 3,000 ROUNDS OF GOLF AT SWAN LAKE. THE HARD-WORKING MAINTENANCE CREW THERE PLEATED 136 SERVICE REQUESTS WHILE THE DOWNTOWN MARKET HOSTED AN ON AVERAGE 70 VENDORS AND 1500 PATRONS EACH WEEK. COMING UP THIS WEEKEND IS THE BACK-TO-SCHOOL SPLASH ON FRIDAY, THE WONDER KIDS TRIATHLON AND MOVIES IN THE PARK ON SATURDAY, AND THE PHOTOGRAPHY DISPLAY ON SUNDAY, THAT'S IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE TENNESSEE AFRICAN-AMERICAN HISTORICAL GROUP. THE DEPARTMENT'S VERY BUSY PLANNING FOR RIVER FEST WHICH IS SEPTEMBER 9TH THROUGH THE 11TH. PLEASE VISIT OUR WEB SITE FOR MORE INFORMATION ON TURNING -- ENTERING YOUR CARDBOARD BOAT IN THE REGATTA OR IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN VOLUNTEERING, JUST WANT TO REPORT THAT THE LIGHT SERIES WAS A HUGE SUCCESS AND WE THANK YOU, MAYOR, FOR THAT AND PARTICULARLY THE PARKS AND REC STAFF.

AND THE NEXT MEETING FOR THE PARKS AND REC COMMITTEE WILL NOT MEET IN THE MONTH OF AUGUST AND WE WILL RECONVENE OUR NORMALLY SCHEDULED MEETINGS IN THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER.

>> AND THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT. >> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU FOR THAT REPORT.

WE ARE NOW READY FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON HOLMAN, YOU'RE RECOGNIZED.

[12) PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE]

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. ALL RIGHTY, JUST STARTING OFF WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.

TOTAL CALLS LAST MONTH THEY GOT 1,229 CALLS, 71.5% OF THEM WERE RESCUE AND MEDICAL CALLS.

THIS IS GONNA A SHORT ONE BECAUSE THIS IS MY FIRST TIME DOING THIS REPORT.

POLICE DEPARTMENT GOT 12,836 CAUSE. THEIR AVERAGE IS ABOUT 11,000 TO

[03:05:05]

>> OKAY, THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN. ANY QUESTIONS? SEEING NONE, WE'RE NOW READY FOR

[13) TRANSPORTATION-STREETS-GARAGE COMMITTEE]

RECOGNIZED. >> OKAY. THANK YOU.

THE TSG INFORMATION REPORTS FOL. WE WILL DO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT FIRST.

CTS TRANSPORTED THIN,44 -- 13,000 PASSENGERS AND TOTAL FOR THE MONTH OF JULY WAS OVER 7,000 AND DEMAND RESPONSE WAS 2,900. SO FAR THIS SUMMER CTS HAS PROVIDED 1,303 RIDES TO THE YOUTH OF GLOUCESTERVILLE. ALLOWING THEM TO ENJOY THE ENTERTAINMENT.

DON'T FORGET TO DOWNLOAD THE MOBILE APP ETA SPOT FOR UPDATED ROUTE INFORMATION, LOCATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. AND SO THE STREET DEPARTMENT REPORT IS AS FOLLOWS.

259 WORK ORDERS IN THE MONTH OF JULY. ALSO STREETS THAT HAVE BEEN PAVED ARE OLD TOWN VILLAGE SUBDIVISION, MARCUS NEIL ROAD AND TOWER DRIVE.

CAPITAL PROJECTS TRAFFIC 2020 UPDATES ARE AS FOLLOWS. STORM DRAINS AND ROAD INSTALLATION HAS BEGUN. CONCORD ROAD, SADWATTS, CONSTRUCTION IS UNDERWAY.

30% COMPLETED. CONTRACTORS ARE MOBILIZING AND UTILITY COORDINATORS ARE ON THE WAY. NOW, UTILITY COORDINATIONS ARE UNDER THE WAY.

OKAY. LEVELS OF INTEREST WERE RECEIVED FOR TRAFFIC 2020 FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING PROJECTS. HIGHWAY SR-4813 SIDEWALKS.

1 IMPROVEMENTS, MORE EXTINCTION IMPROVEMENTS, EXIT 1, LIGHTING AND SIGNALIZATION, SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, DESIGN PLANS ARE BEING DEVELOPED ON THE INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD EXTENSION. AND THAT'S AT THE SILICONE RANCH.

THE GARAGE REPORT IS AS FOLLOWS. >> THE FINAL WAS 228,138 DOLLARS, TOTAL WORK ORDERS WERE 407. TOTAL WORK ORDERS HOURS WERE 870.34.

THE COSTS FOR UNLEADED GAS WAS $2.38 PER GALLON, AND AN INCREASE BY -- LET'S SEE, IT WAS $2.59 -- NO. $2.25. INCREASED FROM $2.25.

IT WAS $2.38 PER GALLON. AND THEN WE HAVE THE DIESEL COSTS WAS $2.21 PER GALLON.

THE LAST DELIVERY ON JULY 28TH IT DECREASED TO $ $2.23. THIS CONCLUDES MY REPORT.

>> THANK YOU, CHAIRPERSON SMITH. WE ARE NOW READY FOR NEW BUSINESS.

[14) NEW BUSINESS]

>> MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND PROPERLY SECONDED IN FAVOR OF ORDNANCE 13 THAT WAS EXPLAINED EARLIER ABOUT CEMC, EXPANDING OR UPFITTING THEIR SUBSTATION AND MEETING IN EASEMENT VIA TBA TO GO ACROSS OUR PROPERTY. ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ARE WE READY TO VOTE ON ORDNANCE 13?

ALL MEMBERS CAST YOUR VOTE. >> ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE YOUR VOTE?

[03:10:04]

MADAM CLERK. >> 11 YES, 0 NO, 0 ABSTAIN. >> ORDNANCE 13 IS ADOPTED, FIRST READING. THANK YOU, WE ARE NOW READY FOR ITEM 2 UNDER NEW BUSINESS, RESOLUTION 59, 20-21, REQUESTING THE FENS GENERAL ASSEMBLY ACCORDING EXHIBIT A.

COUNCILPERSON BUTLER YOU ARE RECOGNIZED AS A SPONSOR. >> THANK YOU, MAYOR.

FIRST OF ALL, THE REASON MY NAME'S ON THIS IS BECAUSE I ADOPTED A COUPLE OF RICHARD GARRETT'S ANTICIPATES. I AM GOING TO MOTION FOR IT, AND THEN POSTPONE IT.

RESOLUTION MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 59-20-21. >> MOTION HAS BEEN MADE, IMPROPERLY SECONDED. WE'VE BEEN POSTPONING IT AND POSTPONING IT.

WE KNOW TO POSTPONE IT AGAIN BECAUSE WE ARE A SIXTH OF THIS COUNCIL DOWN.

THAT'S A SIXTH OF CLARKSVILLE, THAT'S BETWEEN 30 AND 40,000. CONSTITUENTS AND CITIZENS ARE NOT REPRESENTED UP HERE. SO A MOTION TO POSTPONE THIS UNTIL -- WHAT DO WE SAY --

OCTOBER, WE'LL HAVE -- >> SEPTEMBER WE WILL APPOINT, WE HOPE, THE REPLACEMENTS FOR THE TWO COUNCIL SEATS. DO WE WANT TO POSTPONE IT TO -- POST IT TO THE SPECIAL OR THE

NEXT REGULAR? >> WELL, IF YOU POST IT TO THE NEXT REGULAR SESSION, WE WON'T

HAVE IT. >> OKAY, OCTOBER REGULAR SESSION.

>> OKAY, YOU HEARD THE POSTPONEMENT TO THE OCTOBER POSTPONEMENT.

HEARING NONE, SEEING NONE. ARE YOU READY TO VOTE? WE'RE VOTING ON THE POSTPONEMENT. ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE THEIR VOTE?

TAKE THE VOTE. >> THANK YOU. WE'RE NOW READY FOR ITEM NUMBER 3, RESOLUTION 65, 2020-21. THE COMMITTEE AS A WHOLE TO STEADY MAKE RELATIONS PERTAINING TO THE SIT CODE OF ETHICS. COUNCILPERSON ALAN, YOU'RE RECOGNIZED.

>> A MOTION TO APPROVE. >> MOTION BEEN MADE FOR RESOLUTION 65.

>> DO I HEAR A SECOND? PROPERLY SECONDED, YOU'RE RECOGNIZED.

>> JUST LIKE THE PREVIOUS SPEAKER, WE ARE DOWN TO COUNCIL -- TWO COUNCIL PEOPLE SO I WOULD LIKE TO WAIT SO WE CAN ALL MEET AT TABLE WHEN IT COMES TO ETHICS EVEN THOUGH WE'VE BEEN PUSHING IT DOWN THE ROAD FOR A WHILE, I HOPE THAT WHEN THEY GET HERE, WE CAN START WORKING ON IT.

SO I MOTION TO POSTPONE. >> MOTION TO POSTPONE TILL WHEN? >> TILL OCTOBER.

THE OCTOBER REGULAR SESSION? >> YES, SIR. >> OKAY.

YOU'VE HEARD THE MOTION TO POSTPONE RESOLUTION 65 TO THE OCTOBER SESSION.

HEARING NONE, SEEING NONE, ARE YOU READY TO VOTE? ED ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE

THEIR VOTE? >> 11 YES, ZERO NO, ZERO ABSTAIN.

>> MOTION TO POSTPONE IS NOW ADOPTED AND WE ARE READY FOR RESOLUTION ITEM 4, RESOLUTION 420-21-22. PERFORM AN AREA WIDE STUDY IN THE RED RIVER DISTRICT.

COUNCILPERSON SMITH YOU ARE THE SPONSOR AND YOU ARE RECOGNIZED. >> I WANT TO MAKE A MOTION TO

POSTPONE RESOLUTION 421.22. >> LET'S MAKE A MOTION IN FAVOR FIRST.

>> WE'LL CONSIDER THAT A MOTION IN FAVOR OF RESOLUTION 4. NOW YOU ARE RECOGNIZED

COUNCILPERSON SMITH. >> I WANT TO POSTPONE THIS RESOLUTION BECAUSE WE'RE GOING TO GET THE COMMUNITY TOGETHER TO MEET AND DISCUSS HIS FATHER AND -- DISCUSS THIS FURTHER AND ALSO I WANTED TO TALK TO SOMEONE I HAVE HIRED TO INVESTIGATE TO TRY TO SEE HOW WE CAN GO ABOUT THIS TO MAIC IT BETTER IN OUR COMMUNITY. I'M MAKING A MOTION TO POSTPONE.

[03:15:02]

>> UNTIL WHEN? >> UNTIL OCTOBER, THE REGULAR SESSION.

>> OKAY. THE GONNA BE A BUSY FALL WE HAVE A MOTION TO POSTPONE RESOLUTION 4 UNTIL THE OCTOBER REGULAR SESSION. COUNCILPERSON REYNOLDS, DID YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE MOTION TO POSTPONE OR THE ORIGINAL MOTION?

>> IT'S A BASIC QUESTION, AND I THINK I KNOW THE ANSWER. RED RIVER DISTRICT IS NOT IN THE HISTORICAL DISTRICT IS THAT CORRECT? NO, IT IS NOT.

>> THE MOTION IS TO POSTPONE. RESOLUTION 4 FOR -- RESOLUTION FOR THE OCTOBER REGULAR SESSION.

ALL MEMBERS CAST YOUR VOTE LIKE YOU'RE ALREADY DOING. OKAY.

>> ANY MEMBER WISH TO CHANGE YOUR VOTE? >> 11 YES, 0 NO, 0 ABSTAIN.

MOTION TO POSTPONE IS ADOPTED. THANK YOU. WE ARE READY FOR MAYOR AND

[15) MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS]

OUR GAS, WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT REFUNDED REVENUE BONDS TOTALING NEARLY SCHOOL.3 MILLION DOLLARS 2121-B ON AUGUST 4TH WITH PAYMENTS FROM 2021 TO 20 DISPRUN THAT PRESENT VALUE SAVINGS IMPORTANT OF OVER $7 METAL. ADDITIONALLY THEY ISSUED REVENUE BONDS IN EXCESS OF $187.7 MILLION AS SERIES 2021-A/TIC OF 2.36% WITH MOODY'S RATING AND STANDARD OF POORS RATING FROM 2026 TO 2021. BOTH OF THE DEAD ISSUANCE ARE GUARANTEED BY THE GAS AND WATER DEPARTMENT OF CLARKSVILLE. ANY OTHER COUNCILMEMBER HAVE A

COMMENT? COUNCILPERSON SMITH. >> I WANT TO REMIND WHOARCH IS PRESENT TODAY THAT THE AUGUST THE 8TH CELEBRATION STARTS ON TOMORROW.

THE PARADE WILL BEGIN AT 5:30 P.M. ON EIGHTH AND COTTAGE STREETED.

>> LO UP THE ROUTE, WE PRAY YOU COME OUT AND CELEBRATE BECAUSE WE WANT THIS TO BE A MULTIETHNIC EVENT, SO COLORFUL THAT WE DO NOT SEE RATES BUT THE FRUITS OF OUR LABOR.

THANK YOU. M COUNCILPERSON ALAN, YOU'RE RECOGNIZED.

>> SCHOOL STARTS MONDAY AND WITH SCHOOL STARTING MONDAY, WE KNOW TO SLOW DOWN.

OUR KIDS ARE WALKING TO SCHOOL, BUSES ARE STOPPING. >> I HOPE THAT THE POLICE PULL YOU OVER AND YOU GET A TICKET IF YOU ARE SPEEDING PAST THESE BUSES.

I'M GOING TO CALL THEM MYSELF. I'M TELLING YOU GUYS, SLOW DOWN. WE HAVE KIDS WALKING AND EVERYTHING LIKE THAT, AND THAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING THAT OUR KIDS ARE GOING TO SCHOOL AND GETTING THERE SAFE AND COMING HOME SAFE. THANK YOU.

>> ANYBODY ELSE? MOTION TO

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.